<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judd Gregg (R-NH) atop list for Commerce Secretary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: civil_truth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>civil_truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just be a modern revision of the old mocking question &quot;how many divisions does the Pope have?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just be a modern revision of the old mocking question &#8220;how many divisions does the Pope have?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue_Collar_Muse</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue_Collar_Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-186</guid>
		<description>here in Tennessee we have a new Republican Speaker of the House after taking over control of both sides of the Legislature for the first time since Reconstruction.

All the GOP Reps signed a pledge to vote for a GOP Speaker.  This was important because, while in the minority, several had voted for a Democrat for Speaker.

While not specified in the pledge, the unspoken promise was to vote for the GOP Caucus&#039;s nominee for Speaker.  That was Jason Mumpower.  Our new Speaker, Kent Williams, despite having signed the pledge and verbally committing on the radio to vote for Jason, got a sweet offer from the Dems and took it.

All 49 Dems voted for Williams and so did Williams.   He became Speaker and kept his promise to &quot;vote for a Republican.&quot;

If a squishy Republican would do this, I have no doubts a Dem would do it in a heartbeat.  Will Lynch?  I&#039;m not predicting either way.  We&#039;ll see when it happens.  But in cases like this it&#039;s often political disaster be damned!  Full Liberal speed ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here in Tennessee we have a new Republican Speaker of the House after taking over control of both sides of the Legislature for the first time since Reconstruction.</p>
<p>All the GOP Reps signed a pledge to vote for a GOP Speaker.  This was important because, while in the minority, several had voted for a Democrat for Speaker.</p>
<p>While not specified in the pledge, the unspoken promise was to vote for the GOP Caucus&#8217;s nominee for Speaker.  That was Jason Mumpower.  Our new Speaker, Kent Williams, despite having signed the pledge and verbally committing on the radio to vote for Jason, got a sweet offer from the Dems and took it.</p>
<p>All 49 Dems voted for Williams and so did Williams.   He became Speaker and kept his promise to &#8220;vote for a Republican.&#8221;</p>
<p>If a squishy Republican would do this, I have no doubts a Dem would do it in a heartbeat.  Will Lynch?  I&#8217;m not predicting either way.  We&#8217;ll see when it happens.  But in cases like this it&#8217;s often political disaster be damned!  Full Liberal speed ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terilyn Donaldson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Terilyn Donaldson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-185</guid>
		<description>on my mind for a week now.  Would the Dems really agree to appoint a Republican then not do it?  I mean, I realize they would not have any moral or ethical issues with that!  However, politically it would likely be a disaster.  Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on my mind for a week now.  Would the Dems really agree to appoint a Republican then not do it?  I mean, I realize they would not have any moral or ethical issues with that!  However, politically it would likely be a disaster.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praying</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Praying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I did email Gregg yesterday and asked him NOT to accept the position on principle. Not that he&#039;d listen to lil&#039; ol&#039; me from Tennessee, but it made me feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did email Gregg yesterday and asked him NOT to accept the position on principle. Not that he&#8217;d listen to lil&#8217; ol&#8217; me from Tennessee, but it made me feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-182</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how any &quot;conservative&quot; could serve in Obama&#039;s cabinet.  I know it is an honor to be asked and that generally one doesn&#039;t tell the President no, but this guy is such a rabid anti-American flat-out socialist that I can&#039;t see what a token conservative in his administration would be able to do that would actually be in line with his principles.

Any real conservative would have to say a polite &quot;thanks, but no thanks&quot; simply on the core of their convictions alone.  To say yes shows that you are a pawn and a power hungry sycophant.  Especially when your nomination weakens the already decimated GOP members of the senate.

This would be a disgusting display of power before convictions if Senator Gregg says yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how any &#8220;conservative&#8221; could serve in Obama&#8217;s cabinet.  I know it is an honor to be asked and that generally one doesn&#8217;t tell the President no, but this guy is such a rabid anti-American flat-out socialist that I can&#8217;t see what a token conservative in his administration would be able to do that would actually be in line with his principles.</p>
<p>Any real conservative would have to say a polite &#8220;thanks, but no thanks&#8221; simply on the core of their convictions alone.  To say yes shows that you are a pawn and a power hungry sycophant.  Especially when your nomination weakens the already decimated GOP members of the senate.</p>
<p>This would be a disgusting display of power before convictions if Senator Gregg says yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>eschristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-181</guid>
		<description>meet the criteria for a filibuster then what will?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meet the criteria for a filibuster then what will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-180</guid>
		<description>such as overtook them in &#039;94.  They will attack any conservative/Republican mercilessly if he or she dares to speak out effectively in opposition.  They will do something about Rush and conservative talk radio.  They will attack Red State governors with an army of auditors, inspectors, investigators, and the now well-rehearsed Public Integrity Section and its FBI agents and US Attornies.

They had the dreams they&#039;d had smoking dope in college dorm rooms in the &#039;60s dashed by Gingrich&#039;s counter-revolution.  It won&#039;t happen again if they can help it and so far, it&#039;s all going according to the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such as overtook them in &#8217;94.  They will attack any conservative/Republican mercilessly if he or she dares to speak out effectively in opposition.  They will do something about Rush and conservative talk radio.  They will attack Red State governors with an army of auditors, inspectors, investigators, and the now well-rehearsed Public Integrity Section and its FBI agents and US Attornies.</p>
<p>They had the dreams they&#8217;d had smoking dope in college dorm rooms in the &#8217;60s dashed by Gingrich&#8217;s counter-revolution.  It won&#8217;t happen again if they can help it and so far, it&#8217;s all going according to the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-179</guid>
		<description>when necessary.  Their reps and senators will vote as they are told on issues that are crucial to them.

I&#039;m quite confident they&#039;d have no problem finding a handful of Senators to vote in favor of either of your posits.  They would water down the Fairness Doctrine stuff and let the FCC ratchet it up and as far as guns go, it come in as the ability for local governments to act appropriately as &quot;their&quot; constituents saw fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when necessary.  Their reps and senators will vote as they are told on issues that are crucial to them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite confident they&#8217;d have no problem finding a handful of Senators to vote in favor of either of your posits.  They would water down the Fairness Doctrine stuff and let the FCC ratchet it up and as far as guns go, it come in as the ability for local governments to act appropriately as &#8220;their&#8221; constituents saw fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David123</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>David123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Enactment of the &quot;Fairness doctrine&quot; and purging the airwaves of &quot;right-wing extremists&quot; like Rush.

or

Gun confiscation
====
Also, if there is a 41+ vote fillibuster, there will be less pressure brought to bear on any Democrat who happens to vote his conscience and go along with the Republicans - even if he changed his vote the Republicans could still fillibuster.  If a fillibuster can&#039;t succeed without at least one Dem voting in favor of it, there will be tremendous pressure brought to bear on all Dems not to break ranks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enactment of the &#8220;Fairness doctrine&#8221; and purging the airwaves of &#8220;right-wing extremists&#8221; like Rush.</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>Gun confiscation<br />
====<br />
Also, if there is a 41+ vote fillibuster, there will be less pressure brought to bear on any Democrat who happens to vote his conscience and go along with the Republicans &#8211; even if he changed his vote the Republicans could still fillibuster.  If a fillibuster can&#8217;t succeed without at least one Dem voting in favor of it, there will be tremendous pressure brought to bear on all Dems not to break ranks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod_Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod_Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-177</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s now really a test of resolve on the part of Gregg whether to accept the position or not.

I don&#039;t envy Gregg&#039;s situation in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s now really a test of resolve on the part of Gregg whether to accept the position or not.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t envy Gregg&#8217;s situation in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Heck, even &quot;I&quot; realize I&#039;m only right MOST of the time.  :-)

My bottom line is that &quot;next year&quot; won&#039;t matter.  He&#039;ll have his agenda in concrete by June 1.  Health care might take till Nov 1, but he&#039;ll get that too.

By the time the squishies and the blue dogs wake up the rose garden will have been long plowed under.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, even &#8220;I&#8221; realize I&#8217;m only right MOST of the time.  <img src='http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My bottom line is that &#8220;next year&#8221; won&#8217;t matter.  He&#8217;ll have his agenda in concrete by June 1.  Health care might take till Nov 1, but he&#8217;ll get that too.</p>
<p>By the time the squishies and the blue dogs wake up the rose garden will have been long plowed under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue_Collar_Muse</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue_Collar_Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-175</guid>
		<description>such an esteemed Red Stater.  But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite as in the bag as one might think.

Only Obama knows what he has up his sleeve for later.  The one thing that is clear is that if history is any indicator, there will come a time when Buyer&#039;s Remorse of major magnitude will set in.  Obama is trying to set up the machinery so that even when it does, he has control and the votes to do what he wants.

Just because he is not likely to dissolve Congress and the Constitution and have himself granted emergency powers ala Hitler and Chavez doesn&#039;t mean his goal is any less similar.

He&#039;s taking nothing for granted.  It&#039;s a smart move and one that will probably work.  The GOP, far from doing their job from 80-06 merely played and the playground bullies are back and able to pick up pretty much where they left off.

I agree that Obama has the votes he needs today.  But he&#039;s thinking about the votes he&#039;ll need this time next year after even the Squishies can no longer stomach his plans.

My $.02</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such an esteemed Red Stater.  But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite as in the bag as one might think.</p>
<p>Only Obama knows what he has up his sleeve for later.  The one thing that is clear is that if history is any indicator, there will come a time when Buyer&#8217;s Remorse of major magnitude will set in.  Obama is trying to set up the machinery so that even when it does, he has control and the votes to do what he wants.</p>
<p>Just because he is not likely to dissolve Congress and the Constitution and have himself granted emergency powers ala Hitler and Chavez doesn&#8217;t mean his goal is any less similar.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s taking nothing for granted.  It&#8217;s a smart move and one that will probably work.  The GOP, far from doing their job from 80-06 merely played and the playground bullies are back and able to pick up pretty much where they left off.</p>
<p>I agree that Obama has the votes he needs today.  But he&#8217;s thinking about the votes he&#8217;ll need this time next year after even the Squishies can no longer stomach his plans.</p>
<p>My $.02</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-174</guid>
		<description>First, the Dems could renege. 

If I were the Dems that&#039;s exactly what I would do - tell Gregg whatever he wants to hear, get him to officially resign from the Senate, swear him in, and then force Lynch to appoint Shea-Porter (a very, very reliable liberal vote) to Gregg&#039;s Senate seat. 

I mean, what would happen if the Dems did this? Would Gregg immediately resign to a position he was just sworn into? Not likely! 

And there&#039;s virtually nothing Senate Republicans could do either. 

(If Obama were really smart, he follow up such a move by putting the full court press on Olympia Snowe to switch parties. Then the Dems could go ahead and force a seating of Franken before the court cases go to trial.) 

Second, if the Democrats were really smart, they would forgo all of the above, have Lynch voluntarily yield his appointment power, and have the NH State Legislature call for an immediate Special Election to replace Gregg. 

This second strategy is particularly brilliant because in now deep Blue-NH, the odds are extremely good that a Democrat would win any Special Election. 

And this scenario achieves the same result as the first scenario, with the added benefit of looking &#039;clean&#039; to the public. (Then they can *really* go after Olympia Snowe to switch!) 

Bottom line: Gregg is a fool and a traitor if he takes this position, and the Senate GOP will be in even more trouble with the base if they let him. 

This is very smart politics on Obama&#039;s part, and once again shows the shallow vanity of (most) Senate Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the Dems could renege. </p>
<p>If I were the Dems that&#8217;s exactly what I would do &#8211; tell Gregg whatever he wants to hear, get him to officially resign from the Senate, swear him in, and then force Lynch to appoint Shea-Porter (a very, very reliable liberal vote) to Gregg&#8217;s Senate seat. </p>
<p>I mean, what would happen if the Dems did this? Would Gregg immediately resign to a position he was just sworn into? Not likely! </p>
<p>And there&#8217;s virtually nothing Senate Republicans could do either. </p>
<p>(If Obama were really smart, he follow up such a move by putting the full court press on Olympia Snowe to switch parties. Then the Dems could go ahead and force a seating of Franken before the court cases go to trial.) </p>
<p>Second, if the Democrats were really smart, they would forgo all of the above, have Lynch voluntarily yield his appointment power, and have the NH State Legislature call for an immediate Special Election to replace Gregg. </p>
<p>This second strategy is particularly brilliant because in now deep Blue-NH, the odds are extremely good that a Democrat would win any Special Election. </p>
<p>And this scenario achieves the same result as the first scenario, with the added benefit of looking &#8216;clean&#8217; to the public. (Then they can *really* go after Olympia Snowe to switch!) </p>
<p>Bottom line: Gregg is a fool and a traitor if he takes this position, and the Senate GOP will be in even more trouble with the base if they let him. </p>
<p>This is very smart politics on Obama&#8217;s part, and once again shows the shallow vanity of (most) Senate Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s got a filibuster proof majority NOW.  Name me one issue, including a bill that would require summary execution of Republican Senators (which I personally would not oppose), that we count on all 41 - assuming Coleman prevails - Republicans to support cloture?

Won&#039;t happen.

Tax cheats to cabinet level positions?  Nope.
Perjurers for AG?  Nope.
SCOTUS Justices of any liberal stripe?  Nope.
A trillion dollar &quot;stimulus&quot; bill that doesn&#039;t stimulate?  Nope.

There&#039;s lots of reasons to say Gregg shouldn&#039;t accept a cabinet position in this administration.  60 votes ain&#039;t one of &#039;em.

And BO&#039;s already got &quot;bipartisan&quot; covered with Gates and whats-his-name the faux Republican retired congresscritter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s got a filibuster proof majority NOW.  Name me one issue, including a bill that would require summary execution of Republican Senators (which I personally would not oppose), that we count on all 41 &#8211; assuming Coleman prevails &#8211; Republicans to support cloture?</p>
<p>Won&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>Tax cheats to cabinet level positions?  Nope.<br />
Perjurers for AG?  Nope.<br />
SCOTUS Justices of any liberal stripe?  Nope.<br />
A trillion dollar &#8220;stimulus&#8221; bill that doesn&#8217;t stimulate?  Nope.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s lots of reasons to say Gregg shouldn&#8217;t accept a cabinet position in this administration.  60 votes ain&#8217;t one of &#8216;em.</p>
<p>And BO&#8217;s already got &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; covered with Gates and whats-his-name the faux Republican retired congresscritter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue_Collar_Muse</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue_Collar_Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-172</guid>
		<description>that Gregg has accepted under those terms.

It is, thus, not the disaster it could have been but it fails to be any sort of victory for the GOP and the people of our country.  Obama and the Left are marginalizing GOP principles and the ability the party has to push for them.

Once they gain enough ground outside the electoral process, they will abandon any pretense to bi-partisanship for autocracy.  If Obama truly wanted bi-partisanship there are any number of others he could appoint to Commerce or offer the job.  Walter Williams comes to mind.  The reasons why WW wasn&#039;t offered the job are immediately apparent.

This was a fork move against the GOP that was successful at only the lowest level now.  Who knows how it may play out eventually?  In any event, this will not be Obama&#039;s only attempt at subversion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that Gregg has accepted under those terms.</p>
<p>It is, thus, not the disaster it could have been but it fails to be any sort of victory for the GOP and the people of our country.  Obama and the Left are marginalizing GOP principles and the ability the party has to push for them.</p>
<p>Once they gain enough ground outside the electoral process, they will abandon any pretense to bi-partisanship for autocracy.  If Obama truly wanted bi-partisanship there are any number of others he could appoint to Commerce or offer the job.  Walter Williams comes to mind.  The reasons why WW wasn&#8217;t offered the job are immediately apparent.</p>
<p>This was a fork move against the GOP that was successful at only the lowest level now.  Who knows how it may play out eventually?  In any event, this will not be Obama&#8217;s only attempt at subversion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izoneguy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-r-nh-atop-list-for-commerce-secretary/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>izoneguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/blue_collar_muse/?p=62#comment-171</guid>
		<description>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-not-without-my-elephant/


Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) won’t accept a position as President Obama’s secretary of Commerce unless he is guaranteed his Senate seat remains in GOP hands, said two Republicans who know Gregg well.

Departing the Senate without one could give Democrats 60 members and a filibuster-proof majority.

“Gregg would never allow his seat to go to a Democrat, the only way he would allow it is if he died,” said a Republican close to Gregg. “He would consider it to be a breach of trust to people who elected it.” …

Republicans who know Gregg well say that Lynch must agree to select a Republican because Gregg, one of the most revered leaders in New Hampshire Republican politics, would not allow his seat to give Democrats filibuster-proof control of the Senate.

“He will not take Commerce secretary unless Lynch says he will appoint a Republican,” said the Republican close to Gregg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/01/judd-gregg-not-without-my-elephant/</p>
<p>Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) won’t accept a position as President Obama’s secretary of Commerce unless he is guaranteed his Senate seat remains in GOP hands, said two Republicans who know Gregg well.</p>
<p>Departing the Senate without one could give Democrats 60 members and a filibuster-proof majority.</p>
<p>“Gregg would never allow his seat to go to a Democrat, the only way he would allow it is if he died,” said a Republican close to Gregg. “He would consider it to be a breach of trust to people who elected it.” …</p>
<p>Republicans who know Gregg well say that Lynch must agree to select a Republican because Gregg, one of the most revered leaders in New Hampshire Republican politics, would not allow his seat to give Democrats filibuster-proof control of the Senate.</p>
<p>“He will not take Commerce secretary unless Lynch says he will appoint a Republican,” said the Republican close to Gregg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

