The House passed stimulus bill has a provision that will provide stimulus to criminals. No joke.
On page 52 of the House Stimulus Bill, “$3,000,000,000, to be available for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program.” The same provision is in the Senate bill, but for only $1.5 billion on page 42. These monies are dispensed by the Bureau of Justice Assistance at the Department of Justice for the express purpose of increasing safety in America. The problem is that some of these federal monies are used to allow criminals alleged to have committed serious enough crimes to merit bail to be released before trial — using your federal tax dollars to fund the program. This Byrne Grant provision if not changed can be called the Criminal Stimulus provision of the Obama Stimulus plan.
According to the Bureau of Justice Assistance:
The Byrne Grant program is a program of the Department of Justice to The Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Grant Program (Byrne Formula Grant Program) is a partnership among federal, state, and local governments to create safer communities.
According to Deborah Jallad, President of Accredited Surety and Casualty Co. in Florida some of the Byrne Grant monies are used by some counties in Florida, and presumably in other jurisdictions, to let those arrested go before trial, even if they are flight risks. Mission creep has morphed this program from a program for the indigent to a program for most of those arrested and it is driving bail bonds insurers out of business. Jallad argues that it is an inappropriate use of tax money, because the bail industry is doing the job effectively and wiht no expense to the taxpayer.
This is not an appropriate us of tax dollars. Expanding the budgets of taxpayer-funded pretrial release programs is not fiscally responsible when the private surety bail industry can be utilized to greater degrees at no taxpayer expense.
Furthermore, if this bill is to provide stimulus to the economy, Jallad argues that this provision may cause the opposite. More money for Byrnes Grants will cause unemployment in the private sector, because the government will take over a function ably being implemented by private enterprise.
The government should not compete with private enterprise — especially when the private sector is more effective. Private enterprise creates jobs, pays taxes and stimulates the economy.
If the goal of the stimulus bill is to create jobs, this provision will kill jobs.
Lawyers explain that the purpose of making a defendant post bail, or pay a bail bondsman to post the bail, is to ensure that a defendant shows up for court. The Byrne Grant program’s overall purposes is to protect communities, but some of the money will allow more criminals to skip bail while awaiting trial without the fear of losing a pot of money.
The reason for bail is set for an individual is because an alleged criminal is a flight risk. If the federal government has negated the need to post bail for alleged criminals who are flight risks, then it is more likely that criminals (which they will be when they don’t show up for their court date) will roam free before their court date. There is no financial motivation for the government to chase these criminals who don’t show up.
Only the left could consider putting more criminals in the loose to be economic stimulus. Dog the Bounty Hunter, call you local unemployment office.
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
Steve Maley
that one is easy to understand...
JLenardDetroit (Diary) Tuesday, February 3rd at 11:31PM EST (link)all those criminal Politicians in Chicago may soon be indicted by Fitzgerald… the big 0 (zero, not “O”) wants to be sure they have Bail money….
Regards from NoMoTown (the MOTORlessCITY)
“Liberals, looking to do for? America what they’ve done for? Detroit! which is DESTROY IT!”
“I think, therefore I am Conservative”
“Conservative by choice, Republican by necessity”
“You can lead a Liberal to the Truth/Facts, but you cannot make them THINK!”
“Romney [No, not my first choice] does NOT have a MORMON problem. He has a, far too many Americans; these days; are MORONS problem!”
Follow @JLenardDetroit
(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (message) (Warning: Children Will Die!!)
Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
“The first Liberal was Satan” – a Rush caller (other Quotes)
No provision regarding bail
I am a sociology professor who got his Masters in 2005. (Diary) Wednesday, February 4th at 12:40AM EST (link)It is monies reserved for criminologist and FBI research. It does not let the arrested skip bail. In fact, a significant amount of the money will go toward putting more police on the street.
Lots of problems in this bill. But I don’t think this one is it.
If you have come for my gun, rethink that!
Your are both correct and incorrect
Brian Darling (Diary) Wednesday, February 4th at 8:24AM EST (link)The Byrne Grant monies are used for criminologists and FBI research, but a county in Florida is using money to fund the pre-trial release of crininals. This is killing the bail surety industry in parts of Florida. This is a specific documented example of some of the monies being used for a purpose that will INCREASE CRIME. I do agree that monies are used for criminologist and research but not all. When you are appropriating between 3 and 1.5 billion dollars for a program, do you not fully expect waste, fraud and abuse of those monies. It is naive to believe that every dollar of every Byrne Grant is being used properly.
That is not in the language of this bill
I am a sociology professor who got his Masters in 2005. (Diary) Thursday, February 5th at 11:29AM EST (link)In fact, the proposal spends a lot of money on training cops. I think you are confused about what the money does. Provide a link and I will look into it. It is probably more likely that criminologists are studying pre-trial release. So, there is probably money that is allocated by the grant to pay criminologists to research.
It would be highly irregular for grant money to be used to pay bail. Also, if the money is going to pay for bail, then I don’t understand how that would negatively effect the bail bondsmen. According to your logic, grant money is being used to pay bail for people who would not normally post, which would increase revenue and not decrease.
Once again, I would stay way from this as a criticism because if people look at the bill they will not find any money for bail. Compared to the amount of spending in this bill I just don’t think that focusing on 3 billion dollars is going to get conservatives fired up.
Our reps are making the mistake of striking 46 billion from it and contending that they are attacking the core of the pork. So, in a bill that is estimated to blow up to over 900 billion, the best our reps can do is reduce it to 854 billion. I think we can find more pork than that. We are thinking way to small. 3 billion and 46 billion?
In a bill that is in the 900′s, cutting pork is reducing it by the 100′s, not the 10′s or smaller.
If you have come for my gun, rethink that!
Something else that is in the bill can literally KILL YOU....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Wednesday, February 4th at 4:54AM EST (link)from The American Thinker is this little nugget….
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/how_the_stimulus_bill_could_ki.html
“On page 151 of this legislative pork-fest is one of the clandestine nuggets of social policy manipulation that are peppered throughout the bill. Section 9201 of the stimulus package establishes the “Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.” This body, which would be made up of federal bureaucrats will “coordinate the conduct or support of comparative effectiveness and related health services research.”
They go on to explain why it will KILL you…
“Once a panel of government experts decides what is and what is not cost-effective by their definition, the government will stop paying for treatments, medicines, therapies or devices that fall into the latter category. Initially, this will limit access to very expensive treatments for federal employees, veterans, the elderly, members of the military and their dependents and others who rely on the feds to pay for their health care. But since this would place nearly half of health care dollars off limits for such treatments, the demand for and further development of such treatments would likely dry up. And Daschle wants to expand the Coordinating Council’s power even further, allowing the government to deny tax benefits for private insurance that covers treatments deemed too expensive by the Council. Thus, if a handful of government employees deem a therapy not cost effective, no health insurance will cover it and it will become virtually unobtainable to patients at any cost.”
Think about that for a minute the GOVERNMENT will be telling you what treatments you can and cannot have based on COST…..the same damn Government that has destroyed everything it touches the same idiots who can have the best damn care in the world at no cost to themselves because WE pay for it want to decide YOUR FATE!
Please oh please call your Senators and mention this particular part of the bill and INSANITY of it!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Criminal Stimulus
cmccoil (Diary) Friday, February 6th at 10:30AM EST (link)Government should not compete with private industry. The bail industry handles bail and does it very effectively. Rather than stimulate the economy, this portion of the stimulus plan could do just the opposite, by putting tax paying, working citizens out of business.
Criminal Stimulus
cmccoil (Diary) Friday, February 6th at 10:30AM EST (link)Government should not compete with private industry. The bail industry handles bail and does it very effectively. Rather than stimulate the economy, this portion of the stimulus plan could do just the opposite, by putting tax paying, working citizens out of business.