Sue them into oblivion.
Sue the person who made the request for him to leave and the decision to have him removed from the event.
I’m sure there is some legal argument like the 1st Amendment or something about supporting and promoting terrorism/insurrection etc.

Why would any parent want their child to go to this propaganda school to hear only one side of the story?

Parents: TAKE YOUR KIDS OUT NOW !!!!!!!!!!

He forgot to cry out “Don’t taze me Bro!”

Had he done that, perhaps the MSLM would have considered it newsworthy and drawn more attention to it.

Didn’t know this was going on over there. Thanks for the update, Ben!

I’d already stopped giving them money over some other slights but now I’ll pass this on to every alum I know. MSA has always been an indoctrination group, not an outreach group.

Especially those of the Moslem persuasion.

Ben, a little more than midway through your piece, you say this:

“However, the reason for the censorship in this case appears far more devious than typical political correctness.”

In examining what comes after (and rereading it several times, just to make sure), I see nothing in your post to lead me to believe that the administration at UCF is little more than the useful politically correct idiots that Islamists desire in America.

Honestly, I was expecting you to demonstrate that some radical Islamists are in positions of leadership at UCF, or that the radical Islamist groups are big booster at UCF. But no such links are established.

I agree the behavior toward the Islamists and toward those who exercise their free speech rights in asking questions of them in the American fashion is deplorable. And the leadership at UCF should be made to answer for this. So, please don’t misunderstand.

But I was expecting you to demonstrate something great and terrible, as the case may be. And it may be there. I’ve missed things before. But I’m just curious why you used the rest of your piece to point out what most of us here at Redstate already believe and know: That Islamists in America are bent on the destruction of America and the forcible installation of Islamic law throughout the globe.

And why?

Those who did the deed should explain it, including who directed their actions.

   I recall my father having a little book titled None Dare Call It Treason!  It outlined the communist movement in the United States during the Vietnam War and the height of the so-called “Cold War” between us and the Soviet Union.  It got lost somewhere, but I do want to find it someday and read it.  It has a lot to do with the current climate of “Political Correctness” that is playing into the hands of these would-be ghazis in our midst.

   To this day, I look upon our so-called “institutions of higher learning” with a mixture of contempt and ridicule.  They’re festering sores of Left-wing radicalism and anti-American police states where anyone who has an opinion that runs against the cliques controlling the places will be harrassed into submission or expelled.  “How long,” I may ask, “Before we’re forced to expel them?”

   On the term “ghazi” (spelled “gah-ZEE”), that was used by the Turks in late medieval times when they were setting up the Ottoman Empire on the ruins of what was once the eastern Roman empire.  It designated their roles as Islamic holy warriors who penetrated the religious frontiers and waged perpetual war against non-muslim peoples beyond them.  We all know what happened over time — the Ottoman Turks finally captured Constantinople and became a source of terror for the peoples of the Danube river valley and Mediterranean, until that old bugaboo of empires, stagnation and corruption set in and (thankfully) made them weaker.

   These guys know we have no shortage of malicous individuals masquerading as “intellectuals” in our midst, doing whatever they can to undermine our countries.  Who knows what these creatures expect from their new masters?  A convenient lessening of the jiziyah tax?  A free pass on apostacy if they “convert”?

   It seems that Islamists and communists do think very much alike, abiding by that old proverb: the enemy of my enemy is my ally.

de-fund UCF, or at least the parts that sponsor this sort of thing. Write or call your legislator.

Unless Americans have had their heads buried in the sand for the last 10 years, we know what the aim of every Muslim group is. I think that the solution to the problem is not creating more platforms for them to preach from, but to introduce them as quickly as possible to their seventy two virgins, POST HASTE!

Islam is NOT a religion, it is a Theo-political ideology intent on destroying this country’s values and inserting it’s form of law

“A Flock of Sheep”

OK… on the 72 virgins thing. First of all, only an oppressive society would be able to find 72 virgins. (I know, totally chauvinistic & all). Second, why would any woman want to be part of a society that requires her to be a submissive sexual vessel to some nut, after she is dead?? Do women get 72 virgins? Are they male or are they required to put on girl on girl shows for the boys??
Enough of that crap. I understand inviting controversial speakers. I even agree. However, based on academic institutional responses to right wing speakers, that in this case the questioner from the audience was expelled, is confusing. In many other right wing cases, those speakers were shut down, in fear of their personal safety, and heckled beyond possible reason, with no intervention by the universities involved, at all… or other than to escort the right wing speaker out!
These actions at our higher educational institutions, shows the public that there is no reason for public money, taxpayers money, to be spent on or provided to these institutions. If the speech &/or questions of right wingers are unacceptable, then the preachings of the left & radical terrorist sponsors are also unacceptable. If these institutions plan to sponsor the leftist talk & silence the right wing talk, then the institutions need to pay the price of no more support!
W/ an federal Attorney General who fails to finish the prosecution of voter intimidation activists (PA Black Panther intimidation case in Philly suburb), the possibility he would investigate the violations of speech and/or association, the biased use of public funds, the biased support of groups who vow an anti-American attitude & who in this case actually support anti-American terrorists or terrorism sponsors, is non existent. It proves, legally, we can expect nothing from our government until this administration is replaced.
I cannot accept the notion we deserve these treatments, nor that we are guilty of horrible crimes warranting such treatments, nor that it is America alone who is guilty & no other nation or peoples. Additionally, it is NOT the responsibility of the government to determine our guilt and to then go about imposing or permitting the imposition of punishments or paybacks, according to some federal bureaucrats formula for reparation.
America’s failures, and yes we have them, do not represent failures among mankind that dwarf any others. We are among others, equal. Our crimes are no better nor no worse.
But it is “we” who will determine our guilt or innocence & it is “we” who will determine our penance, if any!
Jimmy Carter also lectured us. He was sent home when Reagan won in a landslide. Perhaps Obama faces the same result? Perhaps not. Many will vote for him again, thinking we owe this to blacks. I say, payments are to be made only if the public decides we owe them. Otherwise, we owe nothing to Obama. There are other significantly more qualified blacks who could easily out do Obama & show America what real leadership is. Obama ain’t it!