we’re labeled crazies or paranoid or something. It doesn’t necessarily have to happen in 2010 or even under Obama. The real problem is that the groundwork is being laid, just as legislation or court rulings have laid the foundations of past indignities.

Roe v Wade, for instance went from ruling that abortions are legal to it’s not only legal to kill innocent souls but government will fund such killings.

we’re labeled crazies or paranoid or something. It doesn’t necessarily have to happen in 2010 or even under Obama. The real problem is that the groundwork is being laid, just as legislation or court rulings have laid the foundations of past indignities.

Roe v Wade, for instance went from ruling that abortions are legal to it’s not only legal to kill innocent souls but government will fund such killings.

I hate to send traffic to the (profanity alert!) ACLU, but this needs to go viral. It’s only a slight stretch to get from Obama’s health care plan to this. And make sure noone shows this to Nancy Pelosi. We don’t want her getting any ideas!

It’s scary any way you slice it (omg unintentional), but this was in response to the warrant less wiretapping programs.

Fwiw, I don’t care who does this kind of stuff. I oppose them.

Probably not popular to say here, but the ACLU does do a lot of good work, at least on my issue of campaign finance regulation. You don’t have to agree with them all the time or even very often to recognize and commend them for a generally principled stand on what they believe is right.

Sean Parnell
President
Center for Competitive Politics
http://www.campaignfreedom.org

That was, other than the middle name, MY name! and I do have HBP!

Seriously though, this scenario is playing out. Keep in mind the foundation for a national database of your health records was already in the stimulus bill ( or was it one of the TARP bills).

See? It’s already getting hard to keep up with this stuff. Stay vigilant!

Here is “Dinner with Obama: A Parable”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2312735/posts

This has been going on for several years already.
The government computer center in West Virginia was set up for that purpose, and tracks electronic bank transactions in real time.

Regards

Thanks for posting it.

doesn’t mean they aren’t after you…

Sure, but I did see this commercial or one like it by them as a reference to Bush. It was good then too. It was an anti-Bush obviously.

Just remember when you see the ACLU doing something right it has an ultimate purpose you won’t like.
For example:
My brother used the ACLU to sue the PA State police over a traffic stop. PA SP screwed up and it cost them. My brother won, three bad cops got slapped down the world is great. Right?
George KARNES, Appellant, v. Thomas SKRUTSKI.
Sounds like justice was done. ACLU took the case on a contigency.
Here is the problem. My brother won a pittance, and that was OK with him, it was the principle of the thing right?
ACLU on the other hand won legal fees, etc which amounted to all of their costs and attorneys fees. Their attorneys are volunteers. A lot of money.
I think $140,000 or so.

Now how many child molestors and NAMBLA members do you suppose they were able to defend with that money? Of course to fund the idiotic stuff they do they have to mix in a little of the normal. But the only purpose of the normal is just to pay for the idiotic.

As I told my brother at the time; you make a deal with the devil he always wins.