- Max Blumenthal
The left is trying their utmost, of late, to make Limbaugh the symbol of all Republicans, and then tear down Limbaugh to tear us all down. They are trying their hardest, with Obama fecklessly “leading” the charge, to paint a picture of Republican members of Congress groveling and scraping before Limbaugh (if only!) because they apparently, and absurdly, think that this is some strategy for getting (R) votes on (D) legislation.
The trickle-down of this so-called strategy has the left’s propaganda organs nearly daily touting new evidence of how irrelevant Rush is becoming in the age of Obama. See how clever they are? If Rush is the power of the party, and he is irrelevant, so too must be the party, and therefore you are an outsider if you agree with Limbaugh or Republicans.
One of the recent tactics is touting polling data regarding how popular El Rushbo is. Last week, Max Blumenthal took top prize in this category by assessing a poll from October, conducted by Democratic research firm Greenberg-Quinlan-Rosner, to conclude that Limbaugh is less popular than Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright. Can’t you just feel the left-wing glee? (If not, search Google or Technorati for the Blumenthal conclusion and witness the poll-gasms first-hand.) Titles like “Americans Prefer Terrorist to Limbaugh,” “Rush Limbaugh Less Popular Than Radical Ayers or Reverend Wright” and so on screamed across the left online.
Blumenthal’s article, titled “Rush Limbaugh Loses a Popularity Contest” (originally titled, as you can see from the URL, “America To Rush, Drop Dead”), is so much of an overreach it overreaches overreaching. As a matter of fact, despite the frenzied parroting of this now KnownFact™ across the left-o-sphere, it’s just flat false.
When you open the PDF of the report, which hilariously displays as titled MoveOn in your browser window (go figure), the section that reports on the favorability of William Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Rush Limbaugh has three columns. Blumenthal concludes that Ayers and Wright are preferred over Limbaugh because he has a higher rating of “cold” feelings toward him, from column 1. See the image below:

As you can see, Limbaugh does produce higher “cold” feelings than the other two among all voters. So Blumenthal is right? Rush is less popular? Mmmmm, no. Look at the next image. The right-hand column:

You see, Rush also engenders more WARM feelings. So Blumenthal’s popularity claim is already looking lame. In fact, it was looking so lame apparently the pollsters emailed him, and he updated his story with this:
(As the firm points out in an email, it’s true that Wright and Ayers both had lower “warm” ratings than Limbaugh—as you’d expect for men who have virtually no constituencies.)
Ok, so now he’s been made aware, but changes not a bit the content of his story aside from this aside. Still, you think, perhaps he’s right from a certain point of view. Is it safe to say that Rush is less popular if more people dislike him, despite having more people like him? Well, no. It isn’t. And Blumenthal ought to have known this. You see, there’s a third column of data.

Heh. Look at those numbers. Here’s the page excerpt in total (click for full size):
The standard measure of likability in polling data like this is derived by calculating the spread between favorability and unfavorability. In this case, as was clearly spelled out in the data, Limbaugh is obviously more popular. Not for nothing, but the every day understanding of popularity favors Limbaugh, which Blumenthal tacitly admits when discussing the constituency sizes. Even so, under his amorphous definition of favorability as likeability, Blumenthal is clearly flat wrong.
Still, you’ll find this story cited web-wide as an indictment of the supposedly defunct right. Look, they say, Limbaugh is not liked, and Ayers is! This is the new order of things and you’d better get with the program.
The war on Limbaugh, I suspect, is just getting started. The left in this country is trying to seize an opportunity, to seize power, and they’ll use whatever Orwellian methods they have at their disposal to make you believe they are right. Even lying about publicly available polling information. Seeing which Republicans buy in to their rhetoric will be diagnostic.
- Caleb Howe
Update: I list some of the leftblogs that are propagating the lie here. Andrew Sullivan just can’t help himself, can he?

Daniel Horowitz
Neil Stevens
Steve Maley
Jake Walker
Who knew
NRPax (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 5:57PM EST (link)That popularity contests were still important this far after high school? Guess it’s a good thing I don’t care about things like that.
Silly leftists...
kweiss01 Monday, February 9th at 5:57PM EST (link)The more they deride Rush, the more free publicity he gets and the more “relevent” he becomes. Fortunately, I think this tactic is backfiring.
Figures can't lie but liars sure can figure (n/t)
Finrod (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:01PM EST (link).
Let’s get down to brass tacks here. How much for the ape?
What do you expect from graduates of 'progressive math'?
Xasteius (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:02PM EST (link)or would that ‘creative accounting’?
Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!
The only poll that counts is the one at the ballot box.
I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be a Chance/Soros hybrid.
Don't dismiss them
kowalski (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:11PM EST (link)This is how tenured professors actually think.
Defend Liberty — Join the NRA | Live in Massachusetts? Join GOAL.
This is straight from
robmikpet (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:18PM EST (link)Alinsky. When you take down your enemies, identify, isolate, condemn and destroy.
Rush is the most effective conservative spokeman in the country that is why he is the target, plain and simple.
Our job is to tune in your radio and fight. Rush is our Petraeus, our Patton. And in the spirit of Patton who said “Patriotism is not dying for your country it is making the other SOB die for his” let’s make liberalism die and conservatism live.
If they are attacking Rush, then they aren't paying
Praying (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:24PM EST (link)attention to anything else we’re doing and that will benefit us. Last I checked, Rush wasn’t running for anything. And although he is ardently disliked by the left (as were Ayers and Wright by the right), he hasn’t blown up anything or yelled God D*** America from his bully pulpit. The libs are getting desperate, I’m telling you. My hope is that the more deranged they become, the more the “moderate” whatevers in the middle move away from them and refuse to be associated with all that insanity. It would be especially good for us to come up with a REAL GOP icon (no offense to Rush, of course)
No!!!11!1!!1!1! The Bilderbergers are coming
They are messing with the wrong man....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:29PM EST (link)Rush’s numbers only go up when the libs try to take him down…..so keep it up you idiots
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
Rush is not a politician--
loewenbrau (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:39PM EST (link)so why is there even a poll out on him? This is a smear tactic used by the followers of Saul Alinsjy. This will accelerate and spill over to anyone else the extreme left thinks may get in their way,——-after all , they have their person in the W.H.—-can’t be too hard to complete all the instructions in Alinsky’s book (to take over the governemnt). Oh! except for persons like R.L. — must neutralize them. Keep the drumbeat going — sound familiar? Look up Goebbels.
They want a focus of eeeevvvuuullll.
Achance (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:47PM EST (link)Once the stimulus doesn’t stimulate and you don’t get a new car, and Obama isn’t buying your gas and all that, they can blame it on the evil right wing radio talkers led by Rush and use it to justify Fairness Doctrine II.
You guys really need to study Saul Alinsky. In fact, you should have read it a long time ago if you fancy yourself interested in politics. If more had, we wouldn’t have had so much fratricide even with an awful candidate like McCain. It was the most amazing thing to hear people on this board say they were going to stay home or vote third party, some even claimed they were going to vote for BHO “so we could get another Reagan.” Hell we’ll be lucky to ever get another election that means anything.
In Vino Veritas
And even we manage another election
mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 6:57PM EST (link)AND WIN IT, it pretty much won’t matter. By the summer recess we’ll have legislation passed that will make the New Deal look like the Good Deal. And Republicans could hold the White House, 75 seats in the Senate, 400 seats in the House and appoint new SCOTUS replacements for Souter, Ginsberg, Kennedy, and Stevens and the legislation wouldn’t get turned back.
It’s going to be a Brave New World.
Seriously?
ryeinn Monday, February 9th at 10:49PM EST (link)I’m sorry. I can’t help but ask. Seriously? All three branches and by such huge margins? When even the lash against Bush that hit both the House and Senate couldn’t even come close for Obama?
And Rush? All this hoopla over him? Why?
Hey three day wonder...
mbecker908 (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 10:53PM EST (link)since you’re too dense to figure this one out, you really should take up something less taxing than “thought”.
Try crocheting. Or tiddly winks. Or pretty much anything that doesn’t waste our bandwidth.
Sheesh.
No, I'm actually curious.
ryeinn Monday, February 9th at 11:10PM EST (link)Please. I do want to know here. What leads you to believe this? I see evidence that the Dems can lose seats after the honeymoon ends. But that many?
As for crocheting – meh, my knuckles hurt too much. As for wasting your bandwidth…c’mon.
And yes, three days old. Sorry. I’ve been lurking for a while without registering. My bad. Should have done so ages ago. Pardon my faux pas.
I will try and answer your question Ryeinn
kyle8 (Diary) Monday, February 9th at 11:35PM EST (link)Once a nation goes down the road of socialism, there is almost no turning back. What happens is that the takers so far outnumber the producers that by just voting their own self interest then Government continues to grow.
Now from time to time things get so bad in a socialistic economy that they do institutes some reforms and cut some taxes, but the power of the state does not diminish, instead they become even more intrusive.
Witness Great Britain, which did turn back a very little of it’s former socialism but has become a frightful almost Big Brotherish nanny state which seeks to spy on and control even the most minute elements of its peoples lives.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Interesting point.
ryeinn Monday, February 9th at 11:56PM EST (link)First off, thank you for your frank and courteous reply. (A Post Script, but added at the top: Sorry for the rambling process of this reply, I’m not a magnificent writer and I tend to sometimes think on paper. )
Here’s my issue. First off, I doubt we’ve reached the point where those who contribute nothing outnumber those who contribute. I know you didn’t say that, I’m just saying. And even if we had I don’t think we’ve reached a voting overflow like that.
And I do agree that socialism isn’t a cure to all our woes. But, Bush’s tax cuts were not the panacea that I keep hearing tax cuts are. The Nanny State is an issue. But look at what happened in our last administration, who, if anything, were very un-socialistic (if that’s a word). Note the NSA wiretapping (and there have been admissions that the scope of that program was a lot larger than previously admitted). Big Brother? Just a bit.
I think there is a need for a bit of moderation. I’ve rarely found anything in life that isn’t best done with some nuance. Certain parts of western society as we know it could never have reached their place of dominance without some gov’t intervention. One with a special place in my heart is science. Look what happens to basic research when the gov’t withdraws a large bit of the funding. We’re slowly losing our place of dominance. And this implies that money needs to be spent in other places as well. Education, from elementary to high school, needs funding, not unfunded mandates like NCLB.
This will take some time, but there is some hope for you...
civil truth (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 12:31AM EST (link)if you stick around and continue to ask serious questions. You have been listening to too many Democratic/liberal talking point – I hear them coming out, but you are at least questioning them some.
So I hope others here are a bit patient with you. There are some really well-informed people who can address these things in depth.
Remember first that conservatism and Republican are not identical, although there is a substantial overlap.
Let me just give you some food for thought.
The NSA program differ from Big Brother in that the NSA program was designed to combat enemies abroad – primarily terrorist and their domestic supporters. Big Brother’s surveillance was to neutralize domestic enemies, i.e. the populace. Critical distinction. And if the NSA program has turned into monitoring ordinary citizens then conservatives would be first in line to attack it. We recognize that there is a delicate balance between repelling attacks from enemies abroad and unduly curtailing liberties at home.
As far the path to socialism, what a number of us here see is a series of actions, each one of limited impact – but that coordinated will set a tipping point that will rapidly accelerate and be almost impossible to reverse as normally antagonistic players (the separation of power between private and public entities) enter into a mutually reinforcing relationship. Example: policies that essentially forced unionization, which in turn can impose dues for political action to further strengthen the interests of the union leaders. It’s these positive feedback cyles that are so dangerous because even a small amplitude rapidly grows to dominance.
I woudl agree that government does have some role in promoting basic science research; the problem in recent years is that it tended to get captured by crony interests which misdirected it, and made it an easier target to cut. Also, much of our loss in leadership in science research relates to the failings of our K-12 schooling. It’s sad that my children did not have the opportunities to learn real science that I did.
Stick around at RedState – there are some really well-informed people here with a lot of expertise.
Now with the ability to monitor domestic conversations comes the temptation to nission creep, which is why it needs some level of ovesight. But it’s clear that unlike some earlier administrations, the Bush administration did not mission creep, at least from what I’ve read.
The greatest evil…is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voice. Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern. -C.S. Lewis
http://www.gmsplace.com/
"The Nanny state is an issue." Very believeable.
icbm (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 1:15AM EST (link)You’re going to have to pretend better than that.
No one who thinks that we have become or are becoming socialist says, “The Nanny state is an issue.”
Nor does he go on to call Bush “Big Brother” for wiretapping conversations between foreign terrorists and American citizens in order to protect us.
Hell, I’d favor impeachment for a president who did NOT listen in on telephone calls from terrorists overseas to Americans at home. Avoiding measures like this is what allowed 9/11 to happen. Not sure if you’re old enough to remember that day.
Friggin troll. Take your little hiney back to Kos.
Accusations and Discussion
ryeinn Tuesday, February 10th at 6:45AM EST (link)Let me field this one first.
No, I’m not a troll. I’m not hijacking discussion or posting flame bait. I’m not here to be inflammatory.
Now, a real response. See, I had heard of some mission creep happening. Now if I recall my reading it wasn’t by design, they weren’t slowly growing in what they were monitoring. The creep came about because of technological issues, when they designed the dragnet for the NSA program they cast too wide of a net because they couldn’t cast a smaller one. Not something I’m proud of as an American.
I’m intrigued by your idea of the slow path to socialism. The union policy is…well…questionable. I wonder, out loud, how to still keep the right to unionize without setting up this gov’t backing of this huge unionization. Unions can be a big problem when they get entrenched and do things solely for the cash. (Example, plumbers union in Philadelphia requiring installation of more pipes than necessary for no-flush urinals). But there can be useful things from them.
As for the science issue. A big part of the reason I am so passionate about science is that I teach it. Now, I can’t speak for everywhere, but one of the problems I see is a culture problem. Yeah, the kids need k-12 science instruction. But part of the problem is the culture. Science isn’t seen as something worthwhile as a career.
let me apologize for some of the wild comments
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 7:19AM EST (link)We have been under attack for quite a while from seminar lefty trolls and some of your comments inadvertently hit some of the same notes.
As for science and the public you had better be concerned about how much less credibility scientists are going to have when more people finally realize that AGW is a colossal scare hoax.
(just search this site for all discussions and reasons I say that)
As for our becoming socialist, well we already are. What this huge bill is going to do is place so much debt on the government we will be forced to use inflation to control it.
Once the economy starts to inflate commodity prices begin to rise again and that will cause even more misery and will kill any sort of recovery that may have begun.
The answer to this crises of course will be more government. That is the way the cycle goes, We have seen it all before in dozens of countries. We are not unique.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
You doubt we've reached the point where "those who
janis (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 9:09AM EST (link)contribute nothing outnumber those who contribute”? Here’s an example for you:
I did my son and daughter in law’s taxes for them last week. Due to the Earned Income Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit, the two of them are getting a return of over $4000. Without paying one single dollar in Federal Income Tax.
Multiply that by all the families just like them, and what do you have?
You have a permanent group of voters who are focused like a laser on getting that sweet, sweet “refund” check every year without realizing, or maybe even caring, that it indentures them to the very government that “gives” it to them. And all while the elderly die for lack of health care, thank you Tom Daschle, because it’s just not “cost effective” to treat people who are going to die anyway. All while people like my husband’s nephew, a construction worker whose parents voted for Obama, will watch his company, already down to 8 people from 40 just a year ago, lose out on bidding jobs that are federally funded because his company is non-union.
But, hey, why worry? If Obama and Co. don’t manage to totally destroy every single safeguard that prevented domestic terror attacks, ruin our economy for generations–or forever– and otherwise cancel out all that made America what it has been, then God knows it won’t be for lack of trying.
As for science, it will be what government tells you it is, not what the evidence says it is.
No, you're actually a troll, an idiot, or both.
Achance (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 1:02AM EST (link)Not much to misunderstand in the posts. Go on back to Kos or whereever.
In Vino Veritas
Heh. Old guys (and Bunnies) rock. nt
mbecker908 (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 11:02AM EST (link)I got your poll right here...
speciallist (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 2:08AM EST (link)do you know who rush limbaugh is? 92%
do you think Barry is in a rush? 1%
do you know that Barry makes lots of errs? 2%
do you know this bill ayers? 1%
do you know this bill is full of pork? 1%
do you know which bill likes to pork? 2%
do you know what the definition of is is? 1%
Oh Jeez, Rush is the target, but............
Joel Farnham (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 6:15AM EST (link)Dammit, we really are to blame for it.
Yes, Rush will take the arrows, the slings of outrageous fortune, but we are the ones Obama wants to crush. WE.
The outspoken few. WE.
We should speak out. We should state our purpose. We should pursue our goals.Give Obama and his army ten million people to aim after.
And not just Rush.
Call me what you want, just don’t call me late for dinner.
To me the most telling thing about that poll
kyle8 (Diary) Tuesday, February 10th at 6:40AM EST (link)to me is that among ALL voters, not just Rethuglicans, Faux news still out polls the mainstream media by 26 points.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle