At a time when I thought my “Outrage Meter” had peaked, the Dems decide to begin “DEEMING” laws into existence.

We are becoming a Monarchy…with Queen Piglosi’s first royall decree being: “I and I alone will decide on your health choices!”

FOAD, Queenie…and the sooner the better!

Inform your representatives in no uncertain terms that you will not be fooled by procedural trickery. And to proceed with the Slaughter option is clearly unconstitutional and therefore unacceptable.

We aren’t going to take it anymore! Congress must operate within the framework of the Constitution. Period!

as a means of passing the Senate bill seems a clear violation of Art I, Sec 7 of the Constitution. This sleight of hand trick won’t be enough to shield Blue Dogs from their conservative constituencies anyway. That the Dems would even consider such a move is a sign of desperation.

Those that know, know. Those too ignorant to to care won’t catch on anyway. Those on the fence who really wanted change and healthcare have to be getting a little queasy, assuming they have any moral base.

Cantor and the others need to keep dragging the crime out into the light. No democrat in a swing state can hide behind it if everyone knows that is what he is attempting to do.

I think voters have learned a very valuable lesson. Never allow one party to control the government, especially the party that is infested with radicals from the sixties.

Let them “pass” it, or whatever new verb they are going to have to invent that covers moving a Bill on for Presidential signature while skipping clearly delineated steps, in clear and utter violation of the Constitution itself. They’ve hidden in the shadows of the culture and national zeitgeist for generations, pretending to be all they are not, and managing to thrive upon their own contradictions. But they did the one thing they could not afford to do: they achieved true power. And now the light is shining in, and people are paying attention. Let them be what they are. People need to see this.

Then, when they “deem” it passed, they can keep saying, well, we had the votes, so what’s the problem?

If voting isn’t required, why do we have congress?

---

Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots

Though I think Stevens and a couple of others would lower themselves to support an illegal extension of power here, it being a liberal illegality. If not and the fraud gets struck down, look to crazy liberals[?] to scream about judicial activism, which usually they like.
Except when they don’t.
Also, there may be some rather testy street protests from the now despised grassroots, at least I hope so. We can always say we learned that from the Left. People power and all that crap.

So, they are voting to enact a procedure to avoid a direct up and down vote on the Senate bill? Yeah, this is going to fly real good.

For all the so called moderates to go home say they voted for a bill the folks don’t like. Maybe telling them you really didn’t vote for the bill, just some slimey bypass to the constitution to hide like the chickens they are. Somebody better call the fire department because some Congressmen are going to get their butts roasted.

…Armed March?

The Democrats are attempting what can only be considered a coup and We the People need to take this into our own hands. We cannot count on the GOP to actually undo this madness. There are simply too many RINOs, moderates, and spineless jellyfish in the GOP.

I will NOT become any more of an indentured servant than I already am. Freedom to me is the abolition of Social Security, Medicare and any other federal program I support through the taking of my income and labor that redistributes that income to another citizen.

not stating clearly, and forcefully, that passage by the Slaughter process would not be recognized as constitutional by their party. That any attempt to enforce such a law would be met, first by civil disobedience, and, if necessary, violence.
If this is allowed, constitutional government is dead.

Let them do it … have the Parliamentarian rule on whether it is Constitutional or not … (I think not).

After which ‘if’ the President shall sign it, charge him with failing & circumventing his responsibility of upholding the Constitution of the United States … i.e. “High Crimes and Misdemeanors … or of trying to ‘circumvent and subjugate’ the legal procedures as laid down in the founding document.

Chris Wallace is a sorry excuse for the “fair and balanced network” , He let this Van Hollon spin the democrat party socialist drivel while keeping Erik Cantor on a leash.
Then we are insulted by smiling Bill Kristol and ditz Dana Perino representing the “conservative” part of Wallace’s talking points panel.
Good Grief! Fox is the only television network that might possibility report the facts of the unconstitutional process the socialist democrat party is pursuing.
However, the “guests” Fox News Sunday can’t / don’t get the message out to the folks!

…deem my taxes to have been paid, without actually having paid them — after all, I intended to pay them, didn’t I? My circuit court jury duty to have been served without actually having served it? Heck, I deem my Amex bill to have been paid; I moved it from the “To be paid” pile to the “Paid” pile, fer cryin’ out loud!

It was all I could do to listen to Van Hollen on Sunday…