Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan is allegedly running for Senate in 2010 against Republican Rep. Roy Blunt. But you wouldn’t know it from listening to her. In fact, she’s pretty much been MIA since announcing her intent to run. We’ve beat on her here on RS, the Missouri GOP has mocked her, and there’s even a “Where’s Robin?” Twitter presence. She’s a pretty easy target, as she – at least up ’til last week – has steadfastly refused to tell anyone what she thinks about pretty much anything.
Those of us on the Right have noted for a while now that Carnahan has been ducking from any examination of her positions on key national issues… and now even the left is starting to mock her for it. This week, the (at least borderline) liberal blog “St. Louis Oracle” poked Robin about her near-silence. The Oracle seems to have been awakened not as much by Carnahan’s emergence from her political hibernation as by the fact that she (unsurprisingly) kissed up to Barack Obama by supporting his newfound hawkish position on a troop surge in Afghanistan. To those of us on the Right, this is unsurprising – we fully expect Carnahan would be an Obama/Reid lapdog. But to the Left, this troop surge is akin to Obama donning a GWB mask, and Carnahan’s support does not play well with the anti-war pacifists on their side.
Aside from his opposition to Carnahan’s troop surge support, the Oracle makes a very interesting point about her behavior – he notes that Carnahan is employing a strategy referred to as the “Rose Garden” strategy:
Actually, it’s an embodiment of an old political ploy called the “rose garden” strategy. It evolved from the conduct of incumbent presidents seeking to look presidential by busying themselves with the duties of the office while publicly ignoring the campaign. Ms. Carnahan seems to be trying to look busy as secretary of state and ride into office on her reputation from that office and her unmistakable family name.
Wait… what? This is from a “progressive”? Progressive or not, his observation is dead on target. This is exactly what Robin is doing.
But there’s more…
My early inclination was to support Ms. Carnahan’s candidacy. She had won two statewide races with progressive support, and we have assumed she was progressive. Conventional wisdom is that she is smarter than her disappointing brother, Rep. Russ Carnahan, but at least Russ takes stands (even if they’re just whatever the Speaker’s aides tell him to say). Robin’s indecision makes her look even less attuned to issues than Russ! Both announced Republican contenders, Rep. Roy Blunt and state Sen. Chuck Purgason, have taken decidedly unprogressive stands on the issues, but at least they too have taken stands. Leadership requires taking stands that influences others to do the same. Merely not being Blunt or Purgason doesn’t cut it.
Nice! A pot-shot at Russ Carnahan AND he hits Robin for not taking stances. I couldn’t have said it better myself.
I had to chuckle at his final point:
A progressive long shot, Code Pink activist Midge Potts of Springfield, is circulating petitions to get the Progressive Party back on the ballot, enabling her to seek this senate seat under that party’s banner.
Yes, that’s exactly what we need – a Code Pinko candidate running against Robin. Heh. Pass the popcorn on that one. I can see it now – Robin and Midge, battling it out to see who can be the leftest of the left.
Now this is all pretty amusing, but back to the main point – Robin Carnahan is trying to avoid stating her positions on the issues because she knows that once she does this, the citizens of Missouri will be able to see what an utterly hopeless leftist Obama lackey she will be. And in a state that is firmly opposed to Obama policies, that is not a good position to be in. So she will continue to try to lounge in the quiet privacy of her Rose Garden, hoping that no one will catch onto her real ideology. Good luck with that, Robin. It ain’t working out too well so far.
KnightsofMalta
Steve Maley
Caleb Howe
How sad is it, that a "Progressive" has to point out the obvious,
USNJIMRET (Diary) Saturday, December 5th at 8:38AM EST (link)“Leadership requires taking stands that influences others to do the same. Merely not being Blunt or Purgason doesn’t cut it.”
Perhaps our Congressional Republican “leadership” should pay attention?
Well it has to be them to point it out
Leopard1996 (Diary) Saturday, December 5th at 9:12AM EST (link)If this had come from anybody conservative, it would be a lie in their eyes. The fact that a MSM/Progressive/Libtard paper pointed it out makes gives it credibility.
“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen
FWIW...
Bill S (Diary) Saturday, December 5th at 9:18AM EST (link)If you read The Oracle’s blog, he’s not your typical far-left whacko. The blog is very thoughtful and even-handed. He does not appear to be a star-struck, devoid-of-intelligence Kos Kid like we’re used to seeing. I am going to add his blog to my regular reading list. He looks to be a pretty sharp guy that the term “libtard” does not apply to.
“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins
My point
Leopard1996 (Diary) Saturday, December 5th at 9:25AM EST (link)Was more to say that if this came from Erick Erickson, or even a evenhanded writer from something like the national review, it would be deemed as a lie or political, the fact that the medium exposing this is a MSM/liberal bent paper lends credibility to showing how much of a unrepentant idiot Carnahan may be.
“The accumluated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, “Save Us!”….and I’ll look down and whisper, “No”…The Watchmen
Of course she's hiding
RedBeard Saturday, December 5th at 9:35AM EST (link)Libs have to hide, dissemble, distract. You know, LIE. If they revealed themselves fully, there would be only about 6 lib senators and 50 lib congressmen in Washington.
Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.
"Progressivism" is unconstitutional
DerKrieger (Diary) Saturday, December 5th at 10:55AM EST (link)Or rather many of the goals of so-called Progressives are unconstitutional. If we had a government that had any reverence for our founding document then progressivism would never even be able to gain any traction. Most of Obama’s progressive agenda could be defeated on Constitutional grounds if we hadn’t abandoned it.
“In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson
“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.” – James Madison
Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.” — John Locke, 1690
This is one thing that is truly bipartisan
RedBeard Saturday, December 5th at 12:22PM EST (link)The single most disturbing thing about the DC Republicans is their willingness to dismiss the Supreme Law of the Land. Admittedly, this is done deliberately and aggressively by the Dems and done tacitly/de facto by the Republicans, but the end result is the same, a government rub amok.
One of my favorite daydreams is to have Mr. Hamilton, Mr, Madison, and Mr. Jay suddenly show up in a joint session of Congress, and as H.L. Mencken famously said, spit on their hands and begin slitting throats. Figuratively, of course.
Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.
Er... run amok, not rub amok
RedBeard Saturday, December 5th at 12:24PM EST (link)Rub amok seems to hint at something a bit pornographic. Sorry.
Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.