It really is amazing how much The Road to Serfdom can tell us about today’s world. The following passage jumped out at me during the reading this week:
The power of the planner over our private lives would be no less complete if he chose not to exercise it by direct control of our consumption. Although a planned society would probably to some extent employ rationing and similar devices, the power of the planner over our private lives does not depend on this and would be hardly less effective if the consumer were nominally free to spend his income as he pleased. The source of this power over all consumption which in a planned society the authority would possess would be its control over production.
I want to look at this passage in the context of the health care debate. Dr. Donald Berwick has been named as a recess appointment by the President to be Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Let’s put aside for this discussion how this is incompatible with the President’s campaign promise of bringing transparency to government. Dr. Berwick has made public statements advocating rationing. Medicare and Medicaid are both in serious financial troubles. How does anyone not believe that this will lead to reduced service and coverage for those people on Medicare and Medicaid. Remember, under Obamacare, many states will be pushed into registering many, many new people on Medicare or Medicaid.
The passage above warns us that rationing and “death panels” aren’t the only potential loss of freedom we should watch for. Dr. Berwick will now have power to decide if new procedures or drugs are covered by medicare. Lets say that someone is able to create a new drug that cures Alzheimer’s. Let’s also say this drug is very expensive. Dr. Berwick (or any other planner / statist) might decide that the drug is simply to expensive for Medicare to cover. What happens if Medicare (through the increased “membership” from Obamacare) represents a large enough sector of the public that the manufacturer decides he can’t make money off his new drug? Perhaps he won’t produce it. Or perhaps he will produce it, but due to the much smaller market, it may cost three times as much as normal. This could significantly impact whether or not individuals who have somehow been lucky enough to keep their non-government insurance are able to get this drug. This is one of the dangers The Road to Serfdom warns us about with central planning. Dr. Berwick doesn’t have to deny specific individuals coverage in order to impact their ability to decide their own medical treatment.
This is the danger of a massive government run healthcare system. The government becomes so powerful that its decisions to not cover a specific treatment or drug can affect whether a person who is able to buy their own insurance, and thus not under any government run plan, can get the treatment they want and are able to pay for.
The solution? Government should get out of the healthcare business. Instead of increasing the number of people that are dependent on the government for medical care, we should look for ways to decrease the number of people on Medicare and Medicaid. The less power the government has, the more free each of us are to make our own choices.
For next week I want to cover chapters Nine and Ten. I believe I will have The Road to Serfdom finished by the first or second week of August. If there is a specific book you would like to cover next, let me know. I have two (Witness by Whittaker Chambers or Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis) that I am considering, but I could read either of these or something else.
Aaron Gardner
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Thanks Andyd for putting the book into the context of today...nt
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Sunday, July 11th at 9:54PM EST (link)….
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Good to see you, Andy, I have been waiting for your post. :)
penguin2 (Diary) Sunday, July 11th at 10:59PM EST (link)This book is amazing. I have to remind myself of the era and year (1944) it was written. You’ve already covered the HC implications and it is clear that the socialism of health care puts the government literally in charge of determining life and death for us. Scary thought.
Several quotes stood out to me that might be worth sharing here:
Another serious one to contemplate is his discussion about the Rule of Law which is the opposite of the “rule of status.” He indicates that the socialists (and Nazis) objected to “merely” formal justice, saying,
Remember Obama’s statement that the Constitution tells us what not to do, but it doesn’t “tell us what it ought to do.” That fits right in with the socialist belief in the government/state controlling outcomes or intervening in ways that actually make equal justice before the law impossible.
Then he talked about unrestrained legislating and that it is not necessarily at all following the Rule of Law. Legislating can be quite arbitrary in it’s outcomes, though they are legal. Legislating can enable the existence of “coercive powers” by the central government/planners.
One of the best quotes that is happening before our eyes today…
Hayek could be writing this book today. Look how much further we have gone down the road.
Thanks again, for your post, Andy. You mentioned a couple of choices for the next book, I’ll put in a vote for Witness by Whittaker Chambers. But whatever is convenient for you, just let us know so we can get the book.
Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. – Benjamin Franklin
When Good stands up to Evil, Evil blinks. – Vassar Bushmills
Conservative Education: Suggested Reading List
Activists Taking Action: Unified Patriots
Thank you
andyd (Diary) Tuesday, July 13th at 4:45AM EST (link)I appreciate the comments. This really is a great book, and I can really understand the resurgence in its popularity. If it were ever taught in school, there would be far less statist in the world today.
I am leaning towards Witness as well. If I don’t get any other comments between now and my next post, I am going to plan on doing Witness and pick up a copy.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
– John Adams
http://politicalfriendsblogs.com
Political debate without the name calling