<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPost: Obama is Nixonian In Concentration of Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:34:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: icbm</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>icbm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>To challenge the usurpation of the national govt, it would be more effective for a state pick a particular issue and stick with it, even if the Supreme Court goes against the state.  In order to achieve any measure of success, you would need not only a governor with determination like General Washington, but a super-majority of state legislative support, and, ideally, the support of several other state legislatures and governors.  The political conflict would continue for years, and might even come to the use of national force against the state, so the state needs to be prepared for all possibilities.  (I wouldn&#039;t suggest responding with force, but with peaceful resistance, and continuing the battle politically.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To challenge the usurpation of the national govt, it would be more effective for a state pick a particular issue and stick with it, even if the Supreme Court goes against the state.  In order to achieve any measure of success, you would need not only a governor with determination like General Washington, but a super-majority of state legislative support, and, ideally, the support of several other state legislatures and governors.  The political conflict would continue for years, and might even come to the use of national force against the state, so the state needs to be prepared for all possibilities.  (I wouldn&#8217;t suggest responding with force, but with peaceful resistance, and continuing the battle politically.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OccamsRazor</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>OccamsRazor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>Then the cities, towns, homes, and ultimately...the People. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then the cities, towns, homes, and ultimately&#8230;the People. <img src='http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaded</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>from the federal government and give it back to the states.....period!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the federal government and give it back to the states&#8230;..period!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DerKrieger</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>DerKrieger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>is the only means by which we can bring the Federal government to heel. Red states need to pass bill similar to what OK is trying to do (http://townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/07/16/oklahoma_rebellion). If Liberals want to sink their states, let them. Under Federalism they won&#039;t be ale to bring down the entire nation. The Founders never intended for the Fed to have so much power. The states were to be the &quot;laboratories of democracy&quot; free to fail or succeed on their own. Federalism works to keep taxes and regulation low by allowing citizens to leave an oppressive state for a more friendly state. The Democrats, and Leftists around the world (EU) always strive to centralize power and increase the number of layers between the governors and the governed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the only means by which we can bring the Federal government to heel. Red states need to pass bill similar to what OK is trying to do (http://townhall.com/columnists/WalterEWilliams/2008/07/16/oklahoma_rebellion). If Liberals want to sink their states, let them. Under Federalism they won&#8217;t be ale to bring down the entire nation. The Founders never intended for the Fed to have so much power. The states were to be the &#8220;laboratories of democracy&#8221; free to fail or succeed on their own. Federalism works to keep taxes and regulation low by allowing citizens to leave an oppressive state for a more friendly state. The Democrats, and Leftists around the world (EU) always strive to centralize power and increase the number of layers between the governors and the governed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: in_awe</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator>in_awe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2480</guid>
		<description>In my brief lifetime I have seen the steady erosion of the Founding Father&#039;s principles and commitment to the Constitution.

The Courts have all but abandoned any reference to the Constitution, likewise the Congress and Executive Branch. We feel the rumblings of a reintroduced Fairness Doctrine, the crushing affect of political pressure against anyone who voiced opposition to Obama, the haughty disdain shown by the incoming administration to pointed questions from reporters. Last week most liberals lined up behind the actions of Harry Reid and various Illinois officials in opposing the seating of a legitimately appointed Senator. Do we really want to empower the Senate Majority Leader with the power to admit or turn away Senators solely on political motivations?

This concentration of power and the creation of a &quot;super cabinet&quot; beyond review and confirmation by the Congress and vesting in it powers rightly assigned to cabinet officers is scary. Liberals will see it as sinply an expedient way to achieve badly needed ends. But it opens a Pandora&#039;s Box that this nation should want to avoid.

So much for the vaunted constitutional law professor restoring rspect for the Constitution and the rule of law in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my brief lifetime I have seen the steady erosion of the Founding Father&#8217;s principles and commitment to the Constitution.</p>
<p>The Courts have all but abandoned any reference to the Constitution, likewise the Congress and Executive Branch. We feel the rumblings of a reintroduced Fairness Doctrine, the crushing affect of political pressure against anyone who voiced opposition to Obama, the haughty disdain shown by the incoming administration to pointed questions from reporters. Last week most liberals lined up behind the actions of Harry Reid and various Illinois officials in opposing the seating of a legitimately appointed Senator. Do we really want to empower the Senate Majority Leader with the power to admit or turn away Senators solely on political motivations?</p>
<p>This concentration of power and the creation of a &#8220;super cabinet&#8221; beyond review and confirmation by the Congress and vesting in it powers rightly assigned to cabinet officers is scary. Liberals will see it as sinply an expedient way to achieve badly needed ends. But it opens a Pandora&#8217;s Box that this nation should want to avoid.</p>
<p>So much for the vaunted constitutional law professor restoring rspect for the Constitution and the rule of law in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack_Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack_Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2478</guid>
		<description>When a liberal compares anyone else, liberal or otherwise, to Nixon. Unlike Godwin&#039;s Law, when one does this in an argument the argument is onsidered to be won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a liberal compares anyone else, liberal or otherwise, to Nixon. Unlike Godwin&#8217;s Law, when one does this in an argument the argument is onsidered to be won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icbm</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>icbm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>For a president nowadays, unity, secrecy, and dispatch may be crucial domestically (though not as crucial as in foreign affairs), requiring the assistance of a few key advisors more often than that of an ever-growing cabinet of department secretaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a president nowadays, unity, secrecy, and dispatch may be crucial domestically (though not as crucial as in foreign affairs), requiring the assistance of a few key advisors more often than that of an ever-growing cabinet of department secretaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>The supercabinet is what I&#039;ve long advocated for Republican executives as a way to get around confirmation and to overwhelm bureaucritic turf battles and inertia.

Either leave the appointee position vacant or put some nice, confirmable guy in there with the full understanding that if he even hints at actually doing his job, he&#039;s fired.  Then, run the agency from the mayor or governor&#039;s office or from the White House as the case may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The supercabinet is what I&#8217;ve long advocated for Republican executives as a way to get around confirmation and to overwhelm bureaucritic turf battles and inertia.</p>
<p>Either leave the appointee position vacant or put some nice, confirmable guy in there with the full understanding that if he even hints at actually doing his job, he&#8217;s fired.  Then, run the agency from the mayor or governor&#8217;s office or from the White House as the case may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10ksnooker</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/2009/01/08/wpost-obama-is-nixonian-in-concentration-of-power/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>10ksnooker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/brianfaughnan/?p=368#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>And his Kenyan Obammunism is bad for America and its freedom and liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And his Kenyan Obammunism is bad for America and its freedom and liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

