Arlen Specter Defends Rush Limbaugh.. Sort Of


Can You Defend Someone While You're Patronizing?

Arlen Specter is clearly trying to do what it takes to win his primary race against Pat Toomey. It’s hard to imagine him defending Rush Limbaugh – even in this halfhearted way – otherwise. It also suggests that he’s not expecting to be running in an open primary next year, and is instead planning to win a majority of Republican votes.

Howard Stern: …that crackpot Rush Limbaugh. Creep.
Specter: I never attack prominent radio personalities like Howard Stern or anybody else or people who buy ink by the barrel.
Stern: You okay with Limbaugh? You like him?
Specter: Do I like Rush Limbaugh?
Stern: Limbaugh, yeah.
Specter: Yeah, I like him.
Stern: You do?
Specter: Yeah.
Stern: You met with him?
Specter: Yes, I have.
Stern: Is he a crackpot?
Specter: No. No, he’s not a crackpot.
Stern: He’s an enemy of the country.
Specter: Nah. No, he’s not. He’s expressing his opinions.
Stern: He wants the president to do poorly.
Specter: Now, Howard, I –
Stern: Wait a second. Senator –
Specter: Howard, I once heard someone criticize you.
Stern: Well, you don’t see him around any more do you? Don’t ask where he went. Senator, wait a second, in all serious, he wants the president to do poorly. Listen, I never voted for Bush but I always wanted to see him do well. I’m an American. I want my president to be successful. Who says “I don’t want my president to do well?” That’s anti-American.
Specter:: Well, I haven’t heard Rush Limbaugh say that but there’s a lot of talk which is provocative. There’s a lot of comment. You fellows – and I know this doesn’t apply to you, Howard –
Stern: Of course not.
Specter: Probably doesn’t apply to Rush. But some of these talk shows guys want to attract an audience.
Quivers: Oh. Is that what they’re up to?
Stern: I don’t want to do that.
Specter: The more provocative –
Stern: That’s true.
Specter: The more audience, the more [crosstalk], the more money.
Stern: But we are Americans –

Specter doesn’t really say anything good about Limbaugh, per se, but it probably represents movement on his part. At the same time, it’s hard to believe he doesn’t know what Rush Limbaugh actually said about wanting Obama to fail; for him to beg off with a lame comment like ‘I haven’t heard him say that’ comes across as disingenuous. In the same way, he won’t win any votes among Limbaugh listeners by suggesting he’s nothing but a conservative shock jock, intent on building an audience by creating controversy. Rather than thinking of Limbaugh as a conservative Howard Stern (so to speak), he might want to think of him as a conservative NPR; Limbaugh says what he says not to start a fight, but because he actually believes it.

While this baby step is welcome, it’ll take more to convince Pennsylvania Republicans that they’re better off with Arlen Specter than Pat Toomey


Category: , ,

RSS feed

6 Comments Leave a comment

Got that right

fishbreath (Diary) Wednesday, April 8th at 10:57AM EST (link)

Speaking as a Pennsylvania Republican, Specter’d basically have to walk on water (which he would then proceed to turn to wine) to convince me to vote for him.

 

Stern still has a show?

RoscoeP Wednesday, April 8th at 11:01AM EST (link)

I didn’t know. I guess I haven’t watch E! in a while. Isn’t TIVO great? Howard, thanks for continuing to contribute to the dumbing down of America . . .

 

It's only about the 5th time.....

texas214 (Diary) Wednesday, April 8th at 12:14PM EST (link)

in the past several weeks I’ve thought of the Casablanca line ” shocked to find theres gambling in Casablanca”. For Stern and Quivers to question a radio host being “provocative” is the funniest part of the whole read.

Atleast Specter didn’t let Stern roll him on this.

 

Stern's dumb or dishonest (ok, maybe both) ...

BD57 (Diary) Wednesday, April 8th at 2:31PM EST (link)

Stern’s either ignorant (if he believes what he’s saying) or disingenuous (which seems more likely).

What Limbaugh was saying, of course, was he didn’t want Obama to succeed in implementing policies which Limbaugh believes will harm the nation.

I’d love to see what Stern had to say about Bush on faith-based initiative, stem-cell research, Iraq, etc …. I’d love to see whether Stern supported Bush in every instance because, after all, he wanted the President to succeed.

By Stern’s formulation, there’d be no logical justification for opposing Obama on any policy – we’re all supposed to want him to succeed, right? If that’s true, then anyone trying to prevent him from succeeding is unpatriotic, etc. and so on. Right?

 

While I can appreciate Stern saying that he never...

Matt Genk (Diary) Wednesday, April 8th at 3:52PM EST (link)

wanted Bush to fail, I’m sure Mr. Stern did want those policies which Mr. Stern objected to – to fail.

“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” – George Orwell, Politics and the English Language, 1946

 

Liar and a Hack

jimmuy8 (Diary) Wednesday, April 8th at 9:20PM EST (link)

I’m pretty sure Stern never, ever expressed “I always wanted to see him do well. I’m an American. I want my president to be successful” during the Bush years.

And he darn sure never dressed anyone down for the things they said about Bush.

In short: Liar and a hack.

I’d be happy to be proved wrong but, I am getting so sick and tired of this phony patriotism that is so trendy amongst the left these days.