Beyond any doubt, Sarah Palin is the most remarkable media phenomenon of the year, and perhaps of several years.
Last week, she was “Sarah Who?” This week, she and her baby will be on the cover of a Hollywood celebrity-dish rag, as if she were Britney Spears or Paris Hilton.
Completely lost in the volcanic paroxysm of mass-media anger, incredulity and blatant sexism are the plain facts that Sarah Palin is: A) a highly-accomplished woman; B) the successful Governor of an important state; C) a proven reformer with nerves of steel; D) more qualified by executive experience than either Barack Obama or Joe Biden; E) has inspired the love and admiration of half the people in this country; and F) is an entirely credible candidate for the Vice-Presidency of the United States.
So why on earth have all the mainstream media descended on Sarah Palin like a ton of bricks? Why are they so threatened by the Governor of Alaska?
I’m not so convinced that the big-time press are trying to smear Palin out of partisan animus. I don’t believe that mainstream journalists actually have partisan animus. In their own minds, they really are fair, objective, balanced, disinterested observers. It simply never occurs to them that it’s possible for normal, reasonable people to have different political biases than they do.
Here’s the real reason the mainstream press are treating Sarah Palin like Public Enemy Number One:
BECAUSE SHE DOESN’T OWE THEM ANYTHING.
Name a single other politician on the national scene who has achieved any kind of success without first going through innumerable appearances on Meet the Press and its siblings. Media people literally think they’re an essential part of the ruling class, a coeval branch of government.
When someone comes along and achieves importance outside of their power structure, the threat to them is immediate and visceral. More than anything else, they’re protective of the fundamental power they have, which is to shape the debate.
Sarah Palin has stirred up the media’s insular little world like very little else ever has, by threatening that world in the way that matters to it most of all.
The effect would have been no different if she had taken a baseball bat, and blasted every single news person in this blessed country in the head with it, from the top execs, through the on-air talent, right down to the stringers.
-Francis Cianfrocca
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Lead Story on CNN.com
Grim (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:08AM EST (link)The current lead story on CNN.com is about Bristol Palin and teen pregnancy(10 AM Eastern). Isn’t there any real news to report?
If my memory serves me correctly, didn’t CNN.com have a wide banner along the top heralding the Democratic Convention? Does anyone have an archive?
Grim
Man!
The_Fastest_Squirrel (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:09AM EST (link)I’m going to have to tune out for a couple of days. The attacks on Palin are seriously raising my blood pressure. I sent $200 today (Thursday is the last day for contributions). Now, for the sake of health, I have to take a break.
Blackhedd… you are awesome.
You got it.
Paul Seale (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:17AM EST (link)BECAUSE SHE DOESN’T OWE THEM ANYTHING
This is very true. I am also convinced it is why Fred Thompson got a lot of bad press and lies spread about him during the later stages of his campaign.
He didnt kiss the right rings.
The exact same thing is true with Palin. She hasnt kissed the right rings and is paying the price for it.
Blackhedd, SO TRUE.
Rod_Patrick (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:21AM EST (link)And I hope that it stays that way.
Anything about MSM is bad politicking. Even Pres. Bush has had enough of MSM and doesnt’ want to communicate with them…because it’s so simple:
MSM is the biggest LIAR in America.
In most interviews, If you say Yes, MSM will report NO with a scorn.
Hmmm
guyatherton Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:32AM EST (link)Yes she does have more executive experience than John McCain – well said!
I wouldn
t say she has the love of half the country. She has the love of the social conservative base - maybe 25-30% of the population.t the bee all and end all of importance. We are all equal before God.Alaska is no more important than many other states (red and blue). Yes it has oil but then so do many other states and oil isn
Proven reformer? Yes she took on Ted Stevens after setting up a 527 for him and she has been for earmarks before being against them and yes she hired lobbyists in her small town.
Remember the more press on her the less time and attention for attacks on Obama. She is also eclipising McCain and will have her own power base independent of him. May not help with governing.
Good post
Neil Stevens (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:32AM EST (link)She’s the anti-Obama. She made it without their hype, TRULY just using grass roots support.
RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules
Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.
“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder
This is the Death Rattle of
PaRep (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:36AM EST (link)The Drive By Media
guyatherton, we don't need to attack Obama all the time.
Tim_Schieferecke (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 9:43AM EST (link)He does an excellent job of keel hulling himself. He is a leftist fantasy in a nation that isn’t leftist. Sarah Palin is exactly what he needs. She has the energy to light his campaign with a rocket engine, and get this… do it POSITIVELY by speaking to clear differences on THE ISSUES. McCain/Palin will be a juggernaut, and Sarah Palin will be the first female POTUS when President McCain’s term is finished. You can make book on that.
Tim Schieferecke
Agreed, but
mikefisk (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 10:08AM EST (link)I would put the main comparison point to this on not Fred Thompson, but Clarence Thomas, and for largely the same reasons. The modern progressive movement thinks that women, minorities, and the poor are in need of special favors and consideration in order to get anywhere in a cold, bigoted America, yet Thomas and Palin have both proven that talent, insight, and a take-no-prisoners attitude work just fine as well, regardless of one’s circumstances.
…Therefore, they both have to be vilified, demonized, and ultimately brought down in order to save the artifice of the Fatal Conceit of the left.
“Once within the maw of Leviathan, degree of digestion is irrelevant.” – Michael Fisk
9.25, -4.77
Way, way off the mark.
Catsy Wednesday, September 3rd at 10:31AM EST (link)I’m sorry, but I don’t think this could be much further from the truth. While obviously we are both generalizing about a large and diverse group, as a herd the media are generally fixated on one thing: creating and sustaining a dramatic narrative that sells.
This is the driving force behind the majority of their obsession with Obama, for better or for worse: whether they’re crucifying him or deifying him, they’re piling on what is indisputably a dramatic, historic narrative that practically sells itself.
With Gov. Palin they simply smell opportunity. With most VP picks, you’re going to go with a known quantity, someone who’s been extensively vetted and with a mountain of preexisting talking points and research. When you catapult someone who is a relative unknown into that role, suddenly you have an entire industry with the opportunity to make or break their career by breaking the Big Scoop. You can bet every political beat reporter in the country is harassing every minor functionary in Podunk, AK for any tidbit that might be relevant or make an interesting story.
Obviously, there’s a ton of people in AK with axes to grind against Gov. Palin. So they’re going to talk, and some of them are going to say things that make it to print. Some of those things are going to be true, some colored by bias, and some outright fabrication. And unfortunately for her, some of those stories are pretty good at putting butts in seats during prime time.
The pregnancy story is simply icing at this point. By this time, none of us should be the least bit surprised that sex sells, and that if there are two news stories–one with a prurient angle, and one without–the media will hammer the prurient one relentlessly because it’s the one that sells.
That’s the majority of what’s happening here. It’s not a butthurt on the media’s party, and it’s not ideological. It has nothing to do with what’s decent or fair. It’s just laziness and avarice.
That’s all that’s happening here.
Is it now safe to say
johnt Wednesday, September 3rd at 10:33AM EST (link)that Chelsea Clinton is ugly. Remarkable how things change, how family members have become a campaign issue, how liberals dump beliefs in the can.
The media, the only thing that makes the Democratic party viable, may realize their mistakes quite soon, maybe by the end of the week.
Then again there’s a class of moron that never learns.
“a man’s admiration for absolute government is proportinate to the contempt he feels for those around him”. Tocqueville
Dead on Blackhedd
Darin_H (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 10:45AM EST (link)She also didn’t bow low before them after McCain selected her.
A visionary coward says that anger can be power, as long as there’s a victim on TV – Flat Top, Goo Goo Dolls
Disagree Catsy
Matthew Morris (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:06AM EST (link)I think what you are saying is true. Sensationalism sells, and the media tends towards dramatic narratives. But this is only part of the truth.
I think Blackhedd’s take is part of the truth as well.
But I think there is a third truth that you both neglect or reject. Institutional bias. These guys, both collectively and individually, are infected with a strong bias, as a function of the types of people that are into that line of work, the way they are brought up and trained, and the way they see the world. It is as simple as this: When someone like me may see the glass as half full, if the majority of those in the media see it as half empty- and tell the half empty story in countless ways and formats- well, that is going to have an impact. And it does.
Let me reiterate the third point. Bias, and not even necessarily animosity, can in the end result in a wholly different interpretation of the news being delivered to and received by the masses- all the while the facts don’t necessary have to be untrue or inaccurate.
Now, when they start repeating rumors and lies in the guise of news, like “liberal blogs are in a flurry of activity tonight over reports that Trig belongs to Bristol, not Sarah, Palin.”… Well I am still having a hard time connecting the dots with the way the media has attacked Sarah Palin by way of her minor daughter.
I don’t think being displeased that she has not paid her media dues, sensationalism, bias, and enmity can explain it this time.
“I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”
Ipsum esse subsistens
oops
Matthew Morris (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:13AM EST (link)I apologize for not fulfilling my REPLY TO THIS duties. This was in response to Catsy, 3-4 root comments up.
“I AM WHO I AM”; and He said, “Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”
Ipsum esse subsistens
Bias
Catsy Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:25AM EST (link)The problem I have with the bias argument, regardless of who advances it ideologically, is that it just doesn’t fit as a Grand Unified Theory for the media herd mentality.
There are individuals, and, to an extent, organizations which allow their bias to color their reporting. CBS and MSNBC obviously have left-leaning individuals in a position to influence programming. Fox News is nakedly partisan, as is Keith Olbermann or Brit Hume. These leanings can explain individual instances of bias. But it simply defies reason to allege that an industry composed of individuals with such a broad range of ideologies is driving an attack on Sarah Palin because of bias.
To believe this requires that we ignore every counterexample, such as the way the media as a whole obsessed over Rev. Wright or Obama’s “fist bump”, or how even Fox News has been all over the Palin stories.
News is a business. Business has a bottom line. It’s really the only explanation that fits all the examples, instead of just the ones that annoy us.
Nailed it! 5*5*5
phxg (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:38AM EST (link)I would add one point on the “She doesn’t owe them” idea.
Since the media is down for Obama and they are masters at the manipulation of the general public; they see the potential of Sarah Palin not the Governor but the woman to disrupt their carefully manicured presentation of The Obamessiah.
It is in this mindset that every writer within the MSM is fearful of the bright light that shines from Palin. I know how I feel, absolutely giddy now over her nomination. Many of the people I know (admittedly conservatives) are energized for McCain; and these are folks who despise McCain.
The last time I felt like this was in 1980 and many echo the same feelings as I. And this is why the MSM is pulling out all the stops to discredit Palin. But I believe it will backfire.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle
Surely you jest, nt
Kate_Shanahan (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:41AM EST (link)nt
Kate
“It is the American vice, the democratic disease which expresses its tyranny by reducing everything unique to the level of the herd.” Henry Miller
Reagan showed how to beat the press
Vinnster Wednesday, September 3rd at 11:58AM EST (link)If you folks think back (and are that old) Reagan is the one who beat the press by going around and over them. Just as has been noted, before Reagan and since to get anywhere you had to kiss the the MSM ring and be subjected to their scrutiny and not challenge them.
I remember when Reagan’s message was not getting past the MSM filter so he started prime time “Addresses from the Oval Office to the Nation” the MSM had to cover them and he told the nation his message himself…the MSM was apoplectic. He skunked them from that point forward. Bush 1 tried it and you may remember the MSM finally refused to cover them and they stopped.
I see a lot of Reagan in Palin…only time will tell, but for the first time in a decade I see the tiniest sparkle of hope we may have a new leader…a real leader.
Most of all she doesn't owe the feminazis anything...
allamerican Wednesday, September 3rd at 12:08PM EST (link)She is a hippy’s nightmare come to life. Here come a woman who has done the hard work to get where she is without having done any partisan bs to obfuscate her right to claim the VP nomination. And she is beautiful, which only angers the hairy hippies more- ya’ll know its true. She has more “straight talk” and back that talk up with real reformer action than any person in the race. The media really doesn’t know what to do with her, so they go for the ratings ( and boardroom high-fives)and attack her. She will win America over tonight with her speech and then these bs attacks will ring hollow. By next week BO will be stealing pages from her play book mark my words!
I was born in '76 so I didn't know Reagan much.
Mord (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 12:43PM EST (link)I do remember, though, that when I grew up, I thought Reagan was a horrible president (I had no idea) because that was all I ever heard on the news. I remember “trickle down economics” whatever that was, it was bad I guess. I know now that Reagan was outstanding and that my opinion of him was wrong. It was wrong because the media hated him, just like they hate Bush and I trusted what they told me. I have always told my friends that Bush will be vindicated and remembered as an above average President at the very least! I never really believe what gets reported anymore when it comes to politics.
————————————–
“Republicans never win polls, they win elections,” – Rudy Giuliani
————————————–
Uh sometimes
Maggie_in_Indiana (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 1:04PM EST (link)they just like to torpedo the right when a possibility arises and omit the torpedos on the left when discovered by the right!Duh
Maggie in Indiana
Oh, you're so right blackhedd. OTOH, the Kos Kids are concerned about their manly powers.
streetwise (Diary) Wednesday, September 3rd at 1:06PM EST (link)They think that talking trash online and lobbing F-bombs are the height of guy cool.
Now comes this Second Amendment Sister who can not only shoot straight, but probably beat them up, too. Not to mention her husband!
Of course, Sarah intimidates me, too. But I gave up concern about macho stuff a while back as I progressed into middle age. My priority has shifted to breathing. So Ms. Palin doesn’t bother me!