“Just Let Us Have This Moment”


When Did Americans Stop Being Racists?

I’ve been struggling mightily with this. Not only every talking head and newspaper writer in the whole world, but also large numbers of my acquaintances have entered a state of near-delirium over the result of last Tuesday’s election.

Many of them have been saying “Please, just let us have this moment.” This is startling because at some level, they’re acknowledging that the hope, joy and even (God help us) the tears that they’ve invested in what is merely the result of an exercise in transferring political power, are phony and will not last.

Puh-leeze, people! A Nobel-prize winning economist, Paul Krugman, literally wrote last week that there’s something wrong with any person who didn’t weep for joy at this election result.

Let’s take one of Krugman’s colleagues at the New York Times, racialist columnist Bob Herbert. Now Herbert is no one’s idea of a top-flight journalist. And it’s not original for him to have written last week that he was shedding tears of joy over the election, because now that we’ve finally elected a black man to run our government, we’ve proven ourselves worthy of his love.


And he knows that there is a lot of work to do ahead if conditions are to change for the better. Still, “let him have this moment.” It’s very, very difficult to escape the conclusion that what Herbert and many others are saying is: Yes, we know that the specific man we made President isn’t necessarily going to make a lot of things better. (Indeed, he set expectations at a very low level in his first press conference, which on its face presages a small-bore Presidency like Bill Clinton’s second term.)

But America finally elected a black man! Let’s enjoy this moment and shed tears of joy while we can!

It’s taken me days to understand why this bothers me so much. Then I recalled that, barely a week ago, the selfsame Bob Herbert was writing vitriolically about the racism of an America in which nearly half the people (according to the polling at the time) were even considering not voting for the black man.

And in this week’s column, he writes picturesquely about the fidelity that blacks placed in America, even as “the breeze put the stiffened bodies of lynched victims in motion.” Did Bob Herbert stop fearing last Tuesday night that he himself might someday be lynched?

It’s hard for me not to hear that Bob Herbert and many, many others have suddenly decided that America is no longer the irretrievably racist country that so enlivens their fantasies. Does he therefore believe that melanin-challenged people like myself, who were racists to him just before the election, suddenly had an unlikely personal transformation?

Or, more hopefully, does it mean that Herbert and others were wrong about America all along? Does he finally understand that this country really wasn’t as racist as we’ve all been led to believe? That it was wrong to speak of America as racist just before the election?

Do you see the problem with all this? Bob Herbert is one thing. He makes his living in part by telling white people that they’re bigots.

But all kinds of white people reacted the same way as he did, with childish tears of joy. Those people can only be saying one of two things:

Either they believe they themselves are racists, and they were suddenly redeemed by their vote for a black man. This is messianism of a high order. It’s very unsettling, and very creepy.

The other possibility is that they all believed hitherto that every white person in America is a racist except for themselves and their acquaintances. And they’re overjoyed that all the rest of us turned out not to be as racist as they’d all been led to believe.

Sorry. I’ve never been a racist. And I’ve never believed that all that many people in America really are animated by racism and ignorance. If nothing good comes out of this election, perhaps at least we can get past this slander born of the sins of past generations of people, none of whom is still alive today.

“Just let us have this moment.” Why? Because tomorrow you’ll all go back to thinking that half of this country still is ignorant and racist, and the fantasy of unity and tolerance will end?

Here’s a newsflash: America won’t have changed. Part of the reason it’s so hard to work together is because of fear, intolerance and ignorance on the part of people who assume prejudicially that other Americans are racists.

-Francis Cianfrocca


Category: , ,

RSS feed

36 Comments Leave a comment

America

SunDogII Monday, November 10th at 7:19AM EST (link)

stopped being a racist nation quite some time ago, although there are still racists among us.
There is, however, a problem with the racism in the African American community, and at some point, the African American community must address it.

Black Liberation Theology

BigGator5 (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 8:04AM EST (link)

Black Liberation Theology…

Look it up. In fact, I will do you one better. Watch this video…

I shake my head and wonder why we elected him.

Educated (About The Issues Facing Us Today), Dedicated (To Making A Difference), And Highly Motivated (To Getting Things Done)
@biggator5

 
 

Have to disagree with something.

Rottimer Monday, November 10th at 8:09AM EST (link)

perhaps at least we can get past this slander born of the sins of past generations of people, none of whom is still alive today.

While I agree with most of your post, I have to take issue with this line. There are plenty of people alive today that consciously lived through the 50′s and 60′s and thought differently than they do today. There are 60, 70 and 80 year olds that were part of the klan or thought separate but equal was the right way to go. What has happened is that these people have changed their minds and evolved passed color tainted political decisions.

Heck, Robert Byrd, a current democratic senator, used to be a klansman.

What I have to also admit, is that there are black people that are 60, 70 and 80 years old that lived through that time on the other side. If I was that age and of that generation, I imagine this would be a historic election for me. So I’ll let them have their “moment.” But on January 20th, Obama will be like every other president we’ve ever had and subject to criticism.

 

Very well said.

johnCV (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 8:14AM EST (link)

The people who elected obama believe America is a bad place.

The people who voted against obama believe that America is an exceptional place that is losing it’s way.

It’s really that simple. Race was only an issue to one side.

It’s getting tiresome that the only meme that is ever offered for discussion is from the perspective of leftists (e.g. race, the poor, feminism, abortion etc.) and how the right somehow is looking to ‘force’ it’s will on them.

 

I will not let them "have their moment" PLEASE!

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 8:23AM EST (link)

He is a hardcore left politician and the majority of the 57 million that voted for McCain did not do so out of racism…and to suggest otherwise is disgusting…..I will treat Obama just like the left has treated President Bush….and that is not good at all.

No respect from this Conservative voter!

 

A Churchillian Perspective on This

wolfgang Monday, November 10th at 8:29AM EST (link)

“It is good for a young man of twenty to be a Liberal, because it proves he has a heart.
It is equally bad for that same young man at fourty to not be a Conservative, because it proves he has no brain.”
Winston Churchill

 

When Obama fails...

izoneguy (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 8:33AM EST (link)

…there will be cries of racism. The left hangs on any shread of divisive behavior and when the going gets tough it will be because the other side did not help and we are racist. They cannot admit to any failure on their side. They never give the right credit for anything. I am not racist. My Dad is. And in his behavior I see what I don’t want to be. When the left gets up and beats it’s Tom Tom of racism, I see my father behavior being emulated.

The point cannot be made often enough: Modern liberalism, as embodied in the Obama presidency, is the defender of the status quo. And the status quo is a road to economic ruin. Political forces cannot redistribute the wealth that the economic system does not produce.

There will always be some who are racists.

Steph C (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 8:58AM EST (link)

It’s not something that will ever be completely eradicated because it happens within all races, all cultures. Picking one out as a scapegoat isn’t going to change that.

What we can change is our reaction to charges of such.

“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics

 
 

I think...

Pezman (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 9:10AM EST (link)

… people in America at a whole are good people who will help you if you’re in trouble or are in dire needs. Thats what makes this Country amazing. What people often don’t see is that there is still racism in this country from all races. Whitey is not the only people who still have a small group of racists.

I’ve had people tell me on other forums that people who are not white can not be racist, just bitter. I say thats malarkey because when you hate someone based on color thats racism. So is VOTING for someone based on color.

This issue makes it hard for me to post on other forums because as soon as I post a fact about something I disagree with Obama on, I get 20 people calling me a bigot and a racist. It makes it hard to have a conversation.

Courage is the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others ~ Winston Churchill

Did you steal this from me???

LizVBronx (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 9:14AM EST (link)

I totally agree with you 250%!!

This is EXACTLY how I feel. Thank you.

Actually

Davo (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 9:19AM EST (link)

It was Francois Guizot.(1787-1874) French historian and statesman under Louis Philippe.

Never Give In, Never, Never, Never

I am in your head LizVBronx :-).....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 9:30AM EST (link)

actually WE think alike because we don’t fall into that wussy category of “we are better than this”…It is not “beneath” me to get down in the gutter and battle with leftards….and while we are better than they are we are also older, wiser and MEANER than the little leftards could ever hope to be, THEY AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET :-)

I totally agree in regard to black people of a certain age

Francis Cianfrocca (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 10:04AM EST (link)

America’s historic sinfulness in regard to race is real and not to be denied. Black people of a certain age who lived through the tail-end of it, especially in certain parts of the country, are understandably wary of people who say (as I do) that racism is essentially a non-problem in America today.

But black people who came of age after the triumphs of the Civil Rights movement (which even I probably would have shed tears over, were I old enough to have seen them), have no standing to accuse today’s Americans of pervasive, “institutionalized” racism. The latter is something I utterly and implacably reject.

As the definition of racism is the belief that a race is inferior

phred (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 10:10AM EST (link)

it would be self-debasing for a race to declare it impossible for itself to be racist and if the person who said it was white, it would infer superiority of whites and therefore is a racist remark.

Obama’s victory has removed the perception of inequality of races from the table. For the most part Obama did not run a campaign based on his race. His lackluster credentials of community organizer, state legislator, and a partial Senate term do not present an overwhelming background of executive aptitude. Since he obviously did not require superhuman capabilities or experience to overcome his “blackness,” and that blackness was not a major campaign bullet, I think all of America can now enjoy a political and philosophical fight now without concern that their adversary is perceived handicapped.

Liberalism: Equally shared misery.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Obama will probably fail, miserably.

Tbone (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 10:12AM EST (link)

A lot of people will suffer. A lot of people will conclude he failed because he is black, not because he is inept and wrong on policy. I think, as such, we will see a new wave of racism sweep the Country.

Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.

As the definition of racism is the belief that a race is inferior,

phred (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 10:13AM EST (link)

it would be self-debasing for a race to declare it impossible for itself to be racist and if the person who said it was white, it would infer superiority of whites and therefore is a racist remark.

Obama’s victory has removed the perception of inequality of races from the table. For the most part Obama did not run a campaign based on his race. His lackluster credentials of community organizer, state legislator, and a partial Senate term do not present an overwhelming background of executive aptitude. Since he obviously did not require superhuman capabilities or experience to overcome his “blackness,” and that blackness was not a major campaign bullet, I think all of America can now enjoy a political and philosophical fight now without concern that their adversary is perceived handicapped.

Liberalism: Equally shared misery.

 
 

I shed no tears on election night,

ColoKid Monday, November 10th at 10:41AM EST (link)

either for Obama’s victory or for McCain’s defeat. Fine, I say, let Obama’s supporters have their moment of triumph and glory.

I would have loved to vote for a conservative black candidate for the office of the presidency. I would have loved to see the black community have an honest debate with itself about that candidate’s policies and positions rather than just having it rubber stamp another black liberal politician. But the absence of that debate in 2008 means that, far from this election being a vanquishing of racism, the race issue has just been kicked further down the road. Whites have shown that they will vote for a black candidate over a white one, but blacks have shown only that they will unite behind one of their own race.

So after the tears of joy have been shed, it’s back to the real world, and it’s not a pretty world right now. Obama will not have an easy time; nor would McCain have had. But when the inevitable severe and bitter criticsm of Obama’s policies and decisions arises, one-note observers like Bob Herbert will have but one response to the criticism: it’s just racism. And so the beat goes on. So much for the defining moment of American politics.

 

perfectly said

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 11:02AM EST (link)

I will not allow the left-guilt-racists their moment. We elected a small-time crook who will do considerable damage in his 4 years.

I was never a racist, and never will be. And it taxes my patience to its very end to have to endure 2-bit racist hacks like Bob Herbert, who make their living falsely accusing me of racism.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

 

The last thing the country needed

finaljeopardy Monday, November 10th at 11:41AM EST (link)

during the economic crisis and while we are in two wars, was a national dialogue on race relations. It is evidence of Obama’s sociopathic obliviousness to everything but his own ambitions. He had and still has no plans for helping Americans; he just wanted to be the First Black President like poor W wanted his father’s approval.

Those who voted for Obama were similarly irresponsible, selfish and cynical when they cast their ballots. John McCain ran a gutless campaign and bungled the financial crisis. The majority of people who voted for Obama saw the Republican party as standing for corporate welfare, and they wanted their handout, too. They voted to punish our government, but they are instead punishing the country itself.

The sacrifice of national security for proving racial equality seems a steep price tag, even when you throw in every tragedy from before the Civi War through to the Civil Rights Movement. It seemed petty and insulting to even ask it.

You are so correct to point out

phred (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 12:11PM EST (link)

that this country has not banked the extravagance of strength necessary to accommodate a touchy/feely experiment.

It is of no consequence to have bragging rights of our “righteousness” at a time of dire vulnerability. Our adversaries will not view our historic moment as anything other than a distraction to our task, and therefore a weakness.

Liberalism: Equally shared misery.

 
 

Affirmative action, at the Presidential Level

jonreagan (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 12:17PM EST (link)

Great diary, and many thoughtful comments. My own take was that for all the babble about “turning the page” on racism, Obama’s election is really just the opposite….we’re actually regressing.

Someone with a thin resume, no significant accomplishments, troubling associations (that would probably prevent him from getting a security clearance)…..that person is promoted from one job he’s not qualified for, into yet another job that he’s unqualifed for. And if you challenge his promotion, you’re branded as a racist, and someone who just doesn’t get it.

Yeah, it’s just affirmative action all over again, and there’s nothing “new” or “transcending” about it. If Krugman believes we should all be shedding tears, maybe he should know that many will shed tears because in reality, the country hasn’t gotten very far at all in this area. The highest office in the land is being used in some misguided “act of contrition” for those who believe it will put an unfortunate racial history behind us. Affirmative action never worked in practice and is actually counter-productive…..just a preview of the Obama presidency.

 

Yes they do and I answer them "No."

The_Gadfly (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 12:29PM EST (link)

That you voted for Obama because he is black and not because of the positions he advocates is already clear to me, and will steadily become clearer on the national scene as he progressively seizes the machinery of power. To me, that is as racist as any member of the Klan who will not pull the lever for a black man.

Moreover, you pulled the lever for a black man even though history is already replete with the failures of ideology he espouses: almost any country in old Europe will do these days, but the best example is the Soviet Union which most fully embraced and executed the ideology he espouses. You didn’t want to recognize his retort to Joe the Plumber as Socialism, and you denied the validity ot the radio tapes when he openly talked about redistributive policies from government not coming to fruition because activist focused too much on the courts and not enough on the elected offices from which they could enact those policies. You didn’t want to hear that before the election, now you will learn it to the detriment of all of us now that it is over.

Obama cannot heal the racial divide, because he himself depends on it. He reaches for the “racist” epithet whenever he is challenged on facts. He depended on racial animosity every time he reminded blacks that he “didn’t look like any of the people on dollar bills.”

Obama cannot even reach across the aisle within his own party to say “Leave Joe Lieberman alone! He disagrees with us on only one issue and supports us on all others. He cannot even carry that issue with the numbers we now have. There must be some room for civil discourse within our party and country.”

Obama has chosen as his chief of staff someone so vile as an enemy lister that even Richard Nixon would be embarrassed to have him on his staff. I can’t even quote him after the election on this site without Moe reaching for the blam stick.

You who have voted for Obama have sown to the wind, and now we ALL will reap the whirlwind.

 

Another black man could have ran for President in 2000, and won

phxg (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 12:38PM EST (link)

Colin Powell.

The ascension of Obama is not about voting for a “black man”, but to be wrapped in the nurturing blanket of “care”, discarding personal responsibility for the opportunity to be a young child again.

I’ve said all along, just not this black man.

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle

yes

LizVBronx (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 1:31PM EST (link)

we will continue to fight!! Judging by your screen name you must be as disgusted as I am.

oh yeah I am....

JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 1:53PM EST (link)

but I always see the glass half full and will not let this twit winning the WH change that :-)

 
 
 

The Left is racist, sexist, anti-gay, etc., etc

bobbymike (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 2:16PM EST (link)

I will say this without reservation and as the absolute truth and I believe the VAST majority of the 57 million McCain voters thought the same way.

“I saw Obama as a far left, tax raising politician that would be bad for national security and did not respect the Constitution….PERIOD”

Conservatives DO NOT CARE if you are a women, man, black, brown or mauve with orange spots. IT IS THE POLICY STUPID.

I would not support a far left politician if he was a wheelchair bound half black/half hispanic transgendered “person”

Mark Levin said it best “where was the white liberal support of Michael Steele or Lynn Swann….in fact the left tried to destroy them. Remember Clarence Thomas?? Did the left weep at his appointment.

When a conservative black runs they say “only policy counts” When a liberal black runs and conservatives say the same thing we are really closet racists!!

I WILL SAY THIS AGAIN AND AGAIN TO ANY AND ALL CONSERVATIVES WHO READ THIS/MY POSTS.

THE LEFT HATES US AND WANTS US DEFEATED, ACT ACCORDINGLY

 

Executive leadership and administrative knowledge

Western Monday, November 10th at 4:21PM EST (link)

To reitrate Rudy Guilian’s speech at the RNC, President-elect Obama is the most inexperienced politican/statesman to hold the Presidency since Warren Harding in 1920.

  1. Herbert Hoover–U.S. Commerce Secretary for seven years. Administrative experience.

  2. Franklin Roosevelt–Assistant Secretary of Navy in 1913, Vice Presidential candidate in 1920, and Governor of New York. Executive and administrative experience.

  3. Harry Truman–U.S. Senator for six years and a Vice President. Executive experience.

  4. Dwight Eisenhower–Leadership and diplomacy skills with his numerous military appointments in WWII and Supreme Commander of NATO in 1950. He mastered administrative skills during those years as a military commander.

  5. John Kennedy–3-term U.S. House Representative and a 2-term U.S. Senator.

  6. Lyndon Johnson–6-term U.S. House Representative; 2-term U.S. Senator and Vice President for 3 years. Possessed limited executive experience.

  7. Richard Nixon–1-term U.S. House Representative, U.S. Senator for 2 years and Vice President for 8 years. Possessed executive experience and limited adminstrative experience.

  8. Gerald Fold–not an elected President.

  9. Jimmy Carter–Governor for 4 years. Had executive experience.

  10. Ronald Reagan–2-term governor. Possessed executive experience.

  11. George H. Bush–2-term U.S. House representative; Administrative experience as RNC chairman, head of CIA; ambassador to United Nations and executive experience as Vice President for eight years.

  12. Bill Clinton–Governor of Arkanas for 12 years. Executive experience.

  13. George W. Bush–2-term governor. Executive experience.

My Point:

Executive experience, expecially as a Governor, is crucial in delegating authority and mastering the art of compromise.

Overall, GOVERNORS are better suited to deal with executive decisions than legislators.

At least John Kennedy, the most inexperienced president in terms of executive experience in the last 80 years, had more years (14 years) in the U.S. Congress than Obama (about 18 MONTHS).

Executive experience and administrative skill are crucial in executing the laws.

From this point forward, Obama cannot hide behind campaign slogans and bashing George W. Bush.

Executive decisions occur daily and the consequences are real.

Republican governors can still have an impact in the future for the party:

Jindal in Louisana;
Palin in Alaska; and
Crist in Florida

Obama may turn out to be a extraordinary executive–OR he may succumb to the same indecisive traits of a weak executive.

Time will tell.

Its too bad

baserunr (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 5:08PM EST (link)

that this is now all about the color of his skin, and not the content of his character. Why should it make any difference if the next President is black, white, blue, or green? It only matters to me that the individual is qualified, capable, and trustworthy. The left can celebrate their precious “diversity” all they want, but there is work to be done. It won’t be long before the adults are back in charge. The real adults, not the compassionate conservative ones.

“The day you think you know it all is the day your trouble starts.”

totally agree, baserunr

E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 6:51PM EST (link)

There comes a time when the work has to be done, when decisions with grave consequences have to be made.

Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO

I simply disagree with the affirmative action bit

Rottimer Monday, November 10th at 8:13PM EST (link)

Every single U.S. citizen has the right to run for president. The constitution doesn’t make any requirements beyond those of age and citizenship. If the majority of voters vote for a liberal democrat or a republican plumber, it’s what they wanted and what they’re going to get. There’s no affirmative action involved. He didn’t get any handout votes (that we know of).

I blame a meandering and off-message McCain campaign for the loss. But I won’t call the winner an affirmative action candidate. Instead, I think we should learn from his internet fund raising and grassroots methods. They obviously worked.

Isn't this affermative action?

JoeG Monday, November 10th at 8:58PM EST (link)

We just elected a black man who’s unqualified for the job. Ask yourself honestly, if he was white with the same resume’, would he have been elected?

If he fails, a lot of people will realize this, and I share your fear.

What would have been far better would be for a black conservative to be elected to the presidency.

It is though

JoeG Monday, November 10th at 9:03PM EST (link)

Would Obama have won the primary if he was white? No way.

Blacks make up a huge chunk of the Democrat’s primary. Without them voting in overwhelming margins for Obama, Hillary would have been the nominee. He is president because of his race.

That’s not to say that no black man can be president without affirmative action… just this one can’t be.

That was the primary

Rottimer Monday, November 10th at 9:29PM EST (link)

I can see your point about the primary. Blacks make up a significant portion of the dem party. But that doesn’t apply to the general. In recent history, blacks have always supported the dem candidate in overwhelming numbers. They supported Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Dukakis all at a rate of nearly 9 to 1. So that was no excuse for the poor campaign McCain ran.

Compare the scrutiny of Obama with that of Gov. Palin

jonreagan (Diary) Monday, November 10th at 10:22PM EST (link)

For openers, just compare the outcry from the media and others over whether Gov. Palin was “experienced enough” or qualified to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Did you EVER hear them direct the same concerns toward Senator Obama? Consider that,

1) Obama was a freshman Senator, Sarah Palin a first-term Governor.
2) Palin could point to a litany of specific accomplishments, e.g., negotiating a 1700 mile nat gas pipeline, worked out with the heads of major energy companies. By contrast, Obama never co-sponsored a major piece of legislation–either as an Illinois Senator, or in the US Senate. Just voted “present” a lot, I guess.
3) While we’re at it, Obama was in the #1 spot on the Dems’ ticket, Palin in the #2 spot for our side. Even if you assume that both are rookies, wouldn’t the media focus the majority of attention on the Presidential nominee if he lacked a real background?

But the media assault continued unabated….and I talked to lots of wishy-washy voters who used the Palin choice as the reason “they just couldn’t vote for McCain”. This also came from the likes of Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, et al.

So when Barack Obama gets a pass on the kind of scrutiny other candidates for the Presidency are normally subjected to, yes, my friend….that is the 2008 version of affirmative action. Applied to the highest office in the land.

But if he didn't win the primary

JoeG Tuesday, November 11th at 12:21AM EST (link)

he wouldn’t be president.

That’s count #1.

Now for count #2.

Blacks went from voting 90% dem to 97% dem. They also doubled their turnout. That made a difference in many states. It may have been the key in VA, NC & FL.

The second part is how many swing voters did personal affirmative action? I know several. I don’t have an accurate gauge, but I suspect that it’s a fair number.

Was it only race in the general? No. Was it still a large part of it? Yes…

Agreed; NOW is really "Nat'l Org for LIBERAL Women"

jonreagan (Diary) Tuesday, November 11th at 12:44AM EST (link)

Liberals assume that minority groups are monoliths….large herds of sheep that act, behave, and vote in the same way. It’s an incredibly condescending view of people…but if you stray off their plantation you are demonized…witness the treatment of Sarah Palin and Clarence Thomas.

And I’m glad you mentioned gays as well; in my city, Log Cabin Republicans have been branded (by ex-friends, I assure you) as “self-loathing” and “pathetic”. So much for liberals’ tiresome claims of loving everyone, and of being protectors of minorities. What a crock…