I’ve started writing a regular column at the newly-expanded American Issues Project site. My first column is about the one constituency that seems to be skating past the current economic downturn: government workers.
While private sector employees are dealing with layoffs, threats of layoffs, loss of savings (especially retirement savings), downward wage pressure, and the promise of higher taxes, government workers are doing relatively well. Government is expanding and government wages are increasing – at precisely the time the private economy is hardest-pressed to support its inefficiencies. Government workers basically enjoy lifetime job security and the knowledge that their wages and benefits will generally do nothing but increase. There is a fundamental unfairness here:
This question is important not only because federal jobs are tough to eliminate, but because they are so expensive. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the average U.S. private sector employee receives a total of approximately $53,000 annually in total compensation – including salary and benefits. The average federal employee receives twice that. Further, under the structure of the current federal retirement system, civil service employees enjoy a generous defined-benefit retirement plan which encourages them to ‘take the money and run.’ In the next few years a huge wave of federal employees is expected to retire – and take generous retirement packages with them. Many will then look to cash in on their federal service with high-paying private sector jobs. Congressman Darrel Issa – the senior Republican on the House Committee on Government Reform – is pushing Congress to take a close look at this issue.
The problem is replicated at the state level. Like federal government employees, state employees typically earn significantly more than their private sector counterparts. While compensation varies from state to state (naturally), many enjoy generous benefit packages that far outstrip those available to many private-sector earners. And because of the political clout of public employee unions, some elected officials are currently debating how best to make up shortfalls in public employee retirement funds. There is no corresponding effort to do the same for private sector workers who’ve seen their retirement savings collapse. They seem to be out of luck.
It’s not demeaning or disrespectful to civil service employees to ask why they’re getting such a good deal when others are struggling. Federal employees secure the national defense, guard the safety of our food, care for the elderly and infirm, and explore new frontiers. It’s appropriate to salute them for their service. But this nation faces job losses, business collapse and persistent deficits – not to mention the ‘overseas contingency operation’ that used to be called a war on terror. Barack Obama and other national leaders frequently remind us that we must all do a little belt-tightening. It’s time to consider how the federal government – and its millions of highly-paid employees – can do their fair share.
This is an issue that’s also sound politics. We’ve never needed a reminder that Democrats are the party of government. Given free rein in Washington, they’re pushing though an unprecedented expansion. Yet the American people continue to support a limited government. Republicans shouldn’t attack government workers per se; many of them are valuable and dedicated public servants. But there’s no reason they should constitute some favored class.
Be sure to check out the revamped American Issues site. They have a number of extremely bright columnists and bloggers (including Ed Morrissey, Lori Byrd, Flip Pidot, Kim Priestap, and others). It’s worth making it a daily read.
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Hear, Hear!
leonidas Friday, May 8th at 9:33AM EST (link)In New York, a state that is in desperate financial trouble with the cratering of the financial services and media industries just for starters,, my understanding is that out of a workforce of 200,000+ people, a grand total (possibly) of 325 jobs have been eliminated!
One problem with the Federal Stimulus bill is that it allows states like New York to continue in their bad ways.
In New York, the State employees have by far the best deal of anyone (except for the boys at Goldman Sachs of course).
Leonidas
You've got that right, Leonidas...
zarathustra57 Saturday, May 9th at 11:29AM EST (link)The Teacher’s Union in New York, for instance, is out of control. I’m sure you’ve read about the so-called “rubber rooms” around NYC. Essentially, rather than lay off incompetent, or even dangerous, teachers, the state warehouses them for 8 hours a day, on your and my dime. Facing criminal charges? Thought to have had improper relations with a student? Unable to perform the basic tasks your job requires? Well, have a seat, read the paper, eat a donut, and the sucker taxpayers of New York will continue to pay your salary, AND your benefits!
Don’t get me started on the idea of tenure for K-12 teachers, either.
Just milch cows
jackbenimble (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 9:44AM EST (link)The government sector has gotten large enough in comparison to the rest of the economy where we have reached a tipping point in the balance of power.
They no longer work for us but rather we work for them.
We are all just a bunch of milch cows that must be milked as hard as necessary to ensure that they enjoy an ever increasing quality of life and experience no discomfort from nuisances like economic downturns.
“I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
More Unemployed
mas1916 Friday, May 8th at 10:25AM EST (link)Government workers must share in the national pain of unemployment.
With unemployment hitting new levels this week, it does not make sense that government workers should be favored – especially when government growth impedes private sector growth.
Interesting to note that the federal government decided to withhold the budget for closing Guantanamo detention center though. Should any of the trained killers held there be transferred to the US, a court would have the option of releasing them to join the ranks of people in the US looking for work.
For a bit of a satirical look at what work Gitmo detainees might be qualified for, you can hit:
http://firstconservative.com/blog/obamatudes/closing-guantanamo-top-ten-occupations-for-released-terrorists
Have you considered who?
SteveLA (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 10:53AM EST (link)Brian
I understand your comment, but have you considered this fact:
Overall, veterans hold 25.5 percent of nonpostal federal jobs, compared with 8.3 percent of jobs in the U.S. work force. That’s a slight increase from the 25 percent of veterans employed in government five years ago.
Source: Federal Times
While I do agree with you that perhaps employment at the Federal level seems immune from the realities of any economic downturn, cutting Federal employment would tend to hit veterans employment hard. Throw in the fact that many Federal jobs are covered under the AFGE which means last hired/first fired seniority rules which would tend to effect vets from recent wars hardest.
______________________________________
Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests
Umm, BTW
Warrior (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 3:30PM EST (link)Please don’t take this the wrong way, but shouldn’t that be:
“Competency over ideological purity”
Or is it meant as an ironic jest?
(None of this is meant as an attack. Please don’t take presonally.)
“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma
No worries
SteveLA (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 4:47PM EST (link)Yes it should be…thanks for the correction.
______________________________________
Competency over ideological purity and litmus tests
Stop Trashing Governement Workers
Greg (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 11:49AM EST (link)Trash the politicians that create all the job government jobs.When you are looking for work, you take anything to feed your children. If you don’t like government program then request the program to be killed. The statics you point out are bias in nature. Compare what a government work makes to equally to industry employee. What does an engineer makes in private industry to engineer in government. I want go into the unionized labor problems, but this is a problem across industry and government. Non-unionized government works on general don’t do as well in salary industry employees.
Government does very little that the private sector does,
Achance (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 1:14PM EST (link)and where it does duplicate the private sector, it probably shouldn’t be there. Consequently, comparisons of salary and benefits between public and private are meaningful ONLY if you match job for job and the match is down to the duties, not just the title.
It is legitimate to expect that government employee wages not go up at times when the general economy is stagnant or deflationary and if wages for a particular type of work go down for a significant period, government wages for that work should follow the market. Most governments have laws that set a market based pay policy however collective bargaining vehemently resists wage concessions and governments are rarely successfuly in achieving concessions. The unions just go into delay tactics and buy a new governor or legislature.
In Vino Veritas
We are discovering at all levels of government how many employees are non-essential
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 1:21PM EST (link)I am especially thrilled with the Charlotte school system for laying off only administrative paper pushers while the teachers teach. Who knew?
But the main reason I called the stimulus the government growthulus is that the only jobs it saves are government jobs.
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
That's another issue altogether. How many you pay
Achance (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 1:35PM EST (link)is more a factor of the health of the economy than how much you pay so long as the pay for the work is reasonably related to the market.
In Vino Veritas
A chance you could weigh in on this?
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 1:19PM EST (link)http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/05/08/states-rights-nullification-secession-race-and-interstate-commerce/
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
American Issues
Warrior (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 3:24PM EST (link)is a great website. Thanks for the tip.
“Racial criteria are irrational, irrelevant, [and] odious to our way of life.” — Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in the 1950 Supreme Court case of McLaurin v. Oklahoma
It's an endless cycle
kweiss01 Friday, May 8th at 5:06PM EST (link)And of course if you work for the government, what’s the likelihood you’ll vote for cuts in government spending? I don’t have any stats on this, but my observation is that most government workers I know (with the exception of those in law enforcement) vote Democrat, which of course is a big incentive for Democrats to increase the size of government and, therefore, their own power base.
Open your eyes
Greg (Diary) Friday, May 8th at 9:43PM EST (link)“my observation is that most government workers I know (with the exception of those in law enforcement) vote Democrat” with that kind of talk you will make republican party the party of exclusion and smaller and weaker. I have been in government for over twenty years and never have voted for a democrat or a bigger government RINO republican. I’m not in law enforcement either. I’m proud of the job I do for my country and have found other jobs during down sizing of the government. If I was better with my verbal skills I probable would not be in government work at all, but I’m a product of single mother and poor schools systems.
People tend not to vote against their interest
kweiss01 Wednesday, May 13th at 9:48PM EST (link)With respect, the more people who work for government, the fewer people will be inclined to vote for small government. Of course, lately Republicans have been just as “big government” as the Democrats, so this may not be a party issue, but I believe it is a “conservative” issue.