The Amtrakization of GM


Right now the Obama team is swearing up and down that General Motors is only going to be a government property for a short time – a few years, at the most. But there’s nothing harder to kill than a federal program. There’s already plenty of evidence that both the White House and Congressional leaders view GM as a jobs program, rather than a company. In my column at American Issues Project, I argue that GM today looks a lot like Amtrak did in 1971:

Now that the Obama administration has taken General Motors under its wing, it’s worth wondering what the exit strategy is. How quickly will the federal government sell its stake in the company, and recover the tens of billions it has loaned GM? It would be nice to think the intervention may be temporary, but the America’s history with federal intervention into the private market is not especially encouraging.

It’s true that Uncle Sam nationalized companies during wartime, and spun them back to the private sector afterwards. But once you start to look at peacetime nationalizations and emergency programs, the record is downright depressing. One instructive comparison might be to Amtrak – as the arguments for nationalization and the promises of independence ring familiar.

Amtrak was established in May 1971, in response to the financial collapse of several intercity passenger rail companies. Congress and the President believed that intercity passenger rail service was a critical industry. Rather than allow companies to go out of business, they bought them out. A senior Nixon administration official projected that Amtrak ‘would experience financial losses for about three years and then become a self-sustaining enterprise.’ Nearly 40 years later, Amtrak continues to benefit from federal capital assistance and operating subsidies, with no end in sight.

Read the rest at American Issues Project, or check out my colleague TJ Brown’s piece on the death of private property.


Category: , , ,

RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

On the plus side

Return to Revolution (Diary) Friday, June 12th at 1:09PM EST (link)

there will be no need to build a museum. Amtrak is just that: it hasn’t changed in any way since 1971.

Out of hand Constitutional fetishist

 

Only With Massive Subsidies Will OGaMamobile

rcov092 (Diary) Friday, June 12th at 1:25PM EST (link)

be able to survive. Short of shutting down the import of any cars to the US. No one I speak to is willing to buy a government produced automobile. At least not the ones that remember the Yugo.

I do relish the thought of possibly some having the courage to name one of the models the zerO.

“Not One Red Dime for the NRSC or NRCC till they stop trying to elect liberals”

 

Amtrak or Conrail?

williemcbride Friday, June 12th at 2:17PM EST (link)

What is it about the GM situation that makes it more likely to end up like Amtrak and not Conrail?

 

Remember when the government took over running the Steel Plants

bobojake (Diary) Friday, June 12th at 2:52PM EST (link)

That was probably some of obamas’ relation that thought that one up. It obombed to. Probably in obamas genes to run a car company.

 

One Possible Future for GM...

DonPMitchell (Diary) Friday, June 12th at 3:27PM EST (link)

Goldwater: In your heart, you know he’s right

 

Why I am boycotting GM

JHancock (Diary) Saturday, June 13th at 12:00PM EST (link)

until it has 0% government ownership and less that 20% UAW ownership-I don’t subsidize socalism mow or ever. Ford is my new American car company, as they were the only one not to take govt pork (although they are still UAW). Or maby smaller brands like Tesla, Fisker, Panoz, SSC, Mullen, Mosler, and Saleen can go more mainstream and I can buy from someone who isn’t controlled by UAW.