No More Mr. Nice Guy !!


Self-righteous leftist politicians – notably the late & unlamented Senators Frank Church & Teddy Kennedy – played a role in the early 1970′s very much like the "wikileaks" dump of the past several months. While I was outraged then, in this era of terrorism, the exposure of sensitive material is far more egregious.

No longer can we afford to play Sir Galahad with these animals and their enablers. This isn’t like previous wars. This time the enemy is among us, looking for ways to murder our people, destroy our culture and, essentially, to replace the progress of civilization achieved in the past 1500 years with the mad ravings of a pederastic savage.

Before the liberal witch hunt, the CIA had some extraordinary tools to effect this at a distance, virtually instantaneously, silently (not suppressed,  SILENT ) and undetectably. That information is out there, in the heads of technicians and intelligence officers, no matter what the goody-two-shoes have done to destroy the data, no matter how much the PC government has forgotten.

It is past time to discard Jerry Ford’s ludicrous Executive Order prohibiting assassination as a tool of foreign policy. It is time to undertake a campaign with the Mossad and other intelligence agencies of governments not dominated by beta males and pro-actively kill the enemy,  wherever  we can find them, BEFORE they strike. The traitor(s) who compromised this information and the socialist twit who released it would be a good place to start. Further, I personally believe the editorial boards of the NY Times, Washington Post and similar anti-American publications should be given some enhanced interrogations with an eye to filing charges of knowingly giving aid to the enemy, if not flat-out treason. They have been doing this for at least 40 years and they need to be constrained from continuing this practice.

We cannot afford to carry on as if the enemy will operate by any of the norms which have developed in civilized societies, for the enemy are crazed flea-bitten savages in behavior if not literally. We cannot fight for our lives while the duplicitous leftists stab us in the back and aid those external enemies.

No, no more Mr. Nice Guy. We need to return to the principles of the nation which waged war on the terrorists’ ancestors (both literally and philosophically) under Thomas Jefferson, the America which brooked no attack on our people or territory in 1846 and 1941; we must embrace and follow the principles described in JFK’s Inaugural Address and exemplified by Ronald Reagan.

It won’t happen as long as this petulant, effete, clueless, incompetent, narcissistic wimp sits in the Oval Office, but if we can’t impeach him for malfeasance before 2013, this should be a key campaign position in 2012 at the very least . . . and the first policy the new President implements. Those who hurt us CANNOT be allowed to escape retribution. They need to know to a certainty we will give no quarter nor will we forget their acts.



RSS feed

11 Comments Leave a comment

Really?

lewa25 Monday, November 29th at 11:23PM EST (link)

You really think assasination is something that we should legalize? It’s that just a little bit over the top (though granted it’s more than likely assasination is a tactic put into use, we just don’t hear about it)?

What I’m curious about is though, is that if we did become the aggressors and actively went after terrorists, what more damage would that do? I see few options in terms of aggression that don’t include dropping nuclear bombs and destroying everyone, innocent or not, in the Middle East to completely end terrorism.

Trying to stop terrorism completely to me is like trying to end the ‘war on drugs’ we can battle it, but in the end it’ll never be completely rooted out.

Honestly the only time that terrorism with truely be gone would be the after period of wwIII when we’ve all nuked each other so much that there arn’t enough people left to remember what it was we were so adamantly trying to kill each other for.

But then I’m sure mankind will find another excuse to kill each other over, it’s pretty much just our nature to dislike others for not being like ourselves. What that difference is is irrelevent, we’ll always find it in something, and we’ll always hate it, and thus it will always escalate into violence, until we finally destroy ourselves.

G'bye (nt)

Neil Stevens (Diary) Monday, November 29th at 11:30PM EST (link)

RS contributing editor, technical administrator, and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Thank you.

jdw4america (Diary) Monday, November 29th at 11:59PM EST (link)

Stupidity gives me a headache. So does inane, childish babbling about causing the end of the world if we actually start defending ourselves instead of playing appeasement with butchers and psychopaths.

 
 

Dude!

mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 12:08AM EST (link)

Like, Visualize Whirled Peas!

 

Your writing is at the depth of a typical Hollywood movie script

JSobieski (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 12:38AM EST (link)

I could literally hear thes oundtrack playing.

Since you bring up World Wars, I would point out that WWII happened because evil was not confronted until it was too late.

Opportunistic wars are imposed on democracies,not because they are perceived as too strong, but rather because they are perceived as being too weak.

The US is the one nation in the world that cannot afford to be perceived as too weak. If the US ever falls, freedom will leave the earth and there will be a thousand years of darkness before you and George Clooney can even utter the words “Sudan” or “Rwanda”.

Put another way, the “differences” as you put them are NOT irrelevant. You are blessed to live in a country that allows you to have tha illusion. One of the big negative side effects of continuous freedom is an utter lack of appreciation for it.

Terrorism will never be gone from the planet any more than murder or robbery will (or stupidity and cliches for that matter).

The meme that most wars are just a bunch of people killing each other because of mere “differences” is just plain historically ignorant. What, the Germans just didn’t like Polish literature in 1939? Maybe the North Sudanese thought the South Sudaneses engaged in poor personal grooming habbits?

People have reasons when they kill. They have motivations for genocide. We don’t agree with them or understand really, but smart people understand that such behavioral motivations exist.

You paint a picture of false options, false oppurtunities, and then begrudge any viable paths to proceed.

Yup, you are a hollywood screen writer.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

Nice takedown

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 12:52AM EST (link)

Though it was somewhat akin to taking down a cockroach with a Magnum, heh.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

I did it for me, far better than arguing with friends over Palin

JSobieski (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 12:56AM EST (link)

nt

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 

Sobieski - You should expand that to a diary (nt)

Blue_Collar_Muse (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 3:53AM EST (link)

Blue Collar Muse

Smaller Government! Lower Taxes! Stronger Defense! More Liberty! Complete Transparency!

Thanks, maybe I will. I always intended to write something like that on Morris Child's birthday

JSobieski (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 6:32AM EST (link)

He was the most successfully but least well known spy in US history.

My rules of the road for primary season.
Rule #1: Vote for YOUR first choice in the primaries
Rule #2: Vote for the R in the general.
Rule #3: Don’t let anyone convince you to violate Rule #1 or Rule #2
Rule #4: When in a center-right argument, reaffirm Rules #1-#3–it will help us all to get along better.
Rule #5: If you are using the language of the left, you probably aren’t furthering conservativism
Rule #6: The priority is issues first, candidates second, and supporters third. Nobody is bigger than the issues. Conversely, if you spend your time focusing on supporters, you are wasting everyone’s time.

STOP THE MADNESS!

A reduction in the rate of spending increases is NOT a cut!
In-state tuition for illegals is NOT amnesty!
Requiring someone to pay their medical bills is NOT an individual mandate!
Reducing tax rates is NOT a tax increase!

 
 
 

Your heart's in the right place, but that's pretty naive

aesthete (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 12:49AM EST (link)

Of course we’re never going to wholly eliminate terrorism, just as we will never completely get rid of murder or theft. The question is, how much terrorism can we get rid of, and at what cost? Clearly, we cannot dedicate all of our resources and sacrifice our essential freedoms at the altar of terrorism prevention: unlike conventional wars like WWII or the Civil War, or even our enemies in the Cold War, our enemy in this war is one that will be with us from now to the hereafter. However, it would be careless to ignore the threat that terrorism poses in the future. IMO, too many of our liberties have gone the way of the dodo since the commencement of the GWOT. Even so, it is (and should be) an argument about the appropriate trade-offs between liberty and security (I would likely be on the far end of “liberty” in that argument), not a call for the federal government to abdicate its responsibility in keeping the US safe from existential threats.

The act of defending any of the cardinal virtues has today all the exhilaration of a vice – G.K. Chesterton

 

Too bad Neil gak'd you

Bill S (Diary) Tuesday, November 30th at 1:07AM EST (link)

I was looking forward to the great acid, tye-dye shirts, and peace sign necklaces. We could all go to the Haight and sing “Give Peace a Chance”

Nah. I prefer punching hippies.

“It’s such a fine line between stupid, and clever.” – David St. Hubbins