Karl Marx famously stated that religion was the “opiate of the masses”. But Marx (unsurprisingly) had it wrong: the government nanny state is the real opiate of the masses. It is injected into our lives by the Leftist drug pushers who wish to control us, hook us on their DC-manufactured “progressivism”, and depend upon them for all of our needs. They know that once we’re hooked, we like it. We may not want to like it, because we know it’s really wrong to have such a dependency upon government. But we can’t help ourselves. There’s all that free stuff, just waiting for us to swallow it and make us feel good.
Today, many are rightfully up in arms about the looming disaster that is health care socialization. During the run-up to this catastrophe, many focused on the so-called “public option” and how evil it would be to have a single-payer or government health care provider (a’la the British NHS) system. But the “public option” was not the real problem – it is a government takeover of a vast swath of the American economy and the theft of freedom to choose whether we wish to be under the thumb of Big Brother. The Democrat drug lords are trying to get us to sample yet a stronger dope. What happens if this legislation passes? Will we have the will-power to resist? Or will we take a hit and find that we like it…and beg for more and more?
This past week, Mark Steyn made a critical point about the motivation of the Democrats in passing this healthcare bill. It has little to do with healthcare and much to do with government intrusion in our lives. As Steyn states, the Democrats are out to establish a “permanent left-of-center political culture.” Since 2008, we have made much of how the USA is still a “center-right” nation. The Left knows that. They don’t like it. They know that we are not hooked enough on their political philosophy. While entitlements drive over half of the United States budget, those entitlements are largely focused on senior citizens, with Social Security and Medicare. That population, while hugely influential in elections, is not the majority. Once health care is socialized, the rest of us very well could fall under the drug-induced intoxication of entitlement.
Steyn cites the example of Canada:
A year or two back, when the Canadian Islamic Congress attempted to criminalize my writing north of the border by taking me to the Canadian “human rights” commission, a number of outraged American readers wrote to me saying, “You need to start kicking up a fuss about this, Steyn, and then maybe Canadians will get mad and elect a conservative government that will end this nonsense.”
Makes perfect sense. Except that Canada already has a Conservative government under a Conservative prime minister, and the very head of the “human rights” commission investigating me was herself the Conservative appointee of a Conservative minister of justice. Makes no difference. Once the state swells to a certain size, the people available to fill the ever expanding number of government jobs will be statists — sometimes hard-core Marxist statists, sometimes social-engineering multiculti statists, sometimes fluffily “compassionate” statists, but always statists. …
But you say “Bill, we’re going to have this thing repealed if they pass it!!” Really? When has the GOP ever repealed a single government program…especially with a Democrat POTUS? If you think the “Health Care Summit” was a Democrat sob-story-fest, just wait until the Democrats start accusing the GOP of trying to remove life support from defenseless children. Repeal will not be easy. It will require the Republicans to a) get the majority, and b) have the guts to pass legislation that forces Obama to accept elimination of funding for the ReidPeloBamaCare package.
On the repeal topic, Steyn says:
Republicans are good at keeping the seat warm. A bigtime GOP consultant was on TV crowing that Republicans wanted the Dems to pass Obamacare because it’s so unpopular it will guarantee a GOP sweep in November. Okay, then what? You’ll roll it back — like you’ve rolled back all those other unsustainable entitlements premised on cobwebbed actuarial tables from 80 years ago? Like you’ve undone the federal Department of Education and of Energy and all the other nickel ’n’ dime novelties of even a universally reviled one-term loser like Jimmy Carter? Andrew McCarthy concluded a shrewd analysis of the political realities thus: “Health care is a loser for the Left only if the Right has the steel to undo it. The Left is banking on an absence of steel. Why is that a bad bet?”
It’s not a bad bet, especially given the utterly spineless GOP leadership that is in place today. This is why numerous diaries on Redstate have excoriated GOP leaders such as Sen. Mitch McConnell for their lack of testicular fortitude.
And it is not just the GOP leadership at fault. It is also the American people themselves. We have allowed ourselves to become addicted to governmental freebies. We suck down rebates on home loans and “cash for clunkers.” We send our kids to government schools. And there is nary a single politician in the post-GWB GOP who appears willing to put their neck on the chopping block to try to remedy the real problem – the out-of-control spending on Medicare and Social Security. Why? Because the aforementioned senior citizens – the most faithful voting bloc, and who are highly dependent on the entitlement crack – would crucify them. But who can blame them? They are in a tight spot – the nanny state promised to take care of them, give them a nice monthly check and cheap/free health care in return for their dependency. It would be tough to pull the rug out now. But we must explore ways to fix this, or the economy will implode beneath the weight of this entitlement drug.
The Dems are apparently willing to take huge losses in order to promote their ideology. They are simply expanding the scope of this self-interest, nanny-state-hooked attitude. It’s quite possible that once healthcare socialization passes, the remainder of the nation may be well on the way to addiction.
Several Redstate diarists and commenters have riffed on Steyn’s main point:
…government health care is not about health care, it’s about government. Once you look at it that way, what the Dems are doing makes perfect sense. For them.
This is about Democrat ideology. It’s about gaining permanent control over the thinking and attitudes of Americans. It’s about pushing an addiction to the crack cocaine of government handouts and a government nanny state. They want Americans to want to be coddled and babied and taken care of.
We see a similar scenario in the Bible. In 1 Samuel 8, Israel approaches Samuel and tells him that they want a king.
19 But the people refused to listen to Samuel. “No!” they said. “We want a king over us. 20 Then we will be like all the other nations, with a king to lead us and to go out before us and fight our battles.“
God was not fond of that idea, but like when the Israelites demanded meat, he decided to give them what they asked, so they would learn their lesson.
Many of us have already learned our lessons. Conservatives know that the drug that the Democrats are peddling is dangerous. This likely explains the significant opposition to ReidPeloBamaCare – there are more Americans who are conservatives than liberals or moderates, and those Conservatives oppose this further shift towards turning the United States into an oversized crack house. Yet the Democrats carry on, because they are convinced that their way is the right way.
It is incumbent upon us to fight. It is not inevitable that the Democrats will win this. It is apparent from the polls that Americans have not yet succumbed to their addiction – a clear majority opposes the nanny-state-takeover of health care. Conservatives know what is good for them and what will be beneficial for them and for the nation in the long run. We must continue to battle the Democrat drug lords in Congress and in the Oval Office.
So: take action! READ THIS, find your Congressperson’s phone number, pick up the phone and call their office to voice your opposition to this abomination.
Just say “no” to Barack Obama’s nanny-state healthcare crack.
Aaron Gardner
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
There's always a first time.
writeblock Saturday, March 13th at 6:14PM EST (link)Look at NJ. It’s doing the unthinkable. The people are taking their state back. It’s not impossible. It takes a true leader, a Reagan, someone who understands how to use the levers of power to reverse established patterns. One of the reasons for previous failure has been the weakness of the GOP establishment and its business-as-usual attitude toward governance. We need to take over the party and then make the tough calls no matter how much the left starts squealing. We need to sweep it all away, political correctness, evironmental aggression, academic indoctrination, public school subversion–and stop worrying about how we’ll be portrayed in the media as we pursue our revolutionary agenda. The backlash will only be beginning in November.
I agree with your comments
Jonas Parker Saturday, March 13th at 6:21PM EST (link)Except for the remark about needing a Reagan. Unlikely there is a Reagan around. What we need is for millions of people to be so motivated that they do whatever it takes to stop this. With that level of motivation, a Reagan is not needed. Without it, even Reagan couldn’t roll this back (and, substantially, he in fact did NOT)
This Diary Is Far Too Negative
IJB Saturday, March 13th at 7:11PM EST (link)I don’t have the time to go through line-by-line why it’s too negative, but it definitely is.
Suffice it to say, America isn’t Canada, and Americans aren’t Canadians. And I doubt that’s ever going to change.
And you're wrong
Bill S (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 7:17PM EST (link)But I don’t have time to tell you why.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - We're All Going To DDIIIEEEEE!!!
IJB Saturday, March 13th at 7:25PM EST (link)I get it. There’s no winning in being a conservative. We can never win. Yada yada yada.
I sometimes wonder why some people on our side even bother with this defeatist bull…
Because we're conservatives
aesthete (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 2:45AM EST (link)and we’re too busy defending, expanding, and “reforming” current entitlements to bother looking at realistic ways to repeal them, no matter how unpopular they are. Hell, I guess it is the height of true conservatism to want to preserve a dysfunctional system simply because it exists and has existed in the past, but I have no idea why American conservatives would want any part in true conservatism, to begin with.
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
It has always been about power and control.
penguin2 (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 7:15PM EST (link)Maybe there are a few genuine ideologues who really believe that government knows best, but for the majority of the Leftists, it is about power. They do not care a hoot for the people; we are just common folk to them, like ants in an anthill to be squashed. Concentrating power and money in the hands of a few, some percentage of the population, takes away the middle class – which has economic and political power – and creates an even bigger group on the lower end of the socio-economic scale, from which they cannot rise up.
IMO, the real tragedy has been the incremental Socialism that has been foisted upon us for several decades. Look around, we already have the Nanny state everywhere, our schools, our neighborhoods, and even our churches. Infringement on freedom for the individual to make their own choices based on their own efforts and consequences of what they do or fail to do. The Founding Fathers tried to set it up for us and get us started.
I don’t know if there will be enough people to hold this administration accountable for the destruction.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills
Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List
Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots
I disagree with the analogy
DerKrieger (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 7:53PM EST (link)Senior citizens aren’t “addicted” to government. They’re simply trying to recoup their forced contributions. They rightly claim that since they were taxed for these programs they have every expectation to get their money back. When you ask workers not yet on SS or Medicare and who are 45 or younger many, and the number increases as age decreases, will say that they would willingly forsake all previous contributions if they could opt out going forward. When I mention to my retired father the unfairness of Social Security and that I think it should be abolished he gets angry and says that he was forced to pay for it and there was no way he would give it up. That’s why Social Security reform has to be a decades long process aimed primarily at the young.
The health care isn’t Social Security. The middle class won’t be happy about paying more to get the same or less in “benefits”. The addicts are those that don’t contribute, the parasites, the Democrat voter.
“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison
Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690
And you'll be forced to "contribute" to get healthcare as well
Bill S (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 12:15AM EST (link)by way of increased taxes, forced participation in insurance plans. Is that going to be sufficient excuse to go along with that as well. Why, then, do anything with private insurance if the gubmint is going to provide you a nice, inexpensive alternative?
The problem is that we all use the excuse that “we pay into it, therefore we ought to get something back” – this is true of SSI, Medicare, schools, rebates, and any other gov’t giveaway.
The point is that we a) we ought to be combatting the participation in the first place, and b) the entitlement system is so damned expensive that the federal budget will be overwhelmingly paying for interest payments over/above any other item in the budget within 20 years. Read the budget documents.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
As the number of active workers supporting each retiree falls
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 12:38AM EST (link)from three to two, there will be some hard choices to make. You either cut benefits by 33% or raise the taxes that fund those benefits by 50%. Yikes.
Open buffets result in more consumption than a-la-carte purchases and are the most expensive when everything on the menu is included in the buffet. And that’s exactly what we have in America, an open buffet of health-care. Is it any surprise at all that medical costs are skyrocketing when the individual is incentivized to consume as much as he/she pleases? Another RedState poster quoted a figure of 13% borne by the consumer, 87% borne by the insurance companies. So of course insurance is expensive to pay for that 87%. And since the individual is just a drop in the bucket of that 87%, restraint in consumption will do the individual no good as others consume away.
So when the demographics-based rationing comes, as it must, what will produce better utility for American consumers? Government bureaucrats deciding what is important, with individuals still incentivized to grab as much as they can get, or individuals deciding what is important, because they have to pay a substantial portion of the bill to get that runny nose examined?
It’s time that we returned health “insurance” back to genuine insurance, and stop the madness of the all-you-can-eat service plan.
Great post, 5
aesthete (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 2:58AM EST (link)You should put it up as its own diary: it does a good job of explaining why government-run healthcare doesn’t work, and why we’re in the mess we’re in right now.
Plus, it uses the word “utility” in an economic context, and you don’t see that nearly as often as you should
The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton
Thanks for the suggestion :)
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 4:19PM EST (link)done
SSI as entitlement?
cliffieb Monday, March 15th at 6:17AM EST (link)Could someone please explain how this can be? SSI as an entitlement. I’d like to know how from the moment SSI was enacted into law to the present. After over 50 years of paying in I now am told that I am dependent on the young working class to support me. It seems to me that there is an important piece missing from this explanation. Can anyone help me understand?
The government has spent your SS taxes
6eorge Jetson (Diary) Monday, March 15th at 6:36AM EST (link)And on the horizon, there will be a time when there will be too few workers to pay you back in accordance with the present terms.
And as far as legal rights, you don’t own jack. It’s not your money until it gets paid to you.
Is this how you would have managed your own retirement account if all those SS taxes you paid over the years had gone into an account legally owned by you?
Dependency is dependency regardless of the rationale
engineerjohn Sunday, March 14th at 9:24AM EST (link)DerKrieger, rather than refuting Bill’s argument, you are bolstering it. The government has successfully created an expectation that they will provide for your father’s care rather than him doing so indepentently. I do not argue that his reasoning is flawed or unjustified, but it creates a dependency nonetheless.
Such a dependency, no matter how we get there or how it is rationalized, is addiction.
So we keep the Ponzi scheme going?
Next93 (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 11:03AM EST (link)Senior citizens who complain that they’ve paid into Social Security and should therefore get full benefits are like victims of a ponzi scheme calling for the scheme to keep going until they’re made whole. Except most victims of Ponzi schemes don’t know that the money’s being siphoned off, let alone get a voice in how the funds money will be missaproriated.
Yes, seniors paid into the system, and then the government that *they* legally elected, chose to misappropriate those funds in broad daylight and with thier collective endorsement.
At the end of the day, someone’s going to get screwed by this situation, and I think it should be the same generation that elected the people who stole that money in the first place. And, yeah, that includes people who voted Republican all those years. We’ve had a generation of the “benefits” that flow from a government “solving problems” and “taking care of our most vulnerable members” with other people’s money, and it’s now time to pay the piper. It’s not like anyone my age didn’t know that the trust fund was being systematically looted. We didn’t demand that the situation be stopped, we kept electing politicians who simply couldn’t find the courage to address the problem, and this is what we get.
Look at the bright side: if our generation ends up getting screwed over, maybe it will serve as a cautionary tale to our children and thier children that the purpose of government is NOT to “take care of people”.
Obama was The One in 2008.
He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.
Ponzi scheme. Its that simple
robobbob Monday, March 15th at 9:11AM EST (link)Just take one moment to think about it. How is it possible to pay money into a system, then collect a multiple of that out of the system? The system doesn’t create anything. It doesn’t build anything. All of its cash flow comes from constantly bringing in fresh investors. If anyone tried to peddle SSI as a private investment, they would go to jail.
The money you paid in did not go into a magic algore lock box for your safe keeping, waiting for you to collect. It went to pay off current investors. It went into bridges to nowhere and other such nonesense. It’s gone. And now that our wonderful health system is keeping people alive longer to collect more out of the system, the gov’s lies are all about to come crashing in. Just like what happened to Madoff when the market downturn exposed all of his lies. Is it any surprise the Dems want to have the power to manage healthcare, as that gives them the ability to manage the long term SSI requirements?
An addict is someone who can’t stop a behavior even if they want to. Countless millions have lived their lives believing the gov. lies. They have arranged their finances and made their plans based on the lies. How many people are willing and prepared to just walk away voluntarily from SSI? You are an addict and don’t even know it. Hooked on a drug the government pusher forced you to take.
Now, is it possible to cut the masses off cold turkey like a heroin addict? No, the best that could be hoped for is a slow withdraw.
Bill S hits some great points. It is all about eventual complete control.
archer52 Saturday, March 13th at 7:55PM EST (link)The Dems are willing to take a step back to gain ten steps forward. They assume some day they’ll be running the Britain like administrative government which will guarantee their total dominance. The Republican establishment is willing to trade seats back and forth because neither will lose much power and all will have a chance to make millions and ensure their families get picked for that elite upper crust.
The rest of us? Drones and indentured servants.
Who’s for digging up Jefferson, Washington and Adams and seeing if we can’t get some DNA for cloning?
Read where O'care will result in
louisiana (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 8:32PM EST (link)150,000 new jobs. That’s the other hook. Who’s going to vote for a Congressman that will legislate to end their job, or that of their family or friends.
Would you?
Well folks in
avgjo (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 8:34PM EST (link)NEW JERSEY of all places voted in a governor who is doing basically that.
Hey, we put a man on the moon. The Saints won the Super Bowl.
Anything’s possible.
Ceterum autem censeo, Obamaecuram esse delendam.
british NHS is a prime example
Next93 (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 1:52AM EST (link)The conservatives in Britain don’t dare speak out against the NHS (the one who did this past winter was disowned so fast you would have thought he was caught tap-dancing in a bathroom stall). As I understand it, the NHS is one of the biggest employers in Europe, so speaking against the NHS is like speaking against the teacher’s union.
Obama was The One in 2008.
He’ll be a BIGGER one in 2012.
British NHS
mschuh Sunday, March 14th at 6:42AM EST (link)The British NHS is the third largest employer in the WORLD. It only trails the Chinese army and the Indian rail system.
The British
avgjo (Diary) Monday, March 15th at 8:37PM EST (link)are wired to be ruled. They have always been subjects. I love ‘em, but that’s the truth.
Everyone talks about the socialism ‘genie’ that’s ‘being let out the bottle’. I’m pretty sure the founders let a genie of ‘freedom’ out.
We’re hard wired against this nonsense.
Let it exist 20 years, and yeah, we’ll be in the same boat.
Whether that happens depends on whether America has more hand-wringers or or more men/women of action.
From what I’ve seen, in the physical world, there are far more people of action than hand wringers.
We’re gonna fight this stuff til it’s defeated.
No. matter. what.
Ceterum autem censeo, Obamaecuram esse delendam.
Great diary Bill S- You hit just the right notes
Scope (Diary) Saturday, March 13th at 9:39PM EST (link)not promoting or calling for a bloody revolution, but, rather a stern warning of just what we are looking at with Obama and the Progressives in control.
You are so correct that the people must be weaned off the cocaine or opium of entitlements. This massive expense for the federal government has been spiraling out of control for years. The can keeps getting kicked down the road by both parties. Because most politicians are more concerned with their re-elections, they refuse to even breathe entitlement reform. Sure, it has to be done incrementally, to not just pull the rug out from those who have lost chunks of their earnings for many years.
I read an article recently that made the point that SS and Medicare are fairly new entitlements, in the history of our country. How many older posters here remember their grandparents depending on SS or Medicare for their old age? My grandparents never collected any of those government handouts.
What a BRILLIANT correlation between the....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, March 14th at 8:30AM EST (link)dependence of drugs and the dependence of government because both are made of a LAZY heart
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Here's some hard truth
teridavisnewman (Diary) Monday, March 15th at 8:32PM EST (link)Here’s some hard truth. The reason we are in the mess we are in can be boiled down to one word: Apathy. For so many years we ignored the government while they did exactly as they pleased–and they go used to it. Sure, some people would bitch but they’d be ignored because life was good in America and no one ever believed that we’d elect a communist or that the media would stop being our watchdog. All of this shit happened when we weren’t paying attention–we had a nice standard of living, the wolf wasn’t at the door for most of us and we were secure in our jobs. Then the lawyers started advertising and all of a sudden we started suing everyone because everyone wants to get rich by winning a big lawsuit for millions instead of working for it and political correctness made us afraid to speak up and our kids got dumbed down and taught not to question that the government is all knowing and benevolent.. While this was happening, America got more and more involved in our lives and we have taken a big turn towards Socialism in the last two decades–and everyone ignored it because life was still good and anytime they wanted something, they borrowed money against the big charge card they lived in. Then the housing bubble exploded and suddenly America realized that not only are we broke, we are severely in debt with a government that seems to know no restraint on borrowing more money from the most evil regime the world has seen since the fall of the USSR (by the way who now have a viable economy and the same political dogma) who have been stealing our jobs because we priced ourselves out of the market. The unions want $30 an hour and benefits for a factory job that pays $120 A MONTH in China–what are the odds that with free trade in place we will ever be able to compete with them–but I digress. The government of China has a wonderful work incentive–work or die. If you are able-bodied and don’t work, they will put you in a forced labor camp and MAKE you work until you are released which is usually about until the day you keel over and then they send you to your family to take care of or if you have no family to take care of you; you get to live in the street until you starve to death or die some other way. We are trillions of dollars in debt to these people. Now the government has decided that in addition to GM (a payoff to the union for putting Obama in office) and the banks and the student loans, they want to run health care because of the profit potential in siphoning off money for their corrupt pals. Since they are used to getting away with doing anything they want to do, they are sure that America will just forget about it come election time–or they’ll lose a few seats and they’ll get them back because historically we don’t care what they do because life is good in America. Now the TEA parties and 9-12 groups are stirring up America and the average American is at lease AWARE of what’s going on if not actively fighting it. If they pass this health care, there needs to be a blood bath in Congress and it needs to be repealed–a bill I will have in my hand when they swear me in January 3, 2011. I pray to the God that America has forgotten that it’s not too late to turn our country around and there are going to be very tough times ahead for the “me” generation.
The one tiny shining light is that the apathy that has gripped America for so long is fast becoming a thing of the past and we are uniting in a 2nd American Revolution and if we can elect some honest people who want to do what’s right for AMERICA and not each other, we may be able to turn it around and bring it back. I hope so–otherwise we will spend our golden years either far from our beloved America or in fear of our government. Neither option is appealing to me, so I’m trying to get rid of the corrupt Costello and try to do what’s right for America before it’s too late–if it isn’t already.
Teri Davis Newman
2010 Republican Nominee for Congress
2012 Candidate for Congress
12th Congressional District of Illinois
www.terinewman.com