I think Nanzi has finally taken complete leave of her senses. What was she thinking? No, please don’t answer that!

…among a flock of ‘em.

So is CNN, which called it a ‘vulgarity.’ The word in question was a three-syllable sexual slur – and, when directed against a man, a gay-baiting one.

TweedleDick and Tweedle Dum.

This is great.

Rangel, a man that I have met, is a nice guy, with ethical problems.

Stark is an ass, who is an extremists who hates conservatives, and has ethical problems.

If I had to choose which guy is better for conservatives, I would have picked Stark. This is going to be a political goldmine.

http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=10213

to lose. So why not put a nut job in there? They have what, a couple of months left until we kick their arse out?

They have a great idea for targeting dem big ticket funders.

Let’s do this!

about him, if there were something nice to say.

San Fran Nan, the political gift that gives almost as much as VP Biden.

She was actually able to find someone worse than Rangel to take his seat for a while. By making Rangel look normal in comparison he’ll probably have an easier time getting around his ethical shortcomings. Of course, now it is likely that by the time Rangel is no longer under investigation the Dems may have lost the House but long-term planning is not really their strong suit anyway.

Rules for /Radicals….Throw the values of the middle class back in their face, use it against them, confuse them
We think that maybe that Nancy would pick some one that wouledbe better than Rangel to weild the gavel. but no, she mocks the proicess and picks some one worse, someone apalling. she has no respect for the congress. More alinsky.

The naming of Stark, as execrable a piece of human debris as has ever graced the Capitol, is proof that she cannot think nor reason outside her little agenda-driven bubble.

That said, I look forward to a boatload of general hilarity as a result of her handing a big wooden hammer to that miserable cretin Stark.

And he looks like he is very shakey on voting against this thing. He is staing that the Senate bill is dead in the house, but he thinks that they can play fast and loose with the rules to put in any changes that they want.

that is the donks standing up for America and not voting on this.

She’d be saluting with an out stretched right arm and clicking heels sixty years ago. Just because we are Americans doesn’t mean we are immune to the dangers of fascism, socialism and even things worse.

Read my book. It just hit Amazon today. The photo of the cover is still being built.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=revolt+ray+wisher&x=0&y=0

of work, but when did calling someone a “fruitcake” become a federal offense?

Pelosi was pretty much locked into the choice, given the priority that seniority takes in these matters. Then again, seniority gives Pelosi an acceptable excuse for not picking someone else, because once she goes outside the senority protocol and picks someone else, she’s gonna tick off people.

Ah, sweet politics.

Ways and Means is a bruising assignment. If nothing else for the Dems, Stark (“Raving Mad”) is a seasoned pol and knows how to fight.

you put a gun in pete starks hand and he would shoot the people who disagree with him.putting him in charge of the ways and means.pelosi knows he is a head case and she dont care.its like lining up the republican party and let stark and grayson with swords and let them hack away.and there is no doubt in my mind they wont.nancy pelosi is a mindless obamaite.

Many factors are involved in these moving situations. 1. We have left God out of all decision making–human wisdom alone will not make it. 2. We have an elected leader of our country who diesires all power, that of a dictator. Regardless of who is in the House or Senate, he wants power over all. 3. We have an American electorate who is asleep, or simply don’t care. WE MUST REBEL AGAINST PEOPLE WHO DO NOT HONOR OUR FLAG OR OUR COUNTRY. 4. Where is our checks and balances in government. O, I understand Congresas. The Dems are like little sheep being led to the slaughter. They don’t have minds of their own to use..They are just lambs who can easily be led astray. 5. Too many in our Congress are registered as Socialisty or Communists..What can we expect?

I saw it on CSPAN about the time of this diary.

of the bullying Democrat elitist mentality.

I watched all three videos. Stark seems unhealthily concerned about the amount and source of education of those who try to communicate with him.

He went to MIT. So did my son. He was in the Air Force for 2 years. I was in for five. He has an MBA. So do I. I have never owned a bank. I think I’ll move to California and whip his a** in the next election. The little fruitcake.

He defeated his first opponent because the guy had been in Congress too long (28 years). Stark’s been in office 38 years this winter. And he’s only the 8th most senior member of Congress (maybe 7th now, with Murtha gone). Rangel has been in Congress half his life! Time for term limits.