Why is Barack Obama So Unpopular?


As Barack Obama reaches the 100 day mark of his term as President, it’s time to pose a question: why is he so unpopular?

According to Gallup’s April survey, Americans have a lower approval of Mr. Obama at this point than all but one president since Gallup began tracking this in 1969. The only new president less popular was Bill Clinton, who got off to a notoriously bad start after trying to force homosexuals on the military and a federal raid in Waco, Texas, that killed 86. Mr. Obama’s current approval rating of 56 percent is only one tick higher than the 55-percent approval Mr. Clinton had during those crises…

It’s no surprise the liberal media aren’t anxious to point out that their darling is less popular than George W. Bush. But given the Gallup numbers, their hurrahs could be more subdued. USA Today’s front page touted the April poll results as positive, with the headline: “Public thinks highly of Obama.” The current cover of Newsweek magazine ponders “The Secret of His [Mr. Obama's] Success.” The comparison with previous presidents is useful because they are usually popular during their first few months in office – and most presidents have been more popular than Mr. Obama.

The Left in this country does not recognize that the Tea Party movement, the surprising strength of fundraising for GOP campaign committees and the Republican polling advantages in off-year races, all reflect dissatisfaction with Barack Obama’s agenda. The President himself continues to be more popular than his policies, but even that is changing – and it cannot last until the midterm elections. Of course, the longer Democrats choose not to recognize this, the more likely they are to pay the price politically.


Category: , ,

RSS feed

49 Comments Leave a comment

Not to be nitpicky

Jingles (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:19PM EST (link)

But the most recent Gallup poll shows Obama at 63% approval. Did the Wash Times mean Rasmussen, which currently has him at 56%?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html

 

Different polls...

Gyorc Nacain Tuesday, April 28th at 4:20PM EST (link)

pollster.com, which does a moving average of polls, has Obama at 62.2% currently. Looking at the article you linked to, that seems about average. Carter, Nixon, and Bush (43) were in the 61-63 range – Reagan higher, Bush 41 and Clinton lower. So this is probably somewhat of an outlier.

howdy Gyorc...I see the mere mention of the word homosexual has brought you out of hiding...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:29PM EST (link)

and to shill for Obama no less…are you ready to admit that you were being disingenuous the other day?

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


reply

Gyorc Nacain Tuesday, April 28th at 9:27PM EST (link)

first part of that…I don’t even know how to respond.

Second part…I was not being disingenuous, if you still wanna argue I guess I am willing (though I can’t dedicate too much time, what with finals and all). Though I think we pretty much reached an impasse.

But it'll have to wait till Bulls Celtics ends nt

Gyorc Nacain Tuesday, April 28th at 9:29PM EST (link)
 
 

Outlier or not

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:36PM EST (link)

Nobody since Joe Dimaggio has had such a relentlessly sycophantic press fan club. If Bambi can’t keep his poll numbers above 60 with a 50mph tailwind like that, after only 100 days and no major world-wide political event, that’s pretty pathetic.

Just wait till something genuinely bad happens.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

Every Book Store in our Area Has an Obama Shrine

papalee Tuesday, April 28th at 4:41PM EST (link)

I have even asked when they are going to put up candle racks so the worshipers can burn candles for Him. I do it every time I buy something so that they know it irritates their customers.

it's even worse in the kids history section! nt

mom2oneson (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:42PM EST (link)
 

His Average

Jingles (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:43PM EST (link)

Is still above 60. And is the Washington Times quoting the wrong poll? Rass has him at 56, not Gallup.

Different poll, Jingles.

Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:54PM EST (link)

http://www.gallup.com/poll/117853/First-100-Days-Obama-Meets-Exceeds-Expectations.aspx#1

Ed has some interesting arguments about it, too:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/04/28/is-obamas-approval-lower-than-nixon-and-carter/

Methodolgy

Jingles (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:02PM EST (link)

Thanks for the link.

Were the other polls cited in the WT Editorial conducted under the same methodology? I ask because the breakout of the approval numbers doesn’t appear to be the traditional Strong Approve/Weak Approve vs. Weak Disapprove/Strong Disapprove.

I don't know. Honestly, watching Lefties demonstrate that they didn't check their talking points...

Moe Lane (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 9:10PM EST (link)

…(I am excluding you in this, by the way) before using them is mostly what interests me at this point. :)

The President’s going to be popular. Until he’s not. And that’s going to happen with some dramatic suddenness,.

 
 
 
 
 

I don't get the point of the WT editorial either

Jingles (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:49PM EST (link)

All of the other polls have him in the high 50′s to high 60′s. Rass has consistently had him in the mid-50′s, but they aren’t the only game in town anymore.

 
 

I can't wait

Michael DeWeese (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:33PM EST (link)

for the day the polls shoiw his approve percentage is lower than his dissaprove percentage.
He will be ableto milk the pandemic restrictions for a while to on slower recession recovery now since it is starting to get to far into his Presidency to continue to blame inheritence. That will slow down his decline in the polls.

 

Obama's Numbers Will Continue To Slide

DavidSage (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:40PM EST (link)

Obama rode into the White House purely because of Bush’s unpopularity, and Obama still has a lot of “goodwill” from Americans because he just started the job. Americans also have their head in the sand about how bad the situation is, they have a false sense of hope (fueled by the MSM) that things are going to be “back to normal” in a few months by their new super awesome President.

Eventually however, Obama is going to have to take complete responsibility of the current economic situation, good or bad. He won’t be able to ride on Bush any longer.

Approval numbers can turn on a dime, Americans are very fickle. Bush had over 90% approval numbers at one point, only to leave office with a 35% approval rating.

The MSM has built up Obama to be such a savior, I think it’s inevitable he’ll be a failure. This economy is not going to bounce back anytime soon, and Obama’s policies will only prolong the pain.

I’m amazed that Bush had higher numbers at this point in his Presidency despite losing the popular vote in a very contentious election that had a lot of raw feelings.

With all the MSM is doing for Obama, this is as high as he can go. I bet Obama’s numbers will be in the 40′s by August.

You are right about a fickle public Bush's numbers...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:45PM EST (link)

were riding in the high 80′s after he took over Bagdad in 3 weeks time and they starting falling within months of that and never went back. They will turn on The One as the numbers of unemployed continue to go up!

 
 

This Has The Flavor

Joe Cor (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 4:51PM EST (link)

of whistling past the graveyard to me. You can pick out one poll where he’s below 60 and hang your hat on it, but for the most part polls show him to be very popular. Would Specter have jumped ship today if there were indications Barak is still not riding high in approval ratings? Would Democrats be on cruise control in passing his agenda if he weren’t high in approval ratings? Would Republicans in Congress be cowering in the corner if he weren’t high in approval ratings? (Well, scratch that one, they probably still would be.)

I think it’s deplorable. I don’t like living in a country where Barak is popular. But he is, and he will stay there, with a sycophantic media and a Republican party that can’t market itself and seems afraid of what it stands for.

Personally, I trust Rasmussen's numbers over Gallup and everyone else's figures...

conservativemusician Tuesday, April 28th at 5:10PM EST (link)

His polls are consistenly more accurate, especially more so than the CBS/NYT and Newsweek polls which always over sample Dems. If memory serves correctly, I believe Rasmussen was also the closest in predicting the 2008 presidential election final results. I think you’ll have to admit it is pretty interesting that Gallup (which I consider to lean more left) is more in line with Rasmussen’s numbers. If I were a Dem, this would cause me some concern.

Polls are as much a reflection of emotion and perception as they are facts..and to me, there is a feeling of derangement with the high Obama approval numbers. To his credit, Obama is by far the greatest salesman we’ve ever had as president, and this is saying a lot because Clinton had similar personal charm. However, realtiy eventually has to set in and his numbers will have to go down.

There were also a lot of Dems at the tea parties, which isn’t being reported, so I’m still remaining hopeful that people are starting to wake up and have buyers remorse. This also has to be part of the reason for Obama’s relatively low poll numbers at this point in his presidency as opposed to prior presidents.

 
 

I think this has gotta scare the poop out of Obama's handlers..

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:17PM EST (link)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Why?

rightinghistory Tuesday, April 28th at 5:39PM EST (link)

Let’s see . . . 24% of Republicans rate Obama’s job performance as “good” or “excellent;” a statistic that raises to 59% if you include “just OK.”

The same statistic among Independents = 77% . . . among Dems, 88%.

Yeah. Just frightening.

rightinghistory...I think you misunderstand..

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:48PM EST (link)

First look at the difference between the Dems and the Indies…that is a big difference…and the indies are trending with the Republicans.

Second Look at it as A B C D F…only 48% of indies gave him a B or better.

He is not doing well.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


No, I have it about right . . .

rightinghistory Tuesday, April 28th at 6:02PM EST (link)

It’s hard to spin a graph.

Indies are “trending” with D’s . . . if you accept the numbers as meaningful. If you don’t, then the graphic was entirely pointless to begin with.

And, of course, you would expect to find subjective differences between those with and without a claimed partisan perspective. Even most Republicans give him a passing grade — “C” or better — which, 3 months after a bitterly contested election, is very, very good indeed.

sure you do Ms. rightinghistory, here's your gold star!-nt

DONTREADONME (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:04PM EST (link)

wow...you are one ignorant lefty...

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:09PM EST (link)

I wouldn’t consider a C to be a passing grade in politics.

And the disparity between the D’s and Indies is staggering..so much so that it almost matches the Republicans.

You do know that the Republicans only have to move 5-6% of the electorate for your man-god to lose in 2012 right?

How exactly do you see the indies trending with the Dems?

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 

so a C is good I will guess you are public school graduate...yes?...nt

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:11PM EST (link)
 
 

or you could come from the other direction

paulincolo (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:50PM EST (link)

and say 21% of independents see him as poor or terrible. Could these swing voters swing the vote just 5% to elect republicans?

That said, I usually disregard almost all polls so far in advance of the next election.

 

I don't thnk so, rightinghistory

Neil Stevens (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:13PM EST (link)

A sarcastic Obama shill? Not on my watch.

Blam.

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Plus he can't add

Finrod (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 10:10PM EST (link)

77 percent of independents may rate Obama okay or better, but 97 percent of Democrats do, not 88.

Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?

 
 
 

Those graphs tell the whole story

izoneguy (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:39PM EST (link)

Most democrats have severe mental illness

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

Mental illness . . .

rightinghistory Tuesday, April 28th at 5:47PM EST (link)

. . . assuming you mean most “Democrats” . . . do the graphs also mean that most Republicans ( the 59% ) also have severe mental illness?

Actually, I think "democrats" is more accurate...

conservativemusician Tuesday, April 28th at 5:54PM EST (link)

And yes…they have severe mental illness. Look at the way they fawn over this guy. In your experience, do sain people do this?

Sorry...should have been "sane" people.

conservativemusician Tuesday, April 28th at 5:57PM EST (link)

Either way, we’re not talking about most Dems.

 
 
 
 
 

You don't like Barry . . .

rightinghistory Tuesday, April 28th at 5:34PM EST (link)

… we get that. But if credibility means anything, start with the right data.

Gallup — as others have noted — has Obama at 63%, second only (at this point in his presidency) to Carter at 69%. Americans give him a 66% rating for bi-partisanship efforts, and a 71% confidence rating for his economic efforts.

Sure, you can find other polls, but the lead post and the Washington Times site Gallup – incorrectly. When you only get your “news” from institutions w/ an agenda, you just might not know what’s really going on around you.

it is called "reading the tea leaves" Ms rightinghistory...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 5:54PM EST (link)

what I see is from the numbers is a highly polarized view of Americans on Obama.

"reading the tea leaves"

rightinghistory Tuesday, April 28th at 6:13PM EST (link)

Let’s pretend for a minute. Hey, how many six-year-olds prefer chocolate to strawberry ice cream? 71%? WOW . . . from the numbers, we have a highly polarized view of six-year-olds on ice cream!

People see what they want to see in statistics.

If your political worldview is correct, all Americans are highly polarized on everything.

Ms. righting history gold star winner of the day...

DONTREADONME (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:35PM EST (link)

it would appear that you did not look at the data the same way I did, I see three gaussian curves with one curve (Democrats) heavily balance to the high side. What I see is a polarized electorate. the independents and the Republicans have a normalized curve fading towards the negative with the independents favoring much more negative then the Republicans. So read the tea leaves as you will Oracle of Delphi, but do not expect us to role over for your view.

 
 
 

Different poll metrics used

mikefisk (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:01PM EST (link)

The polls that use registered voters as a basis for calculating approval ratings all have Obama between 55-60%… it’s only when expanding to all adults that his numbers get into the mid-60s.

Personally, if those with no stake in the political process are swinging polls that strongly for somebody, I start wondering what they know that we don’t, or vice versa.

“Once within the maw of Leviathan, degree of digestion is irrelevant.” – Michael Fisk

9.25, -4.77

 
 

Why is the Washington Times piece is so bad

McKinley (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:00PM EST (link)

Aside from the fact that it cites an incorrect poll. What is the point of the talking point that Obama’s approval ratings with Nixon/Ford/Carter/Reagan/Bush/Clinton/Bush aside from that Obama’s not the bipartisan savior his opponents say his supporters claims he is?

A 60 percent approval rating for a president is higher than anything this country has seen since 2003. That is significant and is really the only number I imagine the public cares about.

A 60% approval rating is is higher than anything seen since the last president.

Vegas_Rick (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:08PM EST (link)

Wow!?

“God is great, beer is good and people are crazy.”- Billy Currington

“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful people with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan ‘press on’ has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race.” Calvin Coolidge.

 

No, it's not really significant at all (nt)

Neil Stevens (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:10PM EST (link)

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

 

Well McKinley his approval rating is JUST 60 percent...

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:14PM EST (link)

with 13 covers on Time nonstop media attention and that is the best he can GARNER and you think that is somehow good? Bush had the same and the media HATED him!!! You all just can’t accept that American’s are just not that taken with The One….mark my words by the end of this hot summer his numbers will be in the 40′s!

 

this coming from the guy who just two weeks ago said that Speter is the best we can get in PA....

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:18PM EST (link)

Yeah…I won’t be looking to you for reason or logic anytime soon.

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


Mea Culpa on that, Gardner

McKinley (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 10:20PM EST (link)

Given the sharp disparities between Democrat and Republican opinion of the executive, it would be better to argue that Obama’s election has done nothing to stop the political polarization of the country, indeed, his first 100 days has only abetted it as other polls show Republicans willing to give the executive a chance at his inauguration are now disapporving. That being said, Obama’s first few months of office have earned him the deserved ire of conservatives, making me think of Winston Churchill’s quote about those who have enemies are at least ambitious and somewhat affective in pushing their agenda.

What are moderates saying when they claim they “approve of the job the president is doing?” Is it an endorsement of his policies or the traditional deference to a new executive beginning his term under such dire economic conditions that some political scientists might say provoke a “rally effect.” We need to take him down 15 or so points to be politically viable in 2010. Fortunately, the longer you govern, the more mistakes you make and the more groups you disappoint. Absent a war or a strong economy, few presidents enjoy high levels of approval on reputation alone and if Obama’s foreign and economic policies are as counterproductive to peace and prosperity as we suspect, we should see those numbers start sliding by the end of the summer.

In this case, comparing Obama’s approval numbers to those of his predecessors is spurious. The approval ratings for Republicans in Congress are also at an alltime low. This, couped with the comparably, and later, historically, low approval ratings Bush suffered starting in early 2004 provides Obama some practical leeway, in my mind.

 
 
 

Even the Fox News poll

dsm Tuesday, April 28th at 6:14PM EST (link)

from last week has him at 62% approval, asking the question as straightforward as possible: “Do you approve or disapprove of the job Barack Obama is doing as president?”

This seems much more direct than Gallup’s choices of Excellent, Good, Just Okay, Poor, Terrible, and No Opinion. How are we supposed to count “Just Okay” which got 23%? The 56% cited is only the total of Excellent (23%) and Good (33%). I think the poll has two many choices to compare it to other polls.

 

A Million Distortions in 100 days by obama

bobojake (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 6:15PM EST (link)

Distortions = Lies
10 trillion dollars of debt in 100 days on his futre great grand children, your great grand children and my great grand children.
You and me Care what is pile on our great grand children obama doesn’t

 

Story Factually Wrong

luckyerik Tuesday, April 28th at 7:46PM EST (link)

Obama’s numbers in the Gallup poll are higher than George Bush 58%, Bill Clinton 55%, and GW Bush 56%. Only Ronald Reagan had higher numbers 67% in the past thirty years for the first One Hundred days.

actually I think you just didn't read it....nt

Aaron Gardner (Diary) Tuesday, April 28th at 8:00PM EST (link)

conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!

“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat


 
 

WSJ/NBC Poll

reaganlover Tuesday, April 28th at 8:36PM EST (link)

I heard there is a new WSJ/NBC poll. I won’t watch the Obama News Network on a full stomach, so I am curious if any of you know the results.

 

What is scary to me

arel Wednesday, April 29th at 8:21AM EST (link)

is Americans; regardless of party affiliation, still can’t see what Obama and the rest of his posse are running towards government controlled banks and they are not even trying to hide the facts. When banks are not able to pay back loans because they don’t pass Obama’s “stress test” it only means one thing. He wants the stocks to go common so he has control of the banks and that is a scary thing. People better wake up and take a good look at what they voted for because change is coming and it is not going to be for the better. This is just the beginning.

Arel