There is only one way I can explain the degeneracy of the liberal mind – inbreeding.

translates into murdering infants in utero. As the advances in general and medical technology are so rapid, it is becoming easier and easier for any layperson to see the incredible life of the living child inside the womb. Think – coming to a TV monitor near you.

The Leftist Liberal and this double standard of keeping sociopaths from being put to death vs their efforts to destroy innocent humanity, is beyond hypocrisy. It is pure evil itself.

…is another area of double standard. The Left would rather leave us defenseless in the face of our enemies than risk a single military casualty but mass genocide of prenatal humans is just fine.

The logical disconnect is couched in a strong self-deception. Frankly, both the double standard I’ve mentioned and the one mentioned in the article makes them look foolish and disingenuous when examined rationally. However, the lack of rational and critical thought seems to be a prerequisite for “Progressives”.

Most importantly, it has cost the lives of babies who have been sacrificed on the Altar of The Left by those of all backgrounds.

/snark off.

I feel very comfortable saying that there is no medical reason for having an abortion past 24 weeks gestational age. I don’t care what you hear in response to this; the baby can be delivered via Cesarean section and given up for adoption, or the woman can wait to have the baby, but this “control of my body thing” trumps all and it doesn’t matter if the baby could be delivered by c-section, they want it dead so they don’t have to go through the whole thing of answering for their decisions.

They believe that any criminal can be reformed. It’s just a matter of trying. They’ll make claims that we’re not “nuanced” enough to understand the circumstances which led to the perpetrator committing the crime. It’s all about context to them.

Everything liberals believe is based on the idea that personal responsibility is an artifact which leads to inequality which is therefore to be crushed by the state.

The same is true for abortion. It’s not a matter of whether a fetus is alive. It’s a matter of whether the responsible party for it’s existence should be held accountable for that existence.

In both cases – abortion and the death penalty – the one responsible should not be held accountable.

My experience shows that the “Liberal” takes the stance that most strongly protects their existence.

If you protect a criminal from the death penalty, then you gain votes from criminals, their sympathizers , families and gangs.

If you side with abortion, you gain votes from others who need or want abortions, their families, friends and others in their click that are looking for more “Social Engineering Handouts”.

If you protect a fetus, you gain nothing. It will not remember that you took a stand.

It is all about retaining their coveted political position.
NOT what is right or wrong (morally or ethically)

This whole debate shows that the liberals feel they have to answer to no one because who is really calling them out on their hypocrisy? There will come a time when each will have to answer for their views and what they have accomplished. If the degenerates want to kill their babies and glorify murderers then so be it, but as for me and my house I will take an eye for and eye and stand up for the unborn. That decision is between me and my maker alone. I will love the liberal and hope they see the error of their ways, that is what I am commanded to do. Separate myself from the world and they will know me by my love.

We cannot force the debased to change their ways with speeches and protests because that is not what we are called to do. We are to kill them with kindness and love. The liberal in this world knows what they are doing is wrong deep down inside, but they are so hardened by what they think you need to break that barrier with love and show them a better way. I the mean time love one another and be there.

…curious that the party that deems itself the protector of minorities advances the notion the the only truly innocent minority, of which we were all once apart, that has no voice of its own should be slaughtered at wholesale.

That they should be executed merely for the “crime” of existing and offending the one who should be protecting them at all costs.

What is the possibility of labeling the unborn as a protected minority? Hmmm, maybe republicans should start using this verbiage to describe them instead of using “the unborn”. “Republicans: The party that protects the innocent minority”

of abortion loving liberal politicians by saying “If you are really Pro-Life you have to be against war and the death penalty too.” So, they justify voting for a pro-abortion liberal by saying that conservative Republicans are just as bad. However, for a Christian, there is no Biblical support for this view. The government’s role in protecting it’s citizens from enemies without and criminals within is supported by Biblical teaching. Jesus’ injunction to ‘turn the other cheek’ is being misused by liberals when applied to the role of government. Liberals have been effective in wooing away many ‘social gospel’ leaning Christians by this line of argument.

“There should be zero consideration of any suffering for babies in the womb”

We seem to be forgetting their desire to see babies who survive abortions suffer while they wait to die, unattended, on hospital storage shelves. You know, the practice Obama supported when he voted against a law banning the practice in Illinois.
There’s also the little bit of suffering a baby endures during a partial birth abortion.

No matter what intellualism they try to applique over it, the root of the advocacy for unrestricted abortion “rights” is the desire to be able to have irresponsible and unprotected sex without consequences. This desire exists in adults who either take risks or have an “accident,” something I don’t much believe in, and it exists in parents who want their child to be able to escape the consequences of irresponsible and unprotected sex.

Having raised a teenage daughter as a single father, I have some sympathy for the second one. I have no doubt that back then if she’d become pregnant while still dependent on me, I’d have had her on the next plane to Seattle for an abortion. I’m not so certain of that now and thankfully I never had to confront it with my stepdaughter either. I think now I would do what I could to make the daughter have the child and then put it up for adoption, though I’ve known two women who did put “unwanted” and “unplanned” babies up for adoption and had serious issues with their decision in later life. I was working with one of them when the baby that she’d given up, now college-aged found her and called her. They were able to establish a good if awkward relationship but both were pretty freaked by it.

As to adults who have “unplanned” and “unwanted” pregnancy, I have no sympathy. If you have sex, you’d damned well make certain that there are adequate protections in place or you’re PLANNING to have a baby. There is no “good time;” Vatican Roulette is the reason Catholics have such large families! With child support laws as they are in most states any man who has sex with a woman without being absolutely certain the HE has taken necessary precautions is just plain nuts or is just blithely assuming that if there is an “accident” she’ll just “take care of it” and the most consequence he’ll have to endure is paying some or all of the cost of the abortion. Unfortunately, with young women, that blithe assumption is probably correct.

and require that rapists be executed if their victim chooses to abort the “rape” baby.

If babies are killed as a result of abortion, then rapists should get it, too.

Nice little deterrence to enforce self-control.

Can’t take credit for this idea — this came from the hubby.

God bless the children.

in this area revolves around the whole “torture” debate. Liberals wring their hands over discomfort that terrorists undergo in waterboarding, which was carefully monitored and intended to prevent the deaths of thousands of innocent people, while they are indifferent to the pain that an unborn child experiences in the exercise of “reproductive choice.”

Consider also liberals’ double-standard in the whole Terri Schiavo affair, which we have just celebrated the fifth anniversary of. They feel great compassion for the suffering of a convicted murderer while they scoffed at the notion that Terri Shciavo was suffering for days on end after her feeding and hydration tubes were removed. They actually floated the argument that she was experiencing “ecstasy” during this ordeal.

Normal people can tell the difference, unbalanced loons desperate for a gotcha can not. The convicted killer has committed the most heinous crime, the baby has yet to be born, a liberal[?] can’t tell the difference? But the liberal thinks himself oh so clever.

It fits coming from the same creatures who have so much empathy for islamist terrorists. Terrorists, convicted murderers, well I guess they have to place their so called morals somewhere.
Truly sick human beings.

When the people of this country begin to believe in and legislate evil, it becomes only a matter of time until God invokes judgement on this nation. Judgement can occur cataclysmically or incrementally. But it will come rest assured. This issue among others has taken us down the same path as past fallen civilzations.

or they wouldn’t encourage abortion, rant and rave about “adult” access to pornography (which often includes depictions of children if not ACTUAL children), keep ruining the pub. school system and condemning the children trapped in it from learning anything, and keep from bearing any themselves—that last to our favor, as conservatives have more children than commies.

They love criminals because they function from a criminal mindset. Look at what they did to pass Obamanationcare: bribery, blackmail, secret deals, special dispensation (little o’s EO), and egregious lying, much of which could get you behind bars in any org. except Cong.

In fact, the left hates people altogether. Zeke Emanuel has advised all the cuts in Medicare and attention to the aged as they are not “worth” the investment. Just drop dead, granny, is exactly what Obamanationcare says.

Then there are the enviros who envision an earth without humanity. Except themselves, of course.

Bork’em. Don’t stop calling Cong. It is always planning to bork you. 202-224/225-3121.

Since 1600, the beginning of the primary colonial era in what became the USA, do you know how many criminals have been executed? About 20-22 thousand. I’m sure a handful of them may have even been innocent, and in the early days, some committed relatively minor crimes (not murder).

Since 1973 (just 37 years ago, less than 10% of the time frame mentioned above), there have been around 500,000 abortions in the USA. How many of them were innocent? I’m guessing all of them. And a disproportionate percentage were black.

This illustrates why any argument emphasizing life over equal protection of the laws is illogical and flawed.

Find an unborn child who brutally and intentionally killed someone else, and there should not be an inconsistency. I’m sure everyone here would be in agreement under that scenario.

In the twisted logic of the liberal, criminals are not responsible for their actions, because their life experiences, which are beyond their control, have inexorably led them to a situation in which a murderous act is inevitable. Similarly, they believe that women who becomes pregnant against her current wishes is not responsible, because her life experiences have led her inevitably to this circumstance.
We are all meat puppets, controlled by the hand of a mysterious and sometimes malevolent force. Those of us who are healthy, happy, and reasonably prosperous are just the lucky winners in a great cosmic lottery.

the other liberal double-standard when it comes to abortion: science.

Liberals will rail forever at conservatives for “not believing in science” when a conservative dares to question the “consensus” on global warming/climate change. But those same science-loving liberals will not for a second lend credence to real scientific evidence that proves conclusively that an unborn baby 1) is alive, 2) feels pain and 3) is not in any way a part of the mother’s body — all standards that would, in a sane, reasonable and just society, lead to the conclusion that an unborn baby is a separate living person and is thus entitled to equal protection under the law.

Please see: http://www.blackgenocide.org/

Margaret Sanger formed PP and the foundational precept was to keep the birthrate down for the “undesirables.” http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

But that same woman could choose to murder her unborn legally?

How does the left explain that?

shows their extremism in support of the double standard. They are only pro-choice when the “choice” being made is to have an abortion. They don’t want you to be able to choose a revolver over a semi-automatic, a Toyota over a Chevrolet, Blue Cross/Blue Shield over Group Health or even Bleu Cheese over Ranch. They are “Pro-Choice” only if “choice” means “do what we tell you”.

For those of you who are too young to remember I will clue you in: IT SUCKED!

We had a revolving door, we had criminals killing people they robbed because the penalties for robbery and for murder were about the same.

We had a feeling among the populace that there was no justice to be had and thus the rise of vigilante sentiments. Witness the popularity of movies like “Death Wish” and it’s many copycats.

And eventually we had the return of the death penalty in most of the nation and also mandatory minimum sentencing. Which I can best describe as; A bad idea who’s time has come. Not a good thing, but a necessary thing.

So, I don’t see any big push against the death penalty succeeding until a few more generations have passed (people always have to make their own mistakes it seems)

The very fact the concern is whether the baby feels pain while we kill it indicates how low we have sunk as a species.

Forget about religion for a moment and look at science. The argument that it’s the woman’s body and she has the right to kill the fetus can be scientifically disproved. The fetus is most certainly not part of the woman’s body. The fetus has its own, unique, genetic code and does not match the code of any organ in the woman’s body. The fetus may not even share her blood-type. The fetus is not just another organ to be dealt with as she desires. It is a unique individual that is killed during every abortion.