st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }
<!– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”"; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;} p.MsoBodyText, li.MsoBodyText, div.MsoBodyText {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:24.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”; font-weight:bold; mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:”Times New Roman”;}
Are American Bankers the Jews of 1938 Germany?
On November 9th and 10th, 1938 the German Nazi government under Adolph Hitler ordered the attack on the Jewish population of Germany and Austria and confiscated or destroyed their property.
Are there similarities between that occurrence and the Obama administration demonizing of the American Bankers?
Is the Obama administration planning to do the same thing? I don’t believe so at this time but denunciation of the Jewish population was only the beginning. The reason the Nazi’s used this particular tactic was that they needed a common enemy to focus the populations’ hatred on.
There is a similar tactic used today against the management of financial institutions. They make too much money. They don’t care about their customers. They’re only in profit for themselves. They are destroying the country.
Let’s examine who the real owners of American financial institutions are.
The majority of stock held in banks and Wall Street institutions are held by mutual and retirement funds. Those funds represent millions of private citizens. Only a small percentage is owned by the executives of financial institutions.
When the administration demonizes “Bankers and Wall Street,” they are in fact demonizing you, the public who are the majority owners. I will agree that in some cases it seems that management of these “Wall Street Firms” and the management of banks are being overpaid, especially when they are creating losses. What is not mentioned in the speeches given by the President and administration officials is that the people who receive what they claim are excessive compensation are contractually required bonuses for making a profit for their divisions.
Let us not forget that contracts between two parties are in fact property rights and property rights are protected by the U.S. Constitution. The only parties who have a right to dictate compensation are the stockholders of a corporation.
Even though the administration committed billions of dollars to “financial institution bailouts,” they may not change the terms of a contract retroactively. That can only be done legally by renegotiating a contract.
What is the purpose of these attacks upon management? Just like in Germany of the 1930’s it is to misdirect the true cause of the problems existing in the economy and targeting the management of financial institutions as being evil.
In reality the economy can only function if a streamlined financial system exists. The public deposits money in banks and invests in Wall Street in order to create a profit for themselves. Pursuing this self-interest provides the basic cash flow for an economy to grow. Banks collect money, pay interest to the saver and lends out the money to businesses and buyers of major products such as homes and automobiles. Without this system of financing, the economy could not grow.
We can find many faults with how the financial sector operates, but that is a part of the financial system. Those companies that operate within the rules of the capitalistic system will prosper, and those that do not will eventually go bankrupt. No bailouts and let true capitalism work.
Fred Speckmann
Sparks, Nevada
commonsenseforamericans.webs.com
Steve Maley
KnightsofMalta
Hey Sparky, Hitler used the Jews as a foil
hickorystick (Diary) Saturday, April 24th at 6:43PM EST (link)The real bankers of Germany wanted to get rid of the competition (the Jews). Hitler was not going to get rid of all bankers, he needed them way too much. The war could not function without bankers. He used them,, they used him, one was as evil as the other.
As far as Wall Street bankers, they are stealing from the people’s retirement savings and pensions. The CEO put’s his board in place, then robs the bank. If you think these bonuses are legitamite, I’m sorry for you. Look up Washington Mutual Bank, and see who has the money, and who is broke. The New York banks are always looking for someone to enslave. If Obama is railing at the banks, he is handing them trillions with the hand behind his back. The New York Banks profited mightily off slavery. Lehman Brothers was a Cotton Exchange. Don’t think the NY boys are your friends. They are slave masters, no more, no less.
I don't know where to start... the ignorance here is stunning...
H (Diary) Sunday, April 25th at 4:31PM EST (link)First of all, a corporate CEO is elected or put in place by the board. The board, in turn, is elected by the stockholders. I think you are struggling to describe “crony capitalism” here, which any good conservative would abhor (think HRC sitting on the board of the defunct TCBY frozen yogurt concern or Walmart).
Second of all, as the OP points out, a CEO salary is a contractual matter between the stockholders and the CEO. Your opinion on the fairness of it all is worth as much as the next guy’s, and his is worth a bucket of warm spit, unless he happens to be a stockholder in that corporation. It would behoove us to direct our ire at the enabling politicians who, under the guise of “regulation” direct $ at their friends and family members at the taxpayers expense. Painting all CEOs with the same brush of greed is not a conservative approach to the problem.
Washington Mutuals stockholders had to sue to meet
hickorystick (Diary) Sunday, April 25th at 6:36PM EST (link)This was a good company taken over by a greedy man. Thousands of people were layed off, stockholders destroyed, all for the greed of one man and a few in his inner circle. Before this man was hired, WAMU held it’s own mortgage paper. Exploiting the fact Fannie Mae was buying bad paper, he took on thousands of loans ad expanded into areas no wise banker would. He gained huge bonuses and destryed a 105 year old bank, that had been very solid before him. Why Republicans defend this sort of thing I have no idea. We used to be about the small businessman. It’s not all corporations, but it’s enough. And the ones not participating didn’t say a word. Wall Street and their bought politicians have become a threat to the Republic. Since they cannot police themselves, bring the money back to the home states.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-21/wamu-shareholders-win-right-to-try-to-force-meeting-update1-.html
I understand your point,
H (Diary) Sunday, April 25th at 8:46PM EST (link)but just as the democrats abuse the high offices of government, unprincipled men will abuse the high offices of capitalism (with the help of those government guys of the first part).
If you’re going to paint all corporate CEO’s as looters and thieves, it plays right into the hands of the Obamanistas wwho want to tear down the system and replace it with their Marxist dream.
there used to be a business mantra in the 70's
hickorystick (Diary) Sunday, April 25th at 10:26PM EST (link)If I don’t do it, someone else will. The morals went down from there. were 14 trillion in debt, and much of it can be layed at the feet off wall street, and the off-street operators. It’s not worth the risk raising capitol, or valuing businesses, this way.
I know not everyone single CEO is corrupt, it’s the structure that is corrupt. The CEO’s are not speaking up though, to protect the integrity of the system. Yes, that would mean ratting someone out, and suffering the consequences.