Attention, Democrats: your mortal enemy has reared his head. Joe the Plumber, AKA Samuel Wurzelbacher, is baaaaaaaack.
Back in 2008, Barack Obama for America fundraiser Helen Jones-Kelley—who was apparently also moonlighting as the director of the Ohio Jobs & Family Services—ordered a full investigation of Wurzelbacher in order to find any kind of dirt that Democrats could use to discredit him.
Desperate to curry favor with her masters at the Barack Obama campaign, Jones-Kelley ordered a full background check on Wulzerbacher, a move that was soon ruled to be illegal by the Ohio Inspector General.
Governor Ted Strickland refused calls to fire Jones-Kelley , who was also later found to be breaking Ohio laws by conducting political business during state-owned computers. In fact, the Strickland Administration still refuses to admit that Jones-Kelley acted improperly in any way, to this day. Jones-Kelley finally resigned in December of 2009.
Two of Jones-Kelley’s lackies, ODJFS Assistant Director Fred L. Williams and ODJFS Director of Child Support Doug Thompson were also involved in the witch-hunt; Thompson was fired in December 2008, and Williams resigned in January 2009.
Fast-forward to today. Wulzerbacher is suing Helen Jones-Kelley, Thompson and Williams, alleging that his confidential information was accessed improperly, as a form of retaliation for criticizing Jones-Kelley’s object of worship. Current Ohio Attorney General Dick Cordray is defending them in federal court. On your dime.
Yes. You are paying Dick Cordray to defend the invasion of your personal privacy . Say something that faceless bureaucrats don’t like? You can get your personal records illegally searched , and Ted Strickland and his cast of clowns won’t bat an eye.
You may be asking why Attorney General Cordray is defending former state employees. Ohio law states that the attorney general “shall represent and defend the officer or employee in any civil action instituted against the officer or employee," unless he or she determines that the employees "was acting manifestly outside the scope of his employment or official responsibilities, with malicious purpose, in bad faith , or in a wanton or reckless manner, the attorney general shall not represent and defend the officer or employee." (Ohio Revised Code, 109.361-109.365) My emphasis added.
Therefore we can infer that it is the official position of Dick that Jones-Kelley, et. al. did absolutely nothing wrong, and were in fact performing their jobs as servants of the public when they investigated the ObaMaster’s political enemies
That’s right. It is the opinion of the state’s top lawyer—the guy who represents the State of Ohio in court—that the government has every right to search your background if it doesn’t like what you say. And he’s going to spend your hard-earned tax money to fight to keep as the government as powerful and big possible. You are a vassal to the State, in his opinion.
Outrageous.
Apparently, Yost agrees with my analysis. Yost said in an interview that "to take this case, the attorney general has to be able to say that what these three did was part of their jobs—and that’s not an argument you can make with a straight face."
Well, yes, but Cordray believes that no wrongdoing was done. It was done for The One, and Cordray actively campaigned for Obama in 2008 Just like Jones-Kelley did.
The ends justify the means in Obama’s America, and that’s why Cordray is defending these criminals.
Steve Maley
Neil Stevens
Daniel Horowitz
This just shows how STUPID Americans can be....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Tuesday, November 17th at 5:39AM EST (link)Joe OUTED The Won for his socialism and STILL he was elected and NOW they are outraged at the way he is running the country! I know McCain would have been a nightmare for us but nonetheless I cannot fathom for a moment why ANYONE who considers themselves Independent would EVER vote for Obama!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Don't suppose anyone wants to compare what the OH AG
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, November 17th at 5:46AM EST (link)is doing to what the AK AG did for Sarah Palin? Thought not.
In Vino Veritas
Write a diary on it, Art
civil truth (Diary) Tuesday, November 17th at 11:12AM EST (link)It could be an interesting case study in AG-chief executive relationships – just we’re seeing another interesting (and dangerous) chapter developing with Holder and Obama.
But Palin is off-topic here, unless there’s a privacy issue akin to Joe the Plumber that’s under discussion. Even so, a diary would probably give more room for presenting the facts and for discussion. To do the AK situation justice here it would almost certainly turn into a threadjack.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
Doesn't matter if the healthcare bill passes.
Steph C (Diary) Tuesday, November 17th at 8:03AM EST (link)It’s one of those “little” indignities that get remarked upon but no understanding of the real ramifications. In that bill, your private records, not just your private medical records will be on file and shared across agencies for whatever reason deemed “necessary” to any and all said agencies. The language is purposely vague enough to cover anything.
And the people who complained shrilly about the Patriot Act and warrant less wire tapping are silent in spite of the fact that Obama didn’t undo it.
Somebody a few months ago mentioned the old campaign advertisements talking about women’s right to privacy in the doctor’s office and wondered what happened between then and now.
The 4th Amendment has been under attack for a long time by both sides of the aisle. The health care bill will be the death blow. It will also deal a huge blow to the Civil Rights Act but nobody sees that because it won’t be along a racial divide this time around. Nor will it be on religious grounds or any other descriptor specified in that Act.
It’s not that I’m accusing anybody in particular of anything but when a law has the potential for such abuse, it should never be considered. But government is all about ‘good intentions’ rather than consequences.
“[I]f the public are bound to yield obedience to laws to which they cannot give their approbation, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.” –Candidus in the Boston Gazette, 1772
Hillbilly Politics