Now that the feel good politics of the Blair House bipartisan Summit is over, the left is gearing up to lie and cheat their way to victory. Now claim may be bold, yet it is objectively true. The left is lying about the American people’s opinions on ObamaCare and they are cheating to get the bill passed. The next few weeks will determine whether the American people get ObamaCare passed against their will with no opportunity for a minority number of Members of Congress to protect the will of a majority of Americans.
The big lie the left will try and peddle over the next few weeks is that the American people want ObamaCare. The fact of the mater is that the American people have soundly rejected government run ObamaCare and the left will attempt to manipulate polling data to argue that the American people like elements of the President’s approach. Peter Fenn writes for The Hill:
If you listen to some of the Republican rhetoric on the public’s view of health care, repeated over and over, you would come to the conclusion that the American people are not solidly behind change in the system. Clever manipulation. In fact, what the American people hate is the lack of progress, the incessant back-and-forth, the gridlock. What the American people hate is watching the sausage being made, the side deals and horse trading, the refusal of the two parties to get together and pass a bill, the simple lack of action. Right now, 59 percent of Americans believe that the delays in passing a bill are more due to both sides playing politics and only 25 percent think it is more about Republicans and Democrats having policy disagreements.
The left would love you to ignore the polling date and argue that because the American people don’t like obstruction and gridlock in D.C., they love ObamaCare. This ignores the Massachusetts special election for Senate this past January where a candidate, State Senator Scott Brown, won on a campaign to go to Washington to obstruct and filibuster ObamaCare. Furthermore, it ignores a fact I cited in a previous ObamaCare post that every single poll indicates that Americans oppose the President’s plan.
(from a prior post) Quick reality check from Real Clear Politics Polls on ObamaCare (From 1/20-2/22 the average ObamaCare poll is 38.4 support and 52.3 oppose it for an average ObamaCare deficit of 13.9%):
- Rasmussen Reports – 41% Support – 56% Oppose
- Newsweek – 40% – 49%
- Pew Research – 38% – 50%
- ABC News/Wash Post – 46% – 49%
- Quinnipiac – 35% – 54%
- Ipsos/McClatchy – 37% – 51%
- NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl – 31% – 46%
- CNN/Opinion Research – 38% – 58%
- NPR – POS/GQR – 39% – 55%
- USA Today/Gallup – 39% – 55%
Fenn also argues that elements of ObamaCare are popular, therefore the plan as a whole must be popular. He uses polling data from the Kaiser Family Foundation to claim that people support elements of the plan.
76 percent support reforming the way health insurance works
72 percent support tax credits for small businesses
71 percent support creating a health insurance exchange/marketplace
70 percent support expanding high risk insurance pools
68 percent support providing financial help for low-/middle-income people
The problem is that according to this same poll, the same amount of people who support the bill oppose the bill. Furthermore, they attribute hatred of ObamaCare as one element of the Scott Brown victory, validating conservatives argument that the Brown victory was a defeat for ObamaCare. This poll looked at opponents of ObamaCare and found that the following three issues were a “major reason” for opposing the bill:
-
We can’t afford to pay for health care reform right now (73%);
-
The legislation gives government too big a role in the health care system (80%); and,
-
Too much of the process took place behind closed doors and involved too much deal-making (73%).
Any way you slice it, ObamaCare is unpopular. People don’t like the core of this bill — a government run health care system that is too expensive and was crafted behind closed doors.
The liberals are cheating when they claim that Reconciliation is not the Nuclear Option. Reconciliation is being used by the left because they can’t pass ObamaCare through the regular order. They want to rid the Senate of the filibuster and the reconciliation procedure, the Health Care Nuclear Option, is a means to get what they could not get when they followed the rules. Lefties at The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities claim:
Because rising health care costs represent the single largest cause of the federal government’s long-term budget problems, fundamental health care reform must be part of any budget solution. The foregoing examples indicate that using the budget reconciliation process to enact health reform in 2010 would be consistent with the ways in which Congress has used reconciliation in the past. Many major policy changes, including welfare reform, large tax cuts, and new health programs, have been included in past reconciliation bills. Moreover, if health reform is pursued through the reconciliation process this year, the resulting legislation — unlike the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 — will need to be designed so it does not add to the deficit. Any legislation also is likely to include provisions, such as an independent Medicare Commission and demonstration projects to identify ways to deliver health care more efficiently, that could lead to further reforms that slow the growth of health-care costs and contribute to longer-term deficit reduction.
Reconciliation is unprecedented and unusual for a few reasons. First, the left is using reconciliation, the ObamaCare Nuclear Option, as a procedure of last resort to get ObamaCare passed. It would be interesting for the left to produce other bills that have failed during the use of the regular order for a bill, necessitating Congress to resort to reconciliation. ObamaCare passed the House in November and the Senate on Christmas Eve, yet they are resorting to reconciliation because they know they can’t get one Republican to support the President’s health care bill in the Senate.
Second, reconciliation has never been used to amend a bill that has yet to pass. The Health Care Nuclear Option will be used to pass a new bill that amends the Senate passed version of ObamaCare. Finally, reconciliation has not traditionally been used to steamroll the will of the American people. The bipartisan Blair House Summit was merely some feel good politics before the real effort by Democrats to jam an unpopular ObamaCare bill through Congress using a the procedural Nuclear Option. The American people should take note that Washington continues to view their opposition with contempt and politicians would like you to believe that they know what is best for America.
Your federally elected officials are telling you right now — You shall get ObamaCare, whether you like it or not.
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
"the procedural Nuclear Option"
notonmywatch (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 5:53AM EST (link)“the procedural Nuclear Option”
yeah but it’s not called that now. When republicans wanted to get some judges to do the work of judges, THEN it was “the Nuclear Option”.
When democrats want to take over 1/6th of the American economy, it’s “reconciliation”.
It’s still morning in America.
The bright side of the Dems using the nuclear option
Spiral (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 7:46AM EST (link)The bright side of the Democrats using the nuclear option is that the Republicans, when they someday end up in the Senate majority, will no longer have any excuse to not use the nuclear option to confirm judicial nominees.
The way the Republicans allowed Miguel Estrada to twist in the wind just because a minority of the Senate, all Democrats, decided to engage in a judicial filibuster, was shameful.
When Republicans campaign for things like medical liability reform and allowing people to purchase health insurance across state lines, they never tell us, “Well, we support those ideas. But they will never happen because the Demcorats will filibuster those ideas and we will likely only have 53 to 55 votes in the Senate. We need 60.”
Basically, the Republicans play conservatives for fools. They tells us that if we work hard and elect Republicans, they will enact a conservative agenda. But then they fall back on the excuse that the Democrats always filibuster their conservative agenda.
At least if the Democrats use the nuclear option, the Republicans will not longer has an excuse to act like wimps based on the filibuster excuse.
The filibuster wasn’t envisioned by James Madison anyway. The filibuster began as a mistake when Vice President Aaron Burr deleted a Senate rule that was used to end debate and didn’t realize that this would make it nearly impossible to stop debate in the Senate.
The Obama Bread Lines
Very Good Point
WarEagle01 (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 8:40AM EST (link)I think if the Dems use the nuclear option for health care deform, it will effectively destroy the filibuster. Heck, most bills expend public funds in some way so this precedent set by Democrats opens up all kinds of possibilities if the GOP can take back Congress and the WH. In addition to getting our judges put in place without ever having to worry about Democrat opposition, think about imposing more restrictions on abortion, implementing the fair tax, tort reform, the list goes on. Unintended consequences are a b***h.
“A wise, doughy leg with rich tingly experiences will always reach better conclusions than will a more tanned, muscular leg that hasn’t felt those thrills.” –Chris Matthews’ Leg
“The alternative to the awful extremity of abortion is the indispensable joy of introducing this flawed world to someone who might make it better.”–John Hayward (AKA Dr. Zero)
"we can only do it if they've done it" MUST stop
notonmywatch (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 8:42AM EST (link)[republicans will] “no longer have any excuse to not use the nuclear option to confirm judicial nominees”
But we should stop reacting to them anyway. Their media dominance forces this reactionism, where “we can only do it if they’ve done it” and it MUST stop.
Because it doesn’t matter anyway. Their media doesn’t play history. It’s moment by moment, like massachusetts, “no appointing a republican by the governor” & then appointing a democrat in the exact way they said was unacceptable before. It’s just LIE after LIE & CONTROL MOVE after CONTROL MOVE.
You are never going to get ANYWHERE reacting to that. You MUST preempt it. Like this “jobs summit” proposed in response to obama’s healthcare farce – why isn’t every republican reminding the media about that every day, like they were?
It’s still morning in America.
I agree completely
WarEagle01 (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 8:55AM EST (link)and I think there have to be at least a few Democrats on the Hill who are now pondering the Pandora’s box of unintended consequences they will open by going this route. (I know, it may be wishful thinking).
“A wise, doughy leg with rich tingly experiences will always reach better conclusions than will a more tanned, muscular leg that hasn’t felt those thrills.” –Chris Matthews’ Leg
“The alternative to the awful extremity of abortion is the indispensable joy of introducing this flawed world to someone who might make it better.”–John Hayward (AKA Dr. Zero)
You watch, If The Dems Look Like They Are Going To Lose
Michael Dugas (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 6:51PM EST (link)the Majority they will vote to re-instate the filibuster before they leave office. NotOnMyWatch, they did the same thing in Jersey, the law said that after you were within a certain amount of time from the election you could no longer change or replace a candidate on the ballot, they changed the law so they could put Lautenburg on the ballot.
The Democrats have no respect for law, the rule of law nor the history behind them. They don’t consider them the tools by which a civil society governs themselves. To them they are tools to achieve totally selfish goals with not a care in the world if it’s to the detriment of their own society. Given the blatant corruption, thievery, cronyism and elitism of the political left I no longer even consider that their actions are motivated by good intentions….I no longer believe that at all.
You are witnessing a group, political in name but motivated by desire for power and control, try to take over it’s country through created crisis. They want to make themselves over as the saviors of society while they rewrite law and policy in such a way as to leave themselves alone and in charge and make this country’s population dependent on the government to survive thus dependent on them.
Am I nuts? My wife thinks so………
Funny how each and every day this administration makes me look less…nuts.
Intro to Federalist Papers; section 5;
paragraph 4.
“…dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the zeal for a firm and efficient government.”
Remember: A Citizen on the dole is a Liberal Vote at the Polls.
END ENTITLEMENTS!
Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum !
You left out the Left-wing Loons in the Media
newfreedomblog (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 8:44AM EST (link)We are not only fighting this battle against the democrats who controll Congress. We are also fighting the left wing media clowns as well. They are stoking the fires as we speak and calling for their liberal friends who frequent their internet sites to call their Senators and Representatives to pass this legislation.
Obama has a very powerful lobby on his side. The liberal main stream media and the vast network of liberal internet sites. We must go to these sites and stop them in their own game. Show in force how we will stop them and their agenda.
Here is one good place to start. http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/02/28/health-care-can-nancy-pelosi-get-it-done/#comments
It doesn’t cost a dime to voice yourself. We need to take the fight to their own liberal bastions. Speak out and let your voices be heard.
Contact@newfreedomblog.com
If they choose this path,
Mayhem (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 8:53AM EST (link)Then the GOP should feel no qualms about nuking the filibuster to overturn all this crap, once they run the government again.
James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.
Maybe, maybe not
wannabeanncoulter Monday, March 1st at 3:17AM EST (link)The thing about the Senate filibuster (actually, the threat of a filibuster) is that the majority party hates it and the minority party thinks of it as its only weapon. Since both parties know that they’re never going to be a majority party forever, they hesitate to nuke the filibuster when they’re actually in power.
It’s the reason why the Senate Dems didn’t nuke the filibuster when they had the clout to do so….
I do think anyone named B. Hussein Obama should avoid using “hijack” and “religion” in the same sentence. — Ann Coulter
I'm calling troll on this one. Oh, Neil, Moe;
Achance (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 3:20AM EST (link)this poster is not here in good faith.
In Vino Veritas
The eye in the sky is in motion (nt)
Neil Stevens (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 3:33AM EST (link)RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
League of American Voters
rsjt Sunday, February 28th at 8:56AM EST (link)is running ads in crucial districts to stop this very real threat to our freedoms.
http://leagueofamericanvoters.com/
You can help, Everyone can do something everyday and we will defeat this legislation which has little to do with reforming our health care system…
Stand up now or lose the nation you have known.
THanks for putting put the word on this.
earlgrey (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 10:55AM EST (link)I have been giving generously. After all with the monetary policy of this country the dollars won’t be worth much later anyway. Give what you can and feel comfortable giving. Let’s make it as difficult and painful as possible for the dems.
The Obama, Dem lies Ryan exposed are almost too numerous to count - LINK
Mike gamecock DeVine (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 9:12AM EST (link)http://www.redstate.com/brian_d/2010/02/28/lying-and-cheating-to-pass-obamacare/
Mike DeVine’s Examiner.com, Charlotte Observer and The Minority Report columns
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson
Does Not Matter.
bigalsouth (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 9:29AM EST (link)They don’t have to lie about anything. The Democrat Party Line is the following: “When the American People understand what the bill actually is, they will overwhelmingly support it.”
In other words, the Dems are banking everything on the American People rewarding them when they find out about all of the free candy that ObamaCare provides. Paying for it is never a factor to Dems.
Educate, vent, discuss conservative issues at
http://itsaboutliberty.com
Pelosi holds her own summit today
tngal (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 9:43AM EST (link)I had mentioned in an earlier post that Pelosi was not happy at the last summit because she couldn’t control it, and now it appears she’s controling her own summit today. Politico reports she’ll be on CNN and ABC and using the time to explain how her side has been accomodating. She’ll boohoo about how republicans have “misrepresented” what’s in the hc bill. One of the interviews is taped and apparently teapartiers will be called astroturf, again.
The only thing that makes sense is our side really, really, made them look amateurish during that summit. Our representatives came prepared with facts and they had storytime. She didn’t get the face time she wanted then,so today its all about her. Smile big for the camera Nancy!
The Nuclear Option will be used NOV 2010. It will logrithmic and far bigger then obama and the democrats ever dreamed of!! nt
bobojake (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 10:50AM EST (link)Public opinion doesn't matter.
Menlo (Diary) Sunday, February 28th at 12:21PM EST (link)The vote on the bill won’t change the outcome of any future elections. The election outcome will be the same whatever way Democrats vote. Even if it did, Republicans will always lack the numbers, passion, and the fortitude to undo whatever damage this bill could do.
The ballot box is not something in which to take any comfort; it is not going to be an adequate means to address this. We’re all going to have to refuse to buy anything called “health insurance” and refuse to pay the penalties.
“The ultimate touchstone of constitutionality is the Constitution itself and not what we have said about it.” -Felix Frankfurter
Kent Conrad says it's not reconciliation
mavericktime Sunday, February 28th at 12:28PM EST (link)Kent Conrad was on Face the Nation. He said that the Democrats will only pass budgetary elements of the health care bill through reconciliation. He agrees that it would be wrong to pass the entire bill through reconiliation.
I guess this assumes that the House is going to pass the already passed Senate bill, and then the Senate will just tidy up things through reconciliation.
Please, the terminology is confusing enough!
wannabeanncoulter Monday, March 1st at 2:54AM EST (link)The liberals are cheating when they claim that Reconciliation is not the Nuclear Option.
Oh gosh, don’t yell at me, but Reconciliation is not the Nuclear Option. Under the generally accepted definition, The Nuclear Option is an as-yet untried parliamentary weapon unleashed to end a filibuster. At some point during a filibuster in the Senate, the majority party calls a point of order and initiates an up-or-down vote on the constitutionality of the filibuster; only a simple majority is needed, ie, 51 votes versus 60. The Nuclear Option has never been launched.
Reconciliation is being used by the left because they can’t pass ObamaCare through the regular order.
Agreed, although I’d modify this to read “because they most likely wouldn’t be able to pass ObamaCare through the regular order.”
They want to rid the Senate of the filibuster and the reconciliation procedure….
I’m sure at this point Senate Dems would like to get rid of the filibuster, but that falls under the Careful What You Wish for Category. The Dems might hold back from eliminating the filibuster rule because they know they’ll be in the minority someday.
Why would the Senate Dems — actually, senators from either party — want to get rid of Reconciliation? Remember — it’s the House that actually funds legislation. Maybe I’m missing something here, but I can’t conceive of US senators eliminating Reconciliation. It just doesn’t make any sense because the Senate can’t actually fund anything.
….the Health Care Nuclear Option, is a means to get what they could not get when they followed the rules.
Please, don’t call it the Health Care Nuclear Option. Most pundits and reporters screw up the term Nuclear Option as it is. Call it the Health Care End Run or Health Care Hail Mary Pass.
Finally, if the House and Senate parliamentarians rule that the tweaking that goes on during Reconciliation of the House and Senate healthcare bills does not violate their respective rules, then the Democrats will have prevailed. It’s not sneaky, it’s not cheating, it’s not illegal, it’s not unconstitutional.
The answer is not to call it cheating and lying but to get more Republicans and more Conservatives elected in 2010!
I do think anyone named B. Hussein Obama should avoid using “hijack” and “religion” in the same sentence. — Ann Coulter
As yet untried?
Neil Stevens (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 3:30AM EST (link)That’s demonstrably false.
Byrd did it to drop cloture from 66 to 60.
So stop lecturing until you get your facts right.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
Do you mean...
wannabeanncoulter Monday, March 1st at 9:46PM EST (link)Byrd did it to drop cloture from 66 to 60.
Are you saying that Byrd actually used the Nuclear Option to create the Byrd Rule? Or am I misunderstanding your comment?
If Byrd had used the Nuclear Option to create the Byrd Rule, wouldn’t that mean that the Filibuster would no longer exist?
I do think anyone named B. Hussein Obama should avoid using “hijack” and “religion” in the same sentence. — Ann Coulter
Byrd invented the Byrd maneuver to break some filibusters
Neil Stevens (Diary) Tuesday, March 2nd at 2:48AM EST (link)He made it easier to break filibusters by doing what Lott stupidly called the nuclear option, but we really should have called the byrd option.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
This might be of interest...
wannabeanncoulter Monday, March 1st at 10:48PM EST (link)Here’s the link (pdf) to a 2005 report by the Congressional Research Service on the nuclear option. It’s about 30 pages long has lots of background info on terminology and key procedural points.
The Congressional Research Service has lots of good backgrounder pieces on legislative terms and procedures for both the House and Senate.
I do think anyone named B. Hussein Obama should avoid using “hijack” and “religion” in the same sentence. — Ann Coulter
ObamaCare Nuclear Option
Brian Darling (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 10:11AM EST (link)Using reconcilation in this manner to ram through ObamaCare is the ObamaCare Nuke Option. They are using it as a strategy of last resort and when used in that manner, it is a way to get rid of a filibuster on legislation that they can’t pass through any other means.
It is cheating, because it is a perversion of the reconciliation process. They are going to have to bend the rules and use reconcilation in a manner that it has never been used before.
I respectfully disagree with you, because they are lying about the polls and cheating by using reconcilation in a manner not intended when the procedure was created in the early 70s.
Who gets to decide?
wannabeanncoulter Monday, March 1st at 9:39PM EST (link)It is cheating, because it is a perversion of the reconciliation process.
Who gets to determine whether using Reconciliation in this manner is within House and Senate rules? Who has the ultimate say? I’m assuming it’s the House and Senate parliamentarians. If not those two, who then?
I do think anyone named B. Hussein Obama should avoid using “hijack” and “religion” in the same sentence. — Ann Coulter
Reconciliation is part of the Senate Rules. Nothing to do with the House.
nessa (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 9:50PM EST (link)There’s a good explanation of how it works by RealQuiet here.
“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Contributor to Unified Patriots
teh twitter
The VP apparently is the final authority
civil truth (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 10:03PM EST (link)The current concern is that he could commandeer the process, overrule the parliamentarian, and essentially rewrite the process with the support of a simple majority to run over all opposition.
Were that to happen, we’d be approaching Chavez territory.
And once you go down that road, that the rules change from here on out, which means the Democrats would be betting that they’ll never lose their majority.
We’ll see if they go down that road.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
billmayr
sarge324 Monday, March 1st at 5:57AM EST (link)as bill mayr stated the people are to stupid to know what they want.just do it even if you have to drag them to it.now that is what obama is doing with the aid of pelosi and reid.we better stay mad and in 2010 and2012 and vote out the totalitarians who want nothing but power.
Bill Maher is an American idiot
redpens (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 6:38AM EST (link)who pretends to be funny and pretends to know what he’s talking about.
We can use reconciliation to cut government down
redpens (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 6:31AM EST (link)to size. We can get of the EPA, Depts. of Energy, Education, Interior, FCC, FTC, quit giving money to the UN, cut Congressional salaries by 50%, opt out of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, oh and did I mention get rid of the IRS, only strict Constitutional judges, not activist liberal judges. Seems to me going nuclear has its’ advantages.
Obama's plan is failing
teridavisnewman (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 6:58AM EST (link)Obama’s plan is failing because it doesn’t address the problems of the majority of Americans. Rather than reducing the expensive and continuously rising cost of medical care, it has huge costs and rules that make no sense and creates another onerous set of entitlements. This is going to raise the cost of health care and bankrupt the country and Obama’s staff along with Congress are too stupid to realize this–and they don’t care because they will be exempt from it like every other law they pass such as ADA, Sexual Harassment, Discrimination and so on.
All the Obamunist plan does is add more people to the public trough for the rest of us to pay for. It’s an ill-disguised attempt to grab control of another 1/6th of the economy to go along with the stealing of GM from the stockholders as a payoff to the unions who put his unqualified butt in office and the banking industry in order to control who can get credit and loans. It’s game time folks and we need to send these people a mandate in 2010 by voting out all the incumbents!!
Teri Davis Newman
2010 Republican Nominee for Congress
2012 Candidate for Congress
12th Congressional District of Illinois
www.terinewman.com
Don't forget Congress is exempt from Social Security
redpens (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 7:22AM EST (link)and Medicare too
Rasmussen has approval for health care reform increasing
earlgrey (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 9:54AM EST (link)And opposition decreasing. I was disappointed with that after the summit.
Polls
Brian Darling (Diary) Monday, March 1st at 10:13AM EST (link)People still hate ObamaCare and those numbers will increase as people get to see what Congress is intending to do to health care. Remember, the President has not revealed the legislative text of his proposal and when Congress gets their hands on it — who knows what are going to be the next Cornhusker Kickbacks and Louisiana Purchases. Get ready for an Earmark feeding frenzy.