TPX endorsed Walt Minnick, a Dem Congressman from ID just to show the world how bi-partisan it is. Now Walt Minnick doesn’t want TPX aid anymore.

Expect Jane Norton to attack Ken Buck for having TPX support.

Also NV Dems are immediately attacking Sharron Angle for being the TPX candidate.

TPX did a lot of good work in the primaries. They gave the needed boosts to Angle, Buck, and Joe Miller.

I think TPX endorsed candidated should just offer no comment on the Tea Party feud.

it is quite simply just a group of Americans who for the majority have NEVER participated in a protest and felt it was time to stand up for AMERICA! These tools who co-opt them for their own wealth and or power are nothing more then the same POS President and his Congresspeople are and that is an affront to everything that America stand FOR!

and it should not be a party. I know I did not elect any of these so called leaders. I have not read the satirical letter so I have no comment on that. But I don’t agree with the “tea party guy” on Deface the Nation either. The left wants us to play whack a mole.

We should not let the left distract us as we conservatives always do. The tea party movement was supposed to be about conservatives fighting a government leviathan and attempting to get our government back to Constitutional principles as the Founders intended. If this is no longer the case, then what is the point?

Once again RedState brings out its 50 caliber weapons to participate in a circular firing squad. We need to stay concentrated on the real enemy – the Democrat party and the leaders of that party, not the occasional foolishness of our own people. The real story here is still the racism and the irrelevancy of the NAACP, not the over eager zealousness of Mark Williams.

They said that the Tea Party does not address the apparently racist elements within or affiliated with it. Perhaps a difference without a distinction but a difference nonetheless.

Regardless, recent events have proven that the NAACP is wrong even here because, as is the topic of this diary, the Tea Party did address the apparent racism — or at least, the “racial ignorance” — of Mark Williams. If only the NAACP would follow the same track of integrity as the Tea Party.

What I find most interesting, however, is that Mark Williams has stated that he was in dialog with NAACP when he found out that he was expelled from the National Tea Party Federation: saying that he heard about it as he was at a flight stopover from appearing on the “Geraldo Show” (or whatever it’s called) along with members of the NAACP when he first heard about it. To hear Mark Williams tell it, that meeting was quite positive and they did find mutual point of interest between the NAACP and the Tea Party. Although I personally have very long-standing and deep disagreements with the NAACP, I confess that I am sincerely curious about what, if anything, will happen with that.

he brielfy talked about some city that has alerted it’s police to watch those that have bumper stickers on their vehicles supporting organizations such as Ron Paul’s Campaign4Liberty. I support free speech, and anyone supporting whatever organization they chose to affiliate with.

My problem with the Campaign4Liberty has been in statements on their own site saying that they were planning to “take over” the Republican party, and to recreate it in their image. They choose candidates to support, I’ve posted the link to their supported candidates. They only support those that pass their vetting. One of the requirements is that they must support their anti-war policies. Remember Ron Paul said, we can protect our country with a few good submarines? We all know that Ron Paul supports some far out policies. Paul seems to be anti-semite, and I personally have seen some posts from C4L members screaming about those evil Joooos, and talk about the money being sent to Israel. They don’t make such a big fuss at the money we send to so many other countries, Israel is singled out.

What I am wondering is if the left may be including these kooks as being representative of the Tea Party supporters. Some of them really can be seen as far right radicals to some degree at least. Have the C4L enablers co-opted the Tea Part movement? They certainly have tried.

Until then, I don’t believe you have a leg to stand on.

To all Republicans, Tea Partiers, and assembled throngs who hope to defeat Democrat candidates in November:

IT’S THE ECONOMY, STUPID! You have to be brain-dead to talk about anything else between now and November.

Many White Nationalist organizations, and their membership, identify themselves with the tea parties. They are upset that the dems are led by a black president, that the dems want to give amnesty to illegal Hispanics, and that Obama has nominated a Jewish woman to the supreme court. With that being the case, several whit nationalist members show up at tea parties. I have seen this personally. Then, of course, the media concentrates on them and not the other 99% of the people there. Like I said, handle this at the ground level. If you see these racist organizations show up at a rally, make sure they know they are not welcome. Let the MSM get video of you screaming at these idiots to leave.

It is actually a pretty stunning piece of satire. My interpretation was that he was making fun of the term “Colored”, in the name of the NAACP, but his real point was that the left sees minorities as oppressed groups that need to be cared for, by liberal geniuses, not as individuals.

This post was very heavy handed and not at all racially sensitive. In fact, the guy could have dropped all the “masa” and “coloreds” talk and he could have written a decent critique of old left organizations such as the NAACP as well as the modern progressive victim movement.

I in know way am defending this guy, but I do argue that we should have never been put in the position to defend him or kick him out. Centralization inevitably results in scandals for the group that decides to centralize. I say we individuals need to focus on regaining freedom for all Americans.

. . . to tell the truth. I’d never heard a thing about Webb prior to Sunday, and if I had it was in passing. Whether or not – and I say strongly “not” – the NTPF has the right to commandeer a grassroots movement is not the issue here.

The issue is Williams and his horrible statement. I don’t personally think he’s truly a racist, just that he had a moment akin in satirical experience to Michael Richards. That being said, perception goes a long way – if it didn’t, who knows what would have been done with Arizona’s endless tide of anchor babies?

If Williams screwed up, or in any other way necessitates his feet being held to the fire, he should be made known of that. Period and full stop.

You don’t combat idiocy by being an idiot yourself.

with the facts. Racists, especially those associated with LULAC or the NAACP try to argue facts based on religion, because they think they are doing Christian work. Give them blatant facts and they flounder.

Regarding the haves vs. the have nots – or why I am against extending benefits to anyone, but especially to Obamabots who find it easier to be on the dole than work:

New American Standard Bible 2 Thessalonians 3:10
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
For even when we were with you, we used to give you this order: if anyone is not willing to work, then he is not to eat, either.

Ecclesiastes 2:24 (New American Standard Bible)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
24There is (A)nothing better for a man than to eat and drink and tell himself that his labor is good This also I have seen that it is (B)from the hand of God.

Regarding the teachings of black theology and the promotion of reparations, or why I think the whole load of BS is not biblical and only an idiot would consider it to be:

Deuteronomy 24:16
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
English Standard Version (ESV)
16(A) “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.

Regarding the distribution of wealth, Robin Hood, or any other distributive plan:
Matthew 22:21 ESV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They said, “Caesar’s.” Then he said to them, “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

I haven’t got a problem paying taxes, but when those who are supposed to be stewards of our wealth are corrupt I prefer:

Ezekiel 22:12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
12 In you they take bribes to shed blood; you take interest and profit [1] and make gain of your neighbors by extortion; but me you have forgotten, declares the Lord God.

Leviticus 25:36
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] 22:12 That is, profit that comes from charging interest to the poor

John 2:14-15 ESV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the temple he found those who were selling oxen and sheep and pigeons, and the money-changers sitting there. And making a whip of cords, he drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen. And he poured out the coins of the money-changers and overturned their tables.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From Malkin’s site today regarding the history of the Klan.

How did the Ku Klux Klan re-emerge in the 20th century? For that, the Democratic Party is to blame.

It was a racist Democrat President, Woodrow Wilson, who premiered Birth of a Nation in the White House. That racist movie was based on a racist book written by one of Wilson’s racist friends from college. In 1915, the movie spawned the modern-day Klan, with its burning crosses and white sheets.

Inspired by the movie, some Georgia Democrats revived the Klan. Soon, the Ku Klux Klan again became a powerful force within the Democratic Party. The KKK so dominated the 1924 Democratic Convention that Republicans, speaking truth to power, called it the Klanbake. In the 1930s, a Democrat President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, appointed a Klansman, Senator Hugo Black (D-AL), to the U.S. Supreme Court. In the 1950s, the Klansmen against whom the civil rights movement struggled were Democrats. The notorious police commissioner Bull Connor, who attacked African-Americans with dogs and clubs and fire hoses, was both a Klansman and the Democratic Party’s National Committeeman for Alabama. Starting in the 1980s, the Democratic Party elevated a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), to third-in-line for the presidency.

Hey Red State grow some balls. The whole problem is showing fear and subjugation to the racism charge for whites to sit down and shut up.

The racial chauvenism of minorities has become so bad these days Mr. Williams response, while not ideal, shouldn’t be condemned. If you don’t like it, ignore it. Only God is the judge of people, not the left or right’s antiracism sentiments. Everyone is a freakin racist to some extent. Let’s be honest with each other.

WHO GIVES A CRAP. You give racism the power of the golden calf.

Its simply not that important anymore.

Michelle Malkin had it right: NAACP = National Association for the Advancement of CODDLED People

As soon as these national “umbrella” organizations started to compete for primacy, they set themselves up to eventually become a issue. The people who attended Tea Party meetings weren’t showing loyalty to Williams, TPX, or NTPF. They were showing their loyalty and concern for their country, not any particular speaker or self-styled “leader” . . .

I absolutely agree the movement must abandon the label now, if only to deep-six those who would co-opt it, even with the best of intentions.